Losing faith in blackpill

Even if the blackpill isn't true in dating looks still influence your life and career to a very large degree, that is actually scientifically proven.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7079
Even if the blackpill isn't true in dating looks still influence your life and career to a very large degree, that is actually scientifically proven.
Thats not what he said you fucking subhuman low iq retarded monkey

Fking slit ur wrists kys no one likes you

You are unknown
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, Deleted member 4310 and Copeful
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 7192, Deleted member 7079, bladeeout and 2 others
Our interpretation of reality is an opinion

On what basis does "1" exist, what is "1" is merely an opinion. Logic is just used to be consistent compared with our perceived reality.
1 exists as a concept based on objective reality.

If you have a single line, then it is one line. Because 1 is singular. you cannot describe 1 line as 2, because 2 is multiple. You can’t describe 1 line as 0, because 0 is nothing and 1 is something,

Math is built off of this concept. The descriptions / ideas in math, are only meant to describe things that happen. They exist because these processes exist.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deathrasher42, Euclidd, stuckneworleans and 1 other person
It’s has never been about PSL but SMV and JBW
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaMogger
I think most users are just envious of what psl 7-8 can get - undeniably they are like living gods. But it's also consensus that you can live a decent dating life with psl 5.5-6.

You can also get sex with psl 4-5 but probably not the ones you really want.

Bruh I'm psl 3.5 and I had nice hook ups back to High School / College.

Blackpill may be 100% accurate for grown ups tho. Maybe, I don't know... Yet.
 
I think it's crucial to distinguish between "just getting a girl" and "getting someone you really want".

To fulfill the first requirement blackpill makes less sense (unless you're truecel tier).

To fulfill the second requirement there's certainly a looks threshold needed. Where this threshold lies is debatable.

Most looksmaxxxers are just bitter about not getting the girl they really desire tbh.
 
  • +1
Reactions: draco, Effortless, GigaMogger and 5 others
Also, isn’t @Amnesia proof that Chad fucks a different girl everyday?
 
Thats not what he said you fucking subhuman low iq retarded monkey

Fking slit ur wrists kys no one likes you

You are unknown
He said that blackpill beliefs are flawed in terms of dating which may or may not be true.

I'm just pointing out that looks are important in other aspects of life and that it's supported by science so in a sense the blackpill is true.
 
Just walk around downtown or busy area of your city during the day and you’d see lots of subhumans with average girls and girls almost always mog their bf

girls online and sometimes in clubs have high standards
 
  • +1
Reactions: Effortless, GigaMogger, bladeeout and 2 others
I have a couple of personal anecdotes

the few chads in my school are never in relationships, they're obviously busy slaying

so when females cuff a guy its usually not the top 1%
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaMogger and Copeful
It’s has never been about PSL but SMV and JBW
2D8564A0 1903 4F74 BCDE 00A896F996C7


NO JBW COPING ALLOWED IN THIS THREAD. YOU FELL FOR THE JBW MEME BRO. THREAD DEBUNKING JBW COMING SOON

76AE5DDB B573 4BFE 96FB F794C9BAE96A
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: GigaMogger and HowAmIAlive123
I agree with op that’s looks are very important but psl is autistic to think you have be 6 psl to score a 4.5 psl girl lmao most chads only date/fuck stacys irl
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: mulattomaxxer, Effortless, Deleted member 7079 and 5 others
Read every single word and loved it.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Blackout.xl and Copeful
I can’t find it right now, but there’s a study that shows how 2/3 or something like that of millennial men are getting pretty much no sex. For all intents and purposes they are incels.

Blackpill can’t be refuted after seeing that.
2/3 of men are high inhib, socially awkward, and ugly as shit. The average man in the usa is a 3/10. The blackpill isn't that most men aren't getting sex because of women, the blackpill is that most men are just ugly.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, Effortless, GigaMogger and 5 others
it's good to see there are some sensible people on here. Looksmaxxing is a good concept cause it can significantly increase you're success with women and life in general and that's why i'm on here (plus just a funny forum). But I was never blackpilled to the degree that certain people on here are and I think anyone with any irl experience would be the same.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, Effortless, GigaMogger and 6 others
Our interpretation of reality is an opinion

On what basis does "1" exist, what is "1" is merely an opinion. Logic is just used to be consistent compared with our perceived reality.
jfl at this tho.... fml
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackout.xl
Everything here is true if you want to be APPROACHED by women. Fuck approaching them
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Copeful and Blackout.xl
TAGGING MOST BLACKPILLED FAGS ON FORUM:

@DharkDC
@Gosick
@Syobevoli
@Mr.cope
@Vidyacoper
 
  • +1
Reactions: DharkDC and Mr.cope
I have never seen a 5.5+ PSL in my life IRL. The biggest slayer and best looking guy I knew was 5 PSL max. If these people are so statistically rare, how is it that hypergamy can be as widespread as blackpill makes it out to be? Is one chad fucking 100 girls a day nonstop? The numbers just don't add up.

