@looksoverall height v face explanation attempt

Deleted member 4614

Deleted member 4614

Bronze
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Posts
378
Reputation
733
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
This is cope though. Height and face are obviously not equal. Imo height doesn't matter at all, it's just a byproduct of good development. It's a case of "correlation does not equal causation". Good looking guys tend to be tall due to better bone development, hormones, and ethnicity as well. Tall guys in themselves are not inherently attractive.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel and Tyronecell
i will never be 6'10 :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: thecel
He didnt say they were equal, it was moreso that a failo is a much bigger negative than a halo is a positive
Not really. 6'5" normie don't slay. 6'5" normies do just as well as 5'9" normies. It's just the fact that someone who's 6'5" and considered "normie" has bigger skull, more robust bones, etc.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, Deleted member 8853, johncruz12345 and 2 others
This is cope though. Height and face are obviously not equal. Imo height doesn't matter at all, it's just a byproduct of good development. It's a case of "correlation does not equal causation". Good looking guys tend to be tall due to better bone development, hormones, and ethnicity as well. Tall guys in themselves are not inherently attractive.
Cope they’re equally important
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14266 and LastHopeForNorman
Cope they’re equally important
My bottom 5% face + top 99.9% height would mean I have the SMV of a normie. Normies aren't friendless KHHV at 22.
 
  • +1
Reactions: johncruz12345 and LastHopeForNorman
The post explains that it only does that with the arithmetic mean and using the harmonic mean would give you an SMV in the bottom 10%. In essence failos fuck you way harder than halos help you
According to what? Some incel's post on a forum? I haven't seen 2 men of the exact same face, personality, etc have different results purely off of height.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
the sad truth is that @LooksOverAll will get 2393 surgeries, then get laid and will pretend like it was the surgeries and not the towering height
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, Tyronecell, Deleted member 7725 and 2 others
As long as the guy is at least 5ft10 or in general?
In general. Guys who are < ~5'9" tend to have pathetic craniofacial and overall development. I've never seen someone 5'5" with a Henry Cavill jaw and skull. Most guys with that level of robustness are 6'0"+.
the sad truth is that @LooksOverAll will get 2393 surgeries, then get laid and will pretend like it was the surgeries and not the towering height
Cope. I'm not some basement dwelling incel. I go to college, go to afterschool clubs, talk to classmates, gym, sports, etc. I just get rejection after rejection.
 
Sure, but what about a 5ft7-8 guy with a chadlite face? I think the 6ft3 chadlite does significantly better, but thats my opinion.

In the interest of finding the “truth” there is 1 study that I know of supporting what you are saying strongly. I will link it and quote it in a new response.
If they have the exact same bones, face, robustness, etc then they will do exactly the same. There's no evidence that height increases your sex appeal at all. Otherwise we'd see 6'5" normie slaying, which we don't.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LastHopeForNorman and Looks234
It's not taking variables into account. Short guys usually have worse genes: balding, wimp skulled and framed, recessed, etc. It's like having a study of "Skull sizes and sexual choosiness" based purely on skull size and not taking the fact that bigger skulls usually have better jaws, cheekbones, etc. Correlation vs causation.

Only thing that matters is that you're taller than the girl, even that is a socially constructed standard. Same way girls on Tinder say "6'+ only". Do you really think they, without any external influence, choose to discriminate men based on them being exactly 6' or taller? It's just societal pressure that tells girls to date taller men. JBs don't date tall guys, they date guys who have attractive faces. Girls are extremely impressionable so telling them that they need tall men will change their wants. Even that doesn't matter until they're looking to actually settle with someone.
 
Last edited:
@LooksOverAll


Study supporting face>>height but height still matters (a little)… face accounted for ~52% of attractiveness and body 24%

IIRC height was a small portion of the 24%-
strength was 70% of it and height was only 10%. Obviously studies aren’t perfect and height can be linked into strength, but being extremely generous height is 10% of attractiveness, following the study exactly its 2.4%. While face is 52%. The other shit besides face/physique/height is likely status, voice, etc.
That study is cope. Face is 85%, body is 15%. Nothing else matters, it's all just a byproduct of good development. You have some balls to cite a study that says face is only 52% of total attractiveness on a blackpill forum JFL.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 4614
Lol what? I think its fair to say approx 52% face, 25% body/height, 5% voice+dick+fashion, ~18% STATUS. Professional athletes, rappers etc definitely make women attracted to guys, not just trying to use them for $$.
You're extremely bluepilled. 85% face and 15% body, most of which is frame.

Professional athletes literally get child support and divorce raped all the time. They're just gold diggers JFL.
 
Maybe, I am not an expert. I think unpopular guys are a turn off to women though. Social proof playing a part in attractiveness is not bluepilled no?

Guys with chad faces get divorce raped? I personally think a man being adored for his athletic prowess makes a girl more attracted to him.

Im not claiming to be an authority on this I am just trying to learn more and discuss. If I was convinced that status didn’t matter I could allocate more time away from it, same with muh muscles vs face. Hence why I spend time having this discussion. If i thought status was 90% of attractiveness I would blast test and try to play a college sport. So these discussions are actually important and can effect my IRL decisions?
Correlation is not equal to causation. Popular guys are popular because they are good looking and athletes are popular because they have more dimorphism and robustness. I played a college sport and got nothing out of it, only guys who slayed were guys who would've slayed without sports.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4614
In general. Guys who are < ~5'9" tend to have pathetic craniofacial and overall development. I've never seen someone 5'5" with a Henry Cavill jaw and skull. Most guys with that level of robustness are 6'0"+.

Cope. I'm not some basement dwelling incel. I go to college, go to afterschool clubs, talk to classmates, gym, sports, etc. I just get rejection after rejection.
You meet a lot of people but i WONDER if you talk to girls and how you to talk to girls
also stop being such a defeatist
 
You meet a lot of people but i WONDER if you talk to girls and how you to talk to girls
also stop being such a defeatist
I'm extremely confident talking to girls and have approached at least 15 girls this semester, rejected by all. I'm not awkward whatsoever.

I also did Tinder with "6'7"" in bio and got 2 matches, both bots.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4614
He’s lying
He’s 5’8 and Indian and Russian
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8853
Not really. 6'5" normie don't slay. 6'5" normies do just as well as 5'9" normies. It's just the fact that someone who's 6'5" and considered "normie" has bigger skull, more robust bones, etc.
I'm 6 feet and have the maxilla of a 14 yr old
 
I'm 6 feet and have the maxilla of a 14 yr old
No you don't. We're the same age and you look like you could be my dad JFL. You look masc af.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8853
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 7725
Height literally does not matter outside of the US
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7725
Height literally does not matter outside of the US
Exactly, finding height attractive, especially a set number like "6 foot and above", is just a result of social pressure.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Uglybrazilian

Similar threads

tombradylover
Serious A few copes
2 3
Replies
100
Views
3K
LKSMAXPerson
L
God-himself
2
Replies
87
Views
2K
castizo_ascender
castizo_ascender
Sloppyseconds
Replies
36
Views
2K
delonisliterallyme
delonisliterallyme
prince_
Replies
23
Views
942
prince_
prince_

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top