LOOKSMAX.ME IS GOING TO UNIVERISTY IN DENMARK

[Truemaxxer]

Jfl they define our aspie terms as if it were some scientific language


"Looksmax.me is a forum for involuntary celibate men to discuss
their possibilities of “looksmaxxing”. That is, to increase (maximize)
their looks to the highest of their potential, in order to achieve
the sexual attention of desirable women. Whereas incels.is has a
distinctively “blackpilled” outlook on inceldom (as in, the situation
is inevitable and cannot be changed), looksmax.me applies a more
“redpilled” approach: The cornerstone here is that looks matter the
most, and the users should strive for objective good looks."

 

[Deleted member 6856]

Denmark university kys

 

[Deleted member 6475]

@Danish_Retard elab

 

[Deleted member 4562]

I read the original paper, it was pretty accurate tbh, as accurate as you can write something without rotting here.

 

[Deleted member 3990]

Didnt look at the pics but the preface looks acceptable, accurate and neutral

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

Every single paper has this problem of not even understanding the redpill or blackpill and the difference between them. They even have a full, unbiased description of both plainly posted on the incels wiki but I have not yet read a single one of these research papers that references it. The low effort these “researchers” have when writing these papers about inceldom or looksmaxing is astonishing. Imagine writing a paper about fluid dynamics and you dont even know what the word “fluid” means. Jfl taxpayer dollars are going to this, what a joke

 

[Mongrelcel]

Imagine going to the univeristy and studying a bunch of rotters on .me

 

[Deleted member 2214]

Hey Danes! Include me in the screenshot!

 

[Deleted member 2597]

Shit the blackpill keeps getting mainstream

 

[Truemaxxer]

Every single paper has this problem of not even understanding the redpill or blackpill and the difference between them. They even have a full, unbiased description of both plainly posted on the incels wiki but I have not yet read a single one of these research papers that references it. The low effort these “researchers” have when writing these papers about inceldom or looksmaxing is astonishing. Imagine writing a paper about fluid dynamics and you dont even know what the word “fluid” means. Jfl taxpayer dollars are going to this, what a joke

They did a pretty good job tho by describing terms and stuff....

They just fucked it up by naming the document
"the angry Internet"

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

They did a pretty good job tho by describing terms and stuff....

They just fucked it up by naming the document
"the angry Internet"

I do have to give him credit, he got many things right. But considering the fact that many things are easily found out just by reading the faq, and other easily found info, it seems amazing the stuff he got wrong. For example, he says in the first sentence that looksmax is for involuntary celbates to improve their looks, when the site clearly states that anyone is welcome, whether they are ugly or attractive or sexually successful or not. Its just such a half assed paper. The paper is organized and written clearly but obviously he only read of few of the biggest threads and then made assumptions based on that. He says that these big threads have views which are supported “site wide” which is again not true

 

[Deleted member 11167]

Shit the blackpill keeps getting mainstream

I told you all we need to private all of the forums or at least make them so that you need to have a certain amount of reputation to post.

 

[JustAFewMM]

make this forum private finally wtf

 

[TheChosenChad]

whoever wrote this kys srs

 

[TheChosenChad]

make this forum private finally wtf

its about the sheckles

 

[TITUS]

The one about memes and meme warfare was better.

 

[whiteissuperior]

 

[Deleted member 5189]

What utter subhuman would waste their time doing this?

 

[tyronelite]

LOLOLOLOL

 

[Deleted member 275]

I do have to give him credit, he got many things right. But considering the fact that many things are easily found out just by reading the faq, and other easily found info, it seems amazing the stuff he got wrong. For example, he says in the first sentence that looksmax is for involuntary celbates to improve their looks, when the site clearly states that anyone is welcome, whether they are ugly or attractive or sexually successful or not. Its just such a half assed paper. The paper is organized and written clearly but obviously he only read of few of the biggest threads and then made assumptions based on that. He says that these big threads have views which are supported “site wide” which is again not true

These people keep thinking that incel is a title you give yourself, instead of something that you simply are for being considered low-value in the eyes of women.

If they want to know what the average incel's life looks like, they merely have to go to the average university/college/high school and ask any guy that is 4PSL or lower about how his life is and how is relationships with women are.

 

[Lorsss]

JFL I COULD NEVER IMAGINE MY STATEMENTS WOULD BE DISCUSSED BY UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Faggots

 

[Deleted member 5634]

Rent free

 

[Deleted member 8576]

princeton

 

[Mongrelcel]

make this forum private finally wtf