And it's not just hypergamy that seems illogical to me. PSL/looks theory is also becoming more and more irrelevant. PSL gods like Barret and Depoot were considered by many of us to be the epitome of male beauty - MEANING that 100% of women would find them attractive. But of course as we've seen, these guys (who we once thought had the ideal facial structure for attracting women) have next to no appeal.

Then you have "juggernaut law", which theorizes that even extremely unattractive women receive substantial attention from men. This literally makes 0 sense to me. You don't see this kind of simping for ugly chicks in your day to day activities though, do you? Does everybody at work get hard for the obese, acne-ridden black chick at work, or the hot blonde? Sure, they can hop on some app and be overwhelmed with matches, but reminder that this is because of the extremely skewed gender ratios on apps, which inherently artificially boosts the value of all foids.

TL;DR - Day by day the blackpill is becoming more a meme for me than anything else. It just doesn't make sense. Post vantablackpill material ASAP (No "studies" or OLD "experiments" btw, they don't faze me. They are incredibly dubious and not valid, as they produce conflicting results).

I am not saying looks don't matter you faggots. Ofc looks are extremely important, that's why I'm here trying to looksmax. I'm just losing faith in the more autistic/extreme aspects of blackpill theory, like sub8 law, hypergamy, juggernaut law, etc.

Inb4 cope/username checks out.
username checks out, you're a low iq curry. depoot was never good looking, and barrett only looked good in very specific pictures but he still looked like a retarded alien with a lookism squint pheno.

in real life, 4.5psl + NT + dark triad + low inhib is enough to slay many girls. on dating apps the standards are higher due to the male/female ratio. everything matters, but if you want to live in a world where only looks matter, then you do need 8psl looks.
 
username checks out, you're a low iq curry. depoot was never good looking, and barrett only looked good in very specific pictures but he still looked like a retarded alien with a lookism squint pheno.

in real life, 4.5psl + NT + dark triad + low inhib is enough to slay many girls. on dating apps the standards are higher due to the male/female ratio. everything matters, but if you want to live in a world where only looks matter, then you do need 8psl looks.

Dn rd because u dn rd graycel, I was inb4 username checks out, faggot
 
I have never seen a 5.5+ PSL in my life IRL. The biggest slayer and best looking guy I knew was 5 PSL max. If these people are so statistically rare, how is it that hypergamy can be as widespread as blackpill makes it out to be? Is one chad fucking 100 girls a day nonstop? The numbers just don't add up.

And it's not just hypergamy that seems illogical to me. PSL/looks theory is also becoming more and more irrelevant. PSL gods like Barret and Depoot were considered by many of us to be the epitome of male beauty - MEANING that 100% of women would find them attractive. But of course as we've seen, these guys (who we once thought had the ideal facial structure for attracting women) have next to no appeal.

Then you have "juggernaut law", which theorizes that even extremely unattractive women receive substantial attention from men. This literally makes 0 sense to me. You don't see this kind of simping for ugly chicks in your day to day activities though, do you? Does everybody at work get hard for the obese, acne-ridden black chick at work, or the hot blonde? Sure, they can hop on some app and be overwhelmed with matches, but reminder that this is because of the extremely skewed gender ratios on apps, which inherently artificially boosts the value of all foids.

TL;DR - Day by day the blackpill is becoming more a meme for me than anything else. It just doesn't make sense. Post vantablackpill material ASAP (No "studies" or OLD "experiments" btw, they don't faze me. They are incredibly dubious and not valid, as they produce conflicting results).

I am not saying looks don't matter you faggots. Ofc looks are extremely important, that's why I'm here trying to looksmax. I'm just losing faith in the more autistic/extreme aspects of blackpill theory, like sub8 law, hypergamy, juggernaut law, etc.

Inb4 cope/username checks out.
Hypergamy isn't as bad as many make it out to be
Esp. Where I live, smaller town, germany

Blackpill is right about female nature, you will never be good enough
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, Effortless, GigaMogger and 2 others
Ok here's the basics

So you are khhv because ur trash personality?
 
