LooksIQ

Mansur

Mansur

Every Cope has an End
Joined
Jul 21, 2024
Posts
4,681
Reputation
7,625
Just scrolled through

And have noticed that 99.9% of the users have unideal/ bad mouth width to nose ratios and thin necks, unexaggerated

Caused by wide Alar Bases combined with narrow lips

Its insane how much confidence they have while being obese, having bad skin, major flaws etc

A lot ot them also look super uncanny

Squinting thinking it will save their asses
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan, americanpakitruvcel and pexy
@pexy
@SilvioMoltisantiDan
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan and pexy
life of the normie

they’re not conscious or sentient
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Mansur
Just scrolled through

And have noticed that 99.9% of the users have unideal/ bad mouth width to nose ratios and thin necks, unexaggerated

Caused by wide Alar Bases combined with narrow lips

Its insane how much confidence they have while being obese, having bad skin, major flaws etc

A lot ot them also look super uncanny

Squinting thinking it will save their asses
I hate my smile is to upturn
 
Squinting is a really funny cope, looks like shit for a lot of guys
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Mansur
Just scrolled through

And have noticed that 99.9% of the users have unideal/ bad mouth width to nose ratios and thin necks, unexaggerated

Caused by wide Alar Bases combined with narrow lips

Its insane how much confidence they have while being obese, having bad skin, major flaws etc

A lot ot them also look super uncanny

Squinting thinking it will save their asses
mouth to nose is very brutal, like, almost no psl god has a unideal mouth to nose (narrow lips), ofc theres chads with so wide lips
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
mouth to nose is very brutal, like, almost no psl god has a unideal mouth to nose (narrow lips), ofc theres chads with so wide lips
Men can get away with it to a certain degree as a low ratio is more dimorphic but dude I would have never expected this flaw to be this common

Getting close to IAA JFA deviation

Ngl deviation should be deleted, something should click in the head if close to noone nails it
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan
Men can get away with it to a certain degree as a low ratio is more dimorphic but dude I would have never expected this flaw to be this common

Getting close to IAA JFA deviation

Ngl deviation should be deleted, something should click in the head if close to noone nails it
imo dev iaa jfa is legit, what is not legit is deviation bitemporal/Bigonial kinda useless
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
niggas will post rating threads without reading any botb
 
imo dev iaa jfa is legit, what is not legit is deviation bitemporal/Bigonial kinda useless
I dont really think so, a lot of angles look similar. Inventing a deviation through that is useless and doesnt affect attractiveness at all

Also contradicts the sheet itself, 84.5 all the way to 95 degrees are ideal yet the deviation should be 2.5 at most.

The human eye doesnt even recognize the IAA as a measurement, well at least not when comparing to JFA

And idk what type of Grey ratio Bitemporal - Bigonial is
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan
I dont really think so, a lot of angles look similar. Inventing a deviation through that is useless and doesnt affect attractiveness at all

Also contradicts the sheet itself, 84.5 all the way to 95 degrees are ideal yet the deviation should be 2.5 at most.

The human eye doesnt even recognize the IAA as a measurement, well at least not when comparing to JFA

And idk what type of Grey ratio Bitemporal - Bigonial is
idk but imo ppl with good iaa jfa deviation looks better than the ppl who has a bad deviation jfa iaa, what is something i dont support (aswell has you) is the ideal range
imo ideal range of jfa should be 85-90
not 85-95 and for iaa the same 85-90
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
idk but imo ppl with good iaa jfa deviation looks better than the ppl who has a bad deviation jfa iaa, what is something i dont support (aswell has you) is the ideal range
imo ideal range of jfa should be 85-90
not 85-95 and for iaa the same 85-90
I feel like steeper Jaws dont look nearly as bad as flat Jaws. Barely a Flaw imo

<94 sounds more right to me. At 95 it starts to get a little boxy

And I cant really think of any people nailing the deviation, most faces deviate 6-10 degrees on average
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan
I feel like steeper Jaws dont look nearly as bad as flat Jaws. Barely a Flaw imo

<94 sounds more right to me. At 95 it starts to get a little boxy

And I cant really think of any people nailing the deviation, most faces deviate 6-10 degrees on average
my problem is, The ideal range is very forgiving, like is very hard to have a unideal jfa tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mansur
my problem is, The ideal range is very forgiving, like is very hard to have a unideal jfa tbh
I mean as long as it visually looks normal then why not extending the ideal range

And quite a good amount of people fail JFA
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilvioMoltisantiDan
I mean as long as it visually looks normal then why not extending the ideal range

And quite a good amount of people fail JFA
yeah, maybe im just pointing to psl gods but in avg the ppl may have a unideal jfa
 
They take pictures that are heavily frauded, squinted and angled and think that its what they look like subconsciously to others geg, ive fell for the same lie a while back


do normies really?
 

Similar threads

Z
Replies
7
Views
44
TestoMaxxer
TestoMaxxer
bIiss
Replies
2
Views
26
Roara
Roara
Heartache
Replies
2
Views
43
IOD
IOD
kbj
Replies
4
Views
27
maxilexo
maxilexo
E
Replies
0
Views
27
eology
E

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top