Looksmaxxers can't calculate ratios and angles - with example

[Deleted member 45735]

The famous Salludon angles photo which calculates his brow ridge angle at 87
[caveman tier]

His actual nasofrontal angle [110]

How many of you have seen that original photo and looked past the incorrect angles and just took it as law?

Many such examples.
Why are looksmaxxers so bad at calculating angles? I swear 1 in 3 I see are just wrong and when I correct it they fight me to the bitter end.

 

[the foid stalker]

the angle calculation discourse reveals a deeper issue - most amateur looksmax analysis confuses soft tissue with hard tissue landmarks. salludon's case shows how even iconic examples get mismeasured when people eyeball 2D photos instead of using 3D cephalometric points. the 87 vs 110 discrepancy likely comes from whether you're measuring at nasion or sellion which are different reference points entirely.

 

[Deleted member 45735]

the angle calculation discourse reveals a deeper issue - most amateur looksmax analysis confuses soft tissue with hard tissue landmarks. salludon's case shows how even iconic examples get mismeasured when people eyeball 2D photos instead of using 3D cephalometric points. the 87 vs 110 discrepancy likely comes from whether you're measuring at nasion or sellion which are different reference points entirely.

this nigga thinks he's a scientist

 

[the foid stalker]

this nigga thinks he's a scientist

science? nah. just basic anatomy any ortho resident could spot. but since we're dumbing it down, wrong landmarks = wrong angles = wrong cope. measure from the same points everyone else uses or stay confused.

 

[Deleted member 45735]

science? nah. just basic anatomy any ortho resident could spot. but since we're dumbing it down, wrong landmarks = wrong angles = wrong cope. measure from the same points everyone else uses or stay confused.

And what do you believe is the correct landmark, soft tissue or bone

 

[penaldinho]

the angle calculation discourse reveals a deeper issue - most amateur looksmax analysis confuses soft tissue with hard tissue landmarks. salludon's case shows how even iconic examples get mismeasured when people eyeball 2D photos instead of using 3D cephalometric points. the 87 vs 110 discrepancy likely comes from whether you're measuring at nasion or sellion which are different reference points entirely.

Joined Feb 7, 2025

What are they feeding these greycels

 

[Deleted member 110192]

View attachment 3638073

The famous Salludon angles photo which calculates his brow ridge angle at 87
[caveman tier]
View attachment 3638075
His actual nasofrontal angle [110]

How many of you have seen that original photo and looked past the incorrect angles and just took it as law?

Many such examples.
Why are looksmaxxers so bad at calculating angles? I swear 1 in 3 I see are just wrong and when I correct it they fight me to the bitter end.

They aren’t bad they are just spreading misinformation.

 

[Deleted member 45735]

They aren’t bad they are just spreading misinformation.

Hail the Ayatollah of Iran

 

[Deleted member 110192]

Hail the Ayatollah of Iran

 

[Deleted member 138051]

They aren’t bad they are just spreading misinformation.

wor dto word