Dn rd because u dn rd graycel, I was inb4 username checks out, faggot
i said username checks out because you didn't want anyone to say it.
my post count / join date ratio indicates that i have no reason to browse this shit forum. i am indeed slaying all day, i have more life experiences than you ever will. i am blackpilled while you are bluepilled and still desperately refreshing this website to find the answers you seek in life. the real blackpill is that you need to looksmax to 4.5psl (you won't get higher unless you're larsanova), and then be NT. almost no one on this website is NT, just look at people like @Won'tStopNoodling , @Colvin76 etc. these people have 8psl looks yet they can't even get a slay with a gookroach panfaced piss-stained subhuman southeast asian foid.
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, Copeful, Deleted member 7192 and 1 other person
Most important part of blackpill lookstheory is :

Don't be below average. (<4 PSL)
If you are below average, it's shit. Fix your failo's, get lean, gymcel, fix your skin = good enough to not stop you from getting a decent life that doesn't involve rotting on incel forums and has plenty of sex.

Ideally you want 5PSL or higher for true freedom and a looks-halo to help you in life.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, mulattomaxxer, Copeful and 2 others
Indeed, I also never saw a Chad, the maximum maybe would be something like 5.5 psl (thankfully).
Barret and other psl gods are idolized more for their high aesthetic than attractiveness in themselves.
The Jungernaut law is only valid on the internet, I see many ugly girls getting a lot of likes, in real life it is quite different. There is a reason for that, which I will post later.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, mulattomaxxer, Effortless and 3 others
Also didnt read
 
i said username checks out because you didn't want anyone to say it.
my post count / join date ratio indicates that i have no reason to browse this shit forum. i am indeed slaying all day, i have more life experiences than you ever will. i am blackpilled while you are bluepilled and still desperately refreshing this website to find the answers you seek in life. the real blackpill is that you need to looksmax to 4.5psl (you won't get higher unless you're larsanova), and then be NT. almost no one on this website is NT, just look at people like @Won'tStopNoodling , @Colvin76 etc. these people have 8psl looks yet they can't even get a slay with a gookroach panfaced piss-stained subhuman southeast asian foid.
You are kinda right but colvin is a subhuman
 
Idk I sort of see it the same as red pill, there are some legit points but at the end of the day it’s autistic bullshit made by computer nerds. The blackpill stuff literally started from a couple of tinder experiments. A large amount of it isn’t based in reality. Any dude on here who has been in a social circle or even remotely NT will tell you they see subhumans dating cute girls
 
  • +1
Reactions: fukmylyf, Deleted member 4123, GigaMogger and 2 others
real blackpill is that you need to looksmax to 4.5psl (you won't get higher unless you're larsanova), and then be NT. almost no one on this website is NT,
agree with this, but them niggas is not 8psl jfl.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai, Deleted member 5698, Deleted member 5809 and 3 others
I have never seen a 5.5+ PSL in my life IRL. The biggest slayer and best looking guy I knew was 5 PSL max. If these people are so statistically rare, how is it that hypergamy can be as widespread as blackpill makes it out to be? Is one chad fucking 100 girls a day nonstop? The numbers just don't add up.

And it's not just hypergamy that seems illogical to me. PSL/looks theory is also becoming more and more irrelevant. PSL gods like Barret and Depoot were considered by many of us to be the epitome of male beauty - MEANING that 100% of women would find them attractive. But of course as we've seen, these guys (who we once thought had the ideal facial structure for attracting women) have next to no appeal.

Then you have "juggernaut law", which theorizes that even extremely unattractive women receive substantial attention from men. This literally makes 0 sense to me. You don't see this kind of simping for ugly chicks in your day to day activities though, do you? Does everybody at work get hard for the obese, acne-ridden black chick at work, or the hot blonde? Sure, they can hop on some app and be overwhelmed with matches, but reminder that this is because of the extremely skewed gender ratios on apps, which inherently artificially boosts the value of all foids.

TL;DR - Day by day the blackpill is becoming more a meme for me than anything else. It just doesn't make sense. Post vantablackpill material ASAP (No "studies" or OLD "experiments" btw, they don't faze me. They are incredibly dubious and not valid, as they produce conflicting results).

I am not saying looks don't matter you faggots. Ofc looks are extremely important, that's why I'm here trying to looksmax. I'm just losing faith in the more autistic/extreme aspects of blackpill theory, like sub8 law, hypergamy, juggernaut law, etc.

