iamnotaracist
I'm a chill dude trust me
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2026
- Posts
- 4,017
- Reputation
- 6,116
Studies show that looks are about 50-60% objective, but imo it's probably slightly more than 60%. But looks still can be subjective, there's Chadlites that get treated better than Chads, and i think that factors in both Smv and women's subjectivity. Men often agree more, but women care way more about the man's specific traits.
For example, there's two guys that are both completely and equally Chadlite, but more women goes for the other-this is because women have more specific demands, with a slight most of women liking less striking faces. This one Chadlite is much less striking but he has other factors in his face that compensate for his less striking appearance for it being that the cl who gets more girls and has a less striking face is equal to the other Cl
I think this is also what women think as their "types", not that their overall attractiveness score (which is based on sexual success rather than social hierarchy) is subjective with no clear rating but a more skewed specifics, which despite the face being the same score, one would have higher smv due to facial traits with more demand.
For example, there's two guys that are both completely and equally Chadlite, but more women goes for the other-this is because women have more specific demands, with a slight most of women liking less striking faces. This one Chadlite is much less striking but he has other factors in his face that compensate for his less striking appearance for it being that the cl who gets more girls and has a less striking face is equal to the other Cl
I think this is also what women think as their "types", not that their overall attractiveness score (which is based on sexual success rather than social hierarchy) is subjective with no clear rating but a more skewed specifics, which despite the face being the same score, one would have higher smv due to facial traits with more demand.
