Love is completely contradictory to evolutionary theory

[Deleted member 5927]

Love makes absolutely zero sense from a naturalistic world view

All we are is the longest tag team game of all time, a copy of a copy of a copy of the original protagonists.

It's all a competition, the most rigged players get together and try to make even more rigged players by combining their inherent genetic advantages so make their offspring even more overpowered.

Life is about mogging, thats literally one of the main purposes. Chad is only treated like a god because he walks among normies, normies are the standard, Chad is far above the standard, as a result he isn't a man, but a deity.

Love makes no fucking sense from a naturalistic point of view. Love as normies put it, is the attraction to the other person for a common struggle you have been through, or exposure theory.

It's bullshit. If love were an actual brain process humans were evolved to have, we would have died a long time ago.

Think about it, if Stacy fell in love with the local subhuman for his amazing personality, what would happen to the future generations hundreds of years later? It would be an entire community of subhumans. Love makes no sense, it's not a natural brain process.

We are run by our instincts, dopamine is a reward system so that you are a slave to serving your bodies functions. If love did exist, it would be counterproductive to the development of the human race.

In conclusion, all this shit we have learned about love, one partner that is "the one", the perfect girl, the ability to like a person for their personality alone, it's all shit that humans made up to cope with the reality of the brutal naturalistic world. It's the same as religion, it's an idealistic way of looking at things rather than the way things actually are.

I wish love existed, I really do, but it doesn't fit into the naturalistic model at all. What does this mean?

get looks or die tryin'

 

[WadlowMaxxing]

who hurt u

 

[karbo]

best of the best tier thread hands down.

 

[Deleted member 3020]

i love ur mom

 

[Deleted member 9003]

Cope. It’s called Oxytocin

 

[Tony]

Cope. It’s called Oxtyocin

till i die

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Another shitty thread from an edgy hapa

Love is a chemical most niggas think it’s a feeling but it’s more of a drug

 

[Deleted member 685]

Suddenly psl members should be considered credible evolution biologists.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

I love Eva

imagine her looking at u like that there. Love truly exists

 

[Tony]

I love Eva

till i die

 

[Deleted member 8616]

Humans have evolved past the point of being threatened with extinction if they don't produce good babies and based on your theory, chads would be 7ft ogres not some prettyboy jfl
Looks are obviously very important, but today, since we live comfortably and safe, other things matter as well. Basically LMS.

 

[Deleted member 3323]

Cope. It’s called Oxytocin

who hurt u

I love Eva

imagine her looking at u like that there. Love truly exists
View attachment 877501

 

[Deleted member 3323]

I would've worded it differently but you're right, native. Love is not evolutionarily viable. Yes, we have oxytocin, dopamine, and such but those are fleeting chemicals. They're designed to increase our mating success but to be attached to one partner for long just isn't how evolution works, we move on to find more mates so we can spread our seed further. Imagine if a man died or a woman died, would it be feasible for a member of the species to stay sad on that one mate and refuse to get another one? No, we would die out.

 

[Deleted member 5927]

Humans have evolved past the point of being threatened with extinction if they don't produce good babies and based on your theory, chads would be 7ft ogres not some prettyboy jfl
Looks are obviously very important, but today, since we live comfortably and safe, other things matter as well. Basically LMS.

why do we see zero such cases of love in the animal kingdom? love is just the strong immediate desire of a sexual partner, not the urge to have sex (lust), but the urge to be with them.

"love" in the typical normie definition, does not exist. if you were to say a chemical called oxycotin, which purpose is to bring you closer with a female (probably has to do with the proper development of your children, sticking around to raise him, etc), then i would agree.
everything goes back to reproduction, there is nothing more.

 

[Deleted member 9837]

best of the best tier thread hands down.

If he provided statistics and went more in depth it would be

a dude on lookism already did this and went extremely in-depth its in the legit threads there on lookism

 

[Deleted member 5927]

If he provided statistics and went more in depth it would be

aint nobody got time for that tbh, pretty soy that the difference between a best thread and one that will be forgotten is a bunch of charts

 

[Deleted member 9837]

aint nobody got time for that tbh, pretty soy that the difference between a best thread and one that will be forgotten is a bunch of charts

If you want people to agree with you and actually have a valid talking point to go off of you gotta at least do that.

that’s what makes blackpill science so brutal is because they actually back it up

a dude on lookism like I said already went way way more in depth then you on this subject and actually provided hard proof

you have to destroy copes with proof

 

[Deleted member 5927]

If you want people to agree with you and actually have a valid talking point to go off of you gotta at least do that.

that’s what makes blackpill science so brutal is because they actually back it up

a dude on lookism like I said already went way way more in depth then you on this subject and actually provided hard proof

you have to destroy copes with proof

note taken brocel, ill do more research next time. i just think of shit randomly thru the day and wanted to make a thread, thought i would try to make it look better so more ppl would read

 

[Ritalincel]

 

[Deleted member 8616]

why do we see zero such cases of love in the animal kingdom? love is just the strong immediate desire of a sexual partner, not the urge to have sex (lust), but the urge to be with them.

