Deleted member 11035
Normie face decent frame
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2020
- Posts
- 173
- Reputation
- 309
A lot of you read the shit on black pill science Reddit and are convinced good looks are by and far the most important factor for getting laid. But that simply isn't true. The problem with black pill science is that they just cherry-pick shit or only show the abstract of the paper which doesn't get into the details of a paper.
For example, take this paper https://www.jstor.org/stable/3812964?seq=1. Reading the abstract you'd think looks are one of the most important contributors to getting laid. But it isn't. It turns out being low inhib is far more important than looks. In fact, looks ranked at the bottom for the long-term number of partners, however, it was important for the short-term number of partners in a single month.
Flaws with my argument: The study was in the 90s when social media and tinder didn't fuck everything up so. Also, attractiveness still correlates and low inhib doesn't matter if you're below 3.5 psl. Also, the study doesn't take race into account so if you're Asian the psl requirement for low inhib to work may be higher (like 4.5-5 psl were for whites its 3.5-4 psl)
For example, take this paper https://www.jstor.org/stable/3812964?seq=1. Reading the abstract you'd think looks are one of the most important contributors to getting laid. But it isn't. It turns out being low inhib is far more important than looks. In fact, looks ranked at the bottom for the long-term number of partners, however, it was important for the short-term number of partners in a single month.
Flaws with my argument: The study was in the 90s when social media and tinder didn't fuck everything up so. Also, attractiveness still correlates and low inhib doesn't matter if you're below 3.5 psl. Also, the study doesn't take race into account so if you're Asian the psl requirement for low inhib to work may be higher (like 4.5-5 psl were for whites its 3.5-4 psl)

?