Looksmaxers in the wild shitting on Chad

[Copexodius Maximus]

You can easily spot the looksmaxer in the wild by the way they use language. Here the looksmaxer spots features that will indicate how over it is for the Chad, such as asymmetrical eyes negative canthal tilt.

Regardless, this is a blackpill for any of you copers who think somehow women weren’t Chad chasers in the past before feminism. Looks have always mattered more than anything for sexual attraction, and anyone saying otherwise after all the evidence is either mentally ill or low iq.

 

[Jeffrey Epstein]

He was a manlet.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

He was a manlet.

How tall was he?

 

[Jeffrey Epstein]

How tall was he?

172cm

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

172cm

That’s 5’7”. That was good in the 1930s, as it’s around the average height at the time. Plus with his “chad” face he was a mogger

 

[gamma]

 

[gamma]

172cm

Ideal height

 

[Deleted member 5786]

reminder if he was lanklet like me or @LooksOverAll none of that would happen

 

[Clark69]

blue eye pill

 

[Deleted member 5786]

That’s 5’7”. That was good in the 1930s, as it’s around the average height at the time. Plus with his “chad” face he was a mogger

even now its a good height

 

[Slasher]

View attachment 1482018View attachment 1482020

You can easily spot the looksmaxer in the wild by the way they use language. Here the looksmaxer spots features that will indicate how over it is for the Chad, such as asymmetrical eyes negative canthal tilt.

Regardless, this is a blackpill for any of you copers who think somehow women weren’t Chad chasers in the past before feminism. Looks have always mattered more than anything for sexual attraction, and anyone saying otherwise after all the evidence is either mentally ill or low iq.

@Copexodius Maximus Hey Bitch, Gimme Ur Nudes.

 

[Deleted member 14138]

View attachment 1482018View attachment 1482020

You can easily spot the looksmaxer in the wild by the way they use language. Here the looksmaxer spots features that will indicate how over it is for the Chad, such as asymmetrical eyes negative canthal tilt.

Regardless, this is a blackpill for any of you copers who think somehow women weren’t Chad chasers in the past before feminism. Looks have always mattered more than anything for sexual attraction, and anyone saying otherwise after all the evidence is either mentally ill or low iq.

Well he is ugly.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Well he is ugly.

Looksmax forum standards

 

[Deleted member 16288]

How can he have a mogger front but so shit side?

 

[Tusseleif]

That’s 5’7”. That was good in the 1930s, as it’s around the average height at the time. Plus with his “chad” face he was a mogger

My grandfather was 180 cm in the 1940s when the average was 174 cm. My other grandfather was 188 cm in the 60s. Mirin tbh, now 180 would be dead on average here

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

How can he have a mogger front but so shit side?

He took the Meeks pill

My grandfather was 180 cm in the 1940s when the average was 174 cm. My other grandfather was 188 cm in the 60s. Mirin tbh, now 180 would be dead on average here

It’s brutal af when you’re the same height as your grandparents, but they would be considered tall while you rot as average. It’s brutal.

 

[mortis]

incels have to cope, thats the only way they can dodge the rope
also coloring/ratio/pill strikes again.

 

[Deleted member 14138]

Looksmax forum standards

Eh. Maybe he's just average. But he aint no looker, that's for sure.

 

[Deleted member 5786]

Eh. Maybe he's just average. But he aint no looker, that's for sure.

you think brando mogs him ?

 

[spark]

That’s 5’7”. That was good in the 1930s, as it’s around the average height at the time. Plus with his “chad” face he was a mogger

closer to 5'8