"love" in the typical normie definition, does not exist. if you were to say a chemical called oxycotin, which purpose is to bring you closer with a female (probably has to do with the proper development of your children, sticking around to raise him, etc), then i would agree.
everything goes back to reproduction, there is nothing more.

Humanity does everything differently than the animal kingdom, you could make that argument for any aspect of life. Short term love, which is what you are referring to, is indeed caused by brain chemicals and in the modern world doesn't lead to reproduction. Long term love is a different story though.
Humans need to be with someone, they cannot survive alone. Therefore they find a parter they share their life with. Also don't forget that even many animal species stay with their partner for life.

 

[Enfant terrible]

I love Eva

imagine her looking at u like that there. Love truly exists
View attachment 877501

Tyrone only

 

[Deleted member 8576]

Love as normies put it, is the attraction to the other person for a common struggle you have been through, or exposure theory.

this usually isn’t how they put it, usually normies say love is just when you and some person have something in common, bond, and learn to appreciate each other and admire one another for their flaws and accomplishments, not just common struggle.

if Stacy fell in love with the local subhuman for his amazing personality, what would happen to the future generations hundreds of years later? It would be an entire community of subhumans.

genetic recombination has shown ugly people can get with good looking people and make non subhumans, but your example debunks itself, because a species only goal is to just breed and breed so that it never goes extinct. your example shows a stacy creating an entire community, and even if they’re subhumans by nature’s standards, this would be a massive success because the genes were spread successfully.

It's the same as religion, it's an idealistic way of looking at things rather than the way things actually are.

love is chemicals so technically it does exist, unlike religion which is fabrication almost entirely. (inb4 @werty1457 debate)

i agree love isn’t what normies say it is but those are my thoughts. nature only favors what fucks the most, if the genes end up not being ideal but the lesser ideal animals breed more then the entire species keeps going but with less than ideal genes, and ironically enough, in such a scenario, the ideal genes were actually NOT ideal because they simply couldn’t propagate. nature has no direction other than sex.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

Tyrone only

no.

Eva is white and latino only jfl. She never called someone else who wasnt it attractive/good looking compared to whites/latinos where she has said they are.

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

Pair bonding is present in lots of mammals. They dont love each other but there are many mammals who will stay together in a monogamous relationship their whole life. It makes perfect sense. With humans, women dont love but men definitely do. This also makes sense because man is smart enough to have a complex emption like love and love is also very beneficial for his offspring

 

[Enfant terrible]

no.

Shes white and latino only jfl. She never called someone else who wasnt it attractive/good looking compared to whites/latinos where she has said they are.

The point that you even know this tells me its over
stop simping for her

 

[Deleted member 8616]

Pair bonding is present in lots of mammals. They dont love each other but there are many mammals who will stay together in a monogamous relationship their whole life. It makes perfect sense. With humans, women dont love but men definitely do. This also makes sense because man is smart enough to have a complex emption like love and love is also very beneficial for his offspring

Women love too jfk

 

[Deleted member 6723]

The point that you even know this tells me its over
stop simping for her

im not simping for Eva. Literally never gave her money, buy her merch or did something for her.

I know I have no chance with her I literally dont care if she gets with someone. Anyways her prime is over and her prime is what I like.

 

[magnificentcel]

Dn rd
It’s a chemical called oxytocin.

 

[WadlowMaxxing]

im not simping for Eva. Literally never gave her money, buy her merch or did something for her.

I know I have no chance with her I literally dont care if she gets with someone. Anyways her prime is over and her prime is what I like.

she doesn't know u exist bro

 

[Enfant terrible]

im not simping for Eva. Literally never gave her money, buy her merch or did something for her.

I know I have no chance with her I literally dont care if she gets with someone. Anyways her prime is over and her prime is what I like.

Isnt she 17
JFL

 

[Deleted member 6723]

she doesn't know u exist bro

I literally dont give a fuck that Eva doesnt know I exist bro just stfu.