Inb4 cope/username checks out.
100% I agree I see retards saying you have to be 6 psl to fuck 4 psl and I cringe. The slayers I see IRL are 5 psl at most and even then you retards would call them ugly. Be lean, workout, have good skin and be NT. If you want to go up and beyond or you're deformed psl3 get surgery
 
  • +1
Reactions: Effortless, GigaMogger, Copeful and 2 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, GigaMogger, Deleted member 7079 and 2 others
I think this is getting more common in 2020. Looks theory/extreme Blackpill was big some years ago (2015-2018) when it still was in its early stages. The whole idea was rather new and innovative because you rarely saw someone acknowledge the importance of looks, the most popular "internet philosophies" were PUA and other bluepilled stuff, the introduction of the Blackpill was like an "explosive" reaction to the mass indoctrination of the bluepill, it was as if a guy came along and said "hey, slow down, aren't you guys being a bit too optimistic here? You are forgetting how important looks are" . But eventually as the years pass by, the novelty about it fades away, people realize that being frustrated and bitter 24/7 is useless and unnecessarily cortisol inducing and that many things Blackpillers preach about are a bit exaggerated, so they stop taking the Blackpill too seriously, hence why lookism is so bluepilled these days.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, Deleted member 4310, Deleted member 7079 and 1 other person
Looks are very important and will get you girls easily without effort if you are GL enough. That is the essence of the blackpill, that looks effect ALL aspects of well being and success in your life and it's the easiest way to get women.

With that said, MOST people, even GL guys, dont want to autistically slay as many women as possible. Most people, even women, just want to get a LTR with someone around their looks level and they are satisfied. It's only fucking weirdos that are obsessed with "slaying.

Juggernaut theory is very true, and in my experience more average looking to ugly looking girls have MUCH higher body counts than hotter women.

Also Chads are rare IRL post college, out in the real world men and women let themselves go pretty fast and get ugly and fat pretty fast. If you are over 25 and not in college or near one it's extremely rare to ever see a guy that would impress you now that you know about PSL standards. Most women aren't fucking Chad Thundercocks, even for ONSs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, cornerd nerd, Deleted member 5698 and 9 others
Idk I sort of see it the same as red pill, there are some legit points but at the end of the day it’s autistic bullshit made by computer nerds. The blackpill stuff literally started from a couple of tinder experiments. A large amount of it isn’t based in reality. Any dude on here who has been in a social circle or even remotely NT will tell you they see subhumans dating cute girls
Very true about the last part. My friends and cousins are either shorter or worse-looking than me (and some are both at the same time, and would be told "it's over, it never began" on here), yet they got girlfriends and teen love and lost their virginities at age 16-17, while I remain a kissless virgin at 19. And they're not betabuxxing either; as broke, low-status high school and college students.

Of course looks matter, and any of us would trade lives with gigachad the second we got the chance. But that's not possible, and the majority of men aside from the extremes of trucel and gigachad live "take what you can get" lives, which is arguably satisfactory for the purpose we were biologically designed for.

I've only seen about 3 legit 6.5+ PSL men in my whole life (like the type even straight dudes do a double take on), and all were in committed LTRs with looksmatched stacies. Quality over quantity for them, it seems.

Meanwhile, the high body count guys who showed up with a new girl every week were thugmaxxed normies/high tier normies who preferred quantity over quality.

But 'tis just my experiences.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, Amnesia, mulattomaxxer and 4 others
I live in a city with legit male models. Women throw themselves at em you
Must live in a population of 5000
In South Dakota
 
TAGGING MOST BLACKPILLED FAGS ON FORUM:

@DharkDC
@Gosick
@Syobevoli
@Mr.cope
@Vidyacoper
You subscribed to the meme parts of the blackpill. Not a single person who isn't from .co believes in sub 8 law and even on .co, it's always being made fun off. Juggernaut law and hypergamy is much real tho. Every year, theres always stories about some successful attractive woman who can't find a man. Women can't be celibate, so the only logical conclusion is that her standards are too high. I mean, hypergamy has been proven, time and time again. Before religion, for every 1 man, 17 women reproduced.

