Looks is the reason why Hazard > Salah

AspiringMogger

AspiringMogger

Life is what you make it
Joined
Sep 4, 2022
Posts
11,490
Reputation
18,990
Legit if you genuinely believe Hazard is better than Salah you’re a lookist piece of shit

IMG 9069


IMG 9070


Hazard looks better on the eye but if you look at who is more efficient it’s night and day.

Goals to game ratio Salah shits on Hazard.

Even assist to game ratio; it’s close but salah (0.26 PG) edges it against hazard (0.22 PG).

The eye test is the only reason you’d say Hazard is better than Salah, cause Hazard looks better on the ball tbh.

It is what it is. Looks rein supreme.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: MaghrebGator, HitAndRun, Deleted member 23558 and 2 others
Who?
 
  • +1
Reactions: HTN_Mentalcel, Deleted member 77134 and Deleted member 72551
Both are wingers but doesn't Salah sometimes play central. Also Hazard wasn't main PK taker was he for Chelsea?
 
  • +1
Reactions: AspiringMogger
Same with ronaldo and messi
 
IMG 4661

Also he doesnt even look good
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: HitAndRun, Deleted member 23558 and mrriceguyreturn
Legit if you genuinely believe Hazard is better than Salah you’re a lookist piece of shit

View attachment 2995933

View attachment 2995934

Hazard looks better on the eye but if you look at who is more efficient it’s night and day.

Goals to game ratio Salah shits on Hazard.

Even assist to game ratio; it’s close but salah (0.26 PG) edges it against hazard (0.22 PG).

The eye test is the only reason you’d say Hazard is better than Salah, cause Hazard looks better on the ball tbh.

It is what it is. Looks rein supreme.
It's not really lookism, just different type of players, same shit as Lampard vs Iniesta
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and Deleted member 44368
Both are wingers but doesn't Salah sometimes play central. Also Hazard wasn't main PK taker was he for Chelsea?
No he wasn’t but salah still got more open play goals. He is as a winger more profficient than hazard
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
Hazard was more entertaing tho, his dribbles were better but efficiency wise yea salah is better. He was like ronaldinho of PL to an extent
 
  • +1
Reactions: HitAndRun
It's not really lookism, just different type of players, same shit as Lampard vs Iniesta
Iniesta was an 8. Lampardinho was a 10. Different breed innit
 
they look about the same lookswise
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger and HitAndRun
Hazard sucked in the european cup
 
  • +1
Reactions: HitAndRun
Palah is the most overrated player ever
Prime Adam Johnson clears him
 
I dont think salah looks that much worse that its mostly looks for being the reason people prefer hazard
Probably alot of it is also name falio
Hazard is a cool sounding name while salah has muslim falio
Mate you’ve completely misunderstood my post. Legit dog shit reading comprehension. This has nothing to do with looks, it’s about aesthetics when they play football
 

Similar threads

lurking truecel
Replies
0
Views
39
lurking truecel
lurking truecel
killuacel
Replies
2
Views
35
rance
rance
DutchVanDerLinde
Replies
2
Views
31
Dancin
Dancin
trvechud
Replies
19
Views
136
trvechud
trvechud
Baeseth
Replies
3
Views
34
Baeseth
Baeseth

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top