 

[Deleted member 3073]

Love is real. You just haven't experienced it yet. At least from a male point of view, it is.

Idk how women feel love though, like if they feel it the same way. I suppose they do.​

 

[Deleted member 10536]

Love makes absolutely zero sense from a naturalistic world view



View attachment 877476​

All we are is the longest tag team game of all time, a copy of a copy of a copy of the original protagonists.

It's all a competition, the most rigged players get together and try to make even more rigged players by combining their inherent genetic advantages so make their offspring even more overpowered.

Life is about mogging, thats literally one of the main purposes. Chad is only treated like a god because he walks among normies, normies are the standard, Chad is far above the standard, as a result he isn't a man, but a deity.

Love makes no fucking sense from a naturalistic point of view. Love as normies put it, is the attraction to the other person for a common struggle you have been through, or exposure theory.

It's bullshit. If love were an actual brain process humans were evolved to have, we would have died a long time ago.

Think about it, if Stacy fell in love with the local subhuman for his amazing personality, what would happen to the future generations hundreds of years later? It would be an entire community of subhumans. Love makes no sense, it's not a natural brain process.

We are run by our instincts, dopamine is a reward system so that you are a slave to serving your bodies functions. If love did exist, it would be counterproductive to the development of the human race.

In conclusion, all this shit we have learned about love, one partner that is "the one", the perfect girl, the ability to like a person for their personality alone, it's all shit that humans made up to cope with the reality of the brutal naturalistic world. It's the same as religion, it's an idealistic way of looking at things rather than the way things actually are.

I wish love existed, I really do, but it doesn't fit into the naturalistic model at all. What does this mean?

get looks or die tryin'

You've never felt love. You just don't understand it.

 

[Deleted member 643]

That's not how love is defined

 

[Deleted member 5969]

this usually isn’t how they put it, usually normies say love is just when you and some person have something in common, bond, and learn to appreciate each other and admire one another for their flaws and accomplishments, not just common struggle.

genetic recombination has shown ugly people can get with good looking people and make non subhumans, but your example debunks itself, because a species only goal is to just breed and breed so that it never goes extinct. your example shows a stacy creating an entire community, and even if they’re subhumans by nature’s standards, this would be a massive success because the genes were spread successfully.

love is chemicals so technically it does exist, unlike religion which is fabrication almost entirely. (inb4 @werty1457 debate)

i agree love isn’t what normies say it is but those are my thoughts. nature only favors what fucks the most, if the genes end up not being ideal but the lesser ideal animals breed more then the entire species keeps going but with less than ideal genes, and ironically enough, in such a scenario, the ideal genes were actually NOT ideal because they simply couldn’t propagate. nature has no direction other than sex.

Caged at you

 

[Deleted member 5969]

Love is real you retards

 

[Deleted member 5927]

whole lot of cope in this thread love doesn't exist it's just a chemical reaction

 

[Deleted member 5927]

You've never felt love. You just don't understand it.

how the fuck does experiencing love at all explain what it is. everything you "feel" is just a chemical reaction, that's how the brain works. whether it's a chemical or a mixture of chemicals, it's a chemical reaction occuring.

it doesn't fit in the grand scheme of things. it does not fit in the evolutionary model. the scientific models NEVER explain "love" as a factor, because it's simply not. life is about reproduction and that's pure physical desire.

 

[Deleted member 5927]

Another shitty thread from an edgy hapa

Love is a chemical most niggas think it’s a feeling but it’s more of a drug

shut the fuck up dumb nigger calling my threads bad. reminder that your post to rep ratio is shit because your posts are worse than mine, and half the fucking dogshit posts in offtopic are worse than this.

 

[Deleted member 10536]

how the fuck does experiencing love at all explain what it is. everything you "feel" is just a chemical reaction, that's how the brain works. whether it's a chemical or a mixture of chemicals, it's a chemical reaction occuring.

it doesn't fit in the grand scheme of things. it does not fit in the evolutionary model. the scientific models NEVER explain "love" as a factor, because it's simply not. life is about reproduction and that's pure physical desire.

Yes, it is chemicals, I never said otherwise. Still, you've never experienced love. Simple as that. I've never felt anything more pleasurable than love. Maybe heroin is better, never tried though.