Juggernaut law, no real way to prove this, but if you really think about it, it makes a whole bunch of sense. The definition is that "uglier/average women have more smv than attractive" or that women within 1 standard deviation or 34 percentile, to 68 percentile women are having more sex than the people in 95.5+ percentile. normie women see the validation stacy gets from simply existing, so they become insecure, and the decide the only way to match the validation stacy gets, is if she lowers her standards of sex. Thus, instead of making someone wait till the 3rd or 4th date to fuck, she let them fuck 1st date, and thus through sex, she is validated. From the male POV, men are generally realistic, so instead of hitting on stacy, who has so much options, they'd move to normie and ugly women, who in their mind has "less options", subconsciously. Trust me, you're gonna have an easier time nutting to sarah jay porn than lana rhoades, why? because in your mind (if you aren't a narcy faggot), it's too unrealistic for you to self insert yourself fucking lana rhoades, than sarah jay.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5698, dachad, Amnesia and 5 others
This whole thread is lifefuel.
In summary looks matter but certain aspects of the blackpill are memes like the sub 8 law, women are still thots and you can't lay your guard down around them or let them use you, and you should still try to looksmax because it benefits you in general and not only with women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dachad, Deleted member 7079, Deleted member 5393 and 1 other person
In upper class everyone is either above average or chadlite...
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7079, Deleted member 4310 and Copeful
This whole thread is lifefuel.
In summary looks matter but certain aspects of the blackpill are memes like the sub 8 law, women are still thots and you can't lay your guard down around them or let them use you, and you should still try to looksmax because it benefits you in general and not only with women.

Glad you liked the thread son. If any fag barks “muh bro it’s over, look at x study and y experiment” just “agree” that it’s over and move on.

Don’t even waste time arguing with them, it’s not worth the cortisol increase tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7192
@Yuyevon What do u think about this tbh? I know you have some doubts about the blackpill as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5393 and Deleted member 4310
looks theory/redpill is legit in that looks are important...

but most guys IRL are subhumans tbh. tons of manlets, framecels and recessed guys.

just think about it... T levels have decreased 50% since 1960 and E levels are high + makeup. So girls are much hotter than guys


im happy that most guys are subhuman twinks, would be brutal competition if there was tons of chads
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4106, Deleted member 7079, Copeful and 1 other person
:bluepill: moment
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4464

I am not saying looks don't matter you faggots. Ofc looks are extremely important, that's why I'm here trying to looksmax.


AE5CA37C 0C81 492E 925C 3F7FB6AC7BCF
AE5CA37C 0C81 492E 925C 3F7FB6AC7BCF
AE5CA37C 0C81 492E 925C 3F7FB6AC7BCF


DID YOU EVEN READ THE POST?? DOES THAT SOUND BLUEPILLED TO YOU, DONKEY??

IM BLUEPILLED FOR QUESTIONING THE EXTREMELY AUTISTIC TENETS OF BLACKPILL THEORY? JUST LOL AT YOUR DELUSION

FUCK OFF MY THREAD IDIOT. >100 IQ ONLY
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: mulattomaxxer
Bump. Can you explain these theories to me? I know you believe in them

@Enigmatic93
 
Bump. Can you explain these theories to me? I know you believe in them

@Enigmatic93
I don't know how you can even deny juggernaut law tbh. If all the online experiements don't "phase" you and are "dubious" Just to any ghetto and look at all the fat ugly sheboons that have multiple kids that all look different because they have different fathers. Someone is having sex with these beasts.

Also in almost all animal mating documentaries the females are described as being very picky despite being plain looking yet being guaranteed to reproduce. Males don't get that same guarantee. What makes you think humans are different? Spoiler alert: they're not.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 616, Amnesia and Copeful
I don't know how you can even deny juggernaut law tbh. If all the online experiements don't "phase" you and are "dubious" Just to any ghetto and look at all the fat ugly sheboons that have multiple kids. Someone is having sex with these beasts.

Also in almost all animal mating documentaries the females are described as being very picky despite being plain looking yet being guaranteed to reproduce.

Because those are the ghettos. That environment is incomparable.

Again, do you get hard for hot girls or subhumans? The only place subhuman girls have any value is online, where skewed gender ratios work in their favor. That’s it.

They are invisible to me, you, and everybody else IRL.

And yes, none of the Tinder “experiments”/studies will influence my reasoning. The parameters (e.g gender ratios, types of girls on the app (Tinder attracts mostly sluts looking for hookups)) are simply inapplicable and they always give conflicting results. It is not logical to extrapolate the general behavior of the entire female species on this basis.
 

Similar threads

sadcel
Replies
36
Views
546
sadcel
sadcel
SvtvnTr14d
Replies
43
Views
638
SvtvnTr14d
SvtvnTr14d
Faiz
Replies
34
Views
593
Faiz
Faiz
Swancel
Replies
1
Views
205
larpcel
larpcel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top