 

[Swolepenisman]

Hence why evolution is just one theory tbh ngl

 

[Deleted member 5927]

Yes, it is chemicals, I never said otherwise. Still, you've never experienced love. Simple as that. I've never felt anything more pleasurable than love. Maybe heroin is better, never tried though.

then what are you disagreeing with me here. you are saying the same thing i am, that love does not exist, it's just a chemical, and that long lasting love is impossible and just another bluepilled cope.

what are you going on about

 

[Deleted member 10536]

then what are you disagreeing with me here. you are saying the same thing i am, that love does not exist, it's just a chemical, and that long lasting love is impossible and just another bluepilled cope.

what are you going on about

You've never experienced love, so you don't understand it. It exists.

 

[Deleted member 5927]

Hence why evolution is just one theory tbh ngl

ill be honest, the evidence for evolution is really wanky and dogshit and incomplete as fuck for how much they push it. literally all of modern science revolves around the earth being millions of years old and evolution being the main driving factor for the creation of life. but at the same time the evidence is fucking shit, and im not saying this because i don't know the "modern evidence" im saying this because i do, and im hardly convinced. even Australopithecus "Lucy" is literally a 40% complete fucking FRAGMENTED skeleton and we base all of our shit off of her.

as you can see, there's no skull, no hands, no feet, hardly anything at fucking all. all the important shit is missing. monkeys, for example, have thumbs on their feet. humans do not. if lucy was an actual transitional fossil (half "modern man", half ape), you would expect her to have some sort of half thumb half foot on her appendages. But "COINCIDENTALLY" the best evidence for evolution has no fucking evidence.

of course they never tell you this shit or even talk about, i don't fucking know why, those cocksuckers would rather larp about evolution being the truth of the universe rather than just actually think if other options might be true. truly infuriating because I actually care about the truth and want to follow the correct worldview (because my entire ethics would change if for example, God did exist).

But instead they choose to larp and trick Normies into thinking evolution is this highly backed up, almost confirmed theory, when in reality it's just a well thought out "guess".

in conclusion:barely any modern worldview has evidence, it's over, im an agnostic.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

shut the fuck up dumb nigger calling my threads bad. reminder that your post to rep ratio is shit because your posts are worse than mine, and half the fucking dogshit posts in offtopic are worse than this.

Your post to rep ratio is better simply because you appeal to the people here you make threads on giving up and shit.

I’m real and call out niggas in their BS and shit thread

 

[Swolepenisman]

ill be honest, the evidence for evolution is really wanky and dogshit and incomplete as fuck for how much they push it. literally all of modern science revolves around the earth being millions of years old and evolution being the main driving factor for the creation of life. but at the same time the evidence is fucking shit, and im not saying this because i don't know the "modern evidence" im saying this because i do, and im hardly convinced. even Australopithecus "Lucy" is literally a 40% complete fucking FRAGMENTED skeleton and we base all of our shit off of her.

View attachment 877630

as you can see, there's no skull, no hands, no feet, hardly anything at fucking all. all the important shit is missing. monkeys, for example, have thumbs on their feet. humans do not. if lucy was an actual transitional fossil (half "modern man", half ape), you would expect her to have some sort of half thumb half foot on her appendages. But "COINCIDENTALLY" the best evidence for evolution has no fucking evidence.

of course they never tell you this shit or even talk about, i don't fucking know why, those cocksuckers would rather larp about evolution being the truth of the universe rather than just actually think if other options might be true. truly infuriating because I actually care about the truth and want to follow the correct worldview (because my entire ethics would change if for example, God did exist).

But instead they choose to larp and trick Normies into thinking evolution is this highly backed up, almost confirmed theory, when in reality it's just a well thought out "guess".

in conclusion:barely any modern worldview has evidence, it's over, im an agnostic.

I think there are 4 possible things tbh

 

[Deleted member 5927]

You've never experienced love, so you don't understand it. It exists.

you are literally saying the same thing i am jfl...

love in the traditional bluepilled sense doesn't exist

oxycotin as others pointed out, is a named scientific chemical compound that has affects on your mental state

love in the bluepilled sense, and "love" in the oxycotin sense, are not at all the same thing.

 

[Deleted member 5927]

Your post to rep ratio is better simply because you appeal to the people here you make threads on giving up and shit.

I’m real and call out niggas in their BS and shit thread

if all you are is a thread critiquer, then i hardly give a fuck about your opinion. you literally just told me all you do is talk shit jfl.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

if all you are is a thread critiquer, then i hardly give a fuck about your opinion. you literally just told me all you do is talk shit jfl.

I read half then gave up

Cool or whatever

 

[Deleted member 5927]

I read half then gave up

Cool or whatever

keep larping, i know you read every fucking word. i own you.