LUST has been OVER EMPHASIZED in our society and its BAD

maxxedfalloutdweller

maxxedfalloutdweller

intp, big dick tiny man
Joined
Jul 14, 2020
Posts
5,616
Reputation
7,649
I having been scrolling through the many areas of this forum, clicked on many links, watched plenty of tiktok videos, procrastinated on youtube and the idea that sex/sex appeal sells is becoming more and more true.

Im pretty sure everyone on this forum knows this but I want to talk about it a lot more in depth and I want to talk about how it has MANY negatives.

Before I start I want to give credit to @Matheus for inspiring me to make this with his recent thread “why tinder isnt reality” https://looksmax.org/threads/why-tinder-isnt-reality.267035/
this played a major role to help put things into perspective.

In this thread he talks about “perceived signals of value” and how LOOKS, and NTness are some of the major signals of value for a man on tinder and how women that go after these traits use them as an guess to his value since they can only invest a certain amount of time into each man’s profile. He than goes on to argue that this is not how things work in reality and there are many more variables that come into play in regards to a women finding a man attractive IRL.

I cant do much to dispute this because he is correct tinder isn’t real life. But near the end of his post he opens up the door for the possibility that tinder could carry on to real life if the women that join tinder, develop a mindset where they are prone to rely to much on perceived signals without taking anything else into account. And this is where my theory comes into play.

I would like to add on to what he said by emphasizing that men can also rely too much on perceived signals of value and it can be just as bad as women doing it and that tinder is closer to reality due to the hypergamous nature of people in society that try to get with those that have the highest amount of perceived value.

I will explain: tiktok, youtube, instagram, porn, triple A films, magazines, what do they all have in common.
People involved use sex appeal to catch the eye of the watcher.
It’s one of If not THE EASIEST WAY TO GET ATTENTION it takes very little effort on the performer side and it catches a lot of eyes.
And who do they use?
A conventionally attractive white woman/man

They are the zenith of physical beauty in the west (after all they do have the highest amount of perceived value).

but they don’t always have to be white indeed this is starting to change more and more by the days. But one thing that’s hasn’t changed is that they must be SHOWING SKIN or WEARING CLOTHES THAT EMPHASIZED THEIR FIGURE in order to get the attention of men and women.

We are BOMBARDED with the stereotypical image of an attractive man/women every day on multiple media platforms and after years it becomes so cemented in culture to the point where if you see someone that doesnt look like that being sexualized your brain might throw an error.

Its a real killer to the self esteem for many people and it creates a MASSIVE PYGMALION EFFECT that is cemented through culture.
im not trying to sound like some leftist snow flake, but if you want to talk about the issues with perceived value this is definitely an issue that needs to be addressed.
The fact that a degenerate girl showing her ass on tiktok and instagram has more attention that a woman studying to be a lawyer goes to show you where we are heading in society. And the same goes for men, the handsome athletes getting way more attention that the nerdy stem majors.

This confusion of value is also the same reason why young girls are starting to sexualize themselves earlier and earlier as the time goes on. And why they start to show more skin early on , they are trying to find ways to get the attention of the opposite sex, they are trying to find ways to feel good about themselves they want to feel as wanted as the hot girls on those magazine covers.

And this is the real kicker it DOESNT MATTER HOW GOOD OF A PARENT SOMEONE IS, THEIR CHILDREN WILL STILL BE AT THE WILL OF THE BEAUTY STANDARDS OF THEIR TIME. THE GIRLS/BOYS WANT THE ATTENTION OF THE OPPOSITION/SAME SEX and what easier way to get it than sexualize yourself.

Hyper sexualization screws over people in the long run by giving them this false idea that looks= value

It tells you since a guy is wearing a t shirt that shows his pecs and biceps = high value in every way
It tells you since a girl has thick thighs and a nice ass = high value in every way.

this is a major issue that will effect relationships on a large scale.
We are literally creating an environment where we say the only thing that matters is looks much like “tinder”

now many people are here on this forum are young enough and hopefully intelligent enough to understand this but for anyone under the age of 14 this might go over their head entirely. Just think about how our culture will effect their brain subconsciously.

Tl; dr : hyper sexualizing in culture is giving people the wrong ideas on what matters in people and it is causing harm on a mass scale.
Especially for people that may not have those traits to benefit from it.

@ArvidGustavsson @Proex @PYT @kjsbdfiusdf @GreenTea @jewce @Matheus @higgabigga @AlwaysHaveQuestions @Bigbeefius @BIGDICCJIM @Hozay @Thongmaster @Hightwolf @SubhumanCurrycel @TheoryMaxxer
@copingvolcel
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 2205, Deleted member 2597, yonmaxxed and 29 others
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: owlofathena, yonmaxxed, jake_okok and 12 others
another reason why asexuals are superior
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: PhuccinManlet, magnificentcel, Chadrapist and 2 others
The world needs shariah law
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: The Moggee, Deleted member 4797, Deleted member 5608 and 2 others
Not that I fully disagree but it is true to an extent
It tells you since a guy is wearing a t shirt that shows his pecs and biceps = high value in every way
It tells you since a girl has thick thighs and a nice ass = high value in every way.
Believe it or not but a shoulder:waist:hip ratio in women has been found to be a universally constant indicator of fertility ranging from depictions of goddesses in the Mesopotamian era to Roman fertility dolls.
In males a large shoulder:waist ratio and musculature indicates good health and dimorphism.
These traits aren’t arbitrary yes they are pushed to an even greater extent nowadays by media but this behaviour is hardwired
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2205, Deleted member 9819, PrisonMike and 2 others
With lust there is no love
Bro no they are different you can have love for some one without having sexual desire.
Alot of old couples that have been married for YEARS have a lot of love but not a lot of lust.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6531 and f0rmless
Not that I fully disagree but it is true to an extent

Believe it or not but a shoulder:waist:hip ratio in women has been found to be a universally constant indicator of fertility ranging from depictions of goddesses in the Mesopotamian era to Roman fertility dolls.
In males a large shoulder:waist ratio and musculature indicates good health and dimorphism.
These traits aren’t arbitrary yes they are pushed to an even greater extent nowadays by media but this behaviour is hardwired
Im not denying that in fact its ok to like those things but i dont like how it literally every where you look and how its so sexualized. Edit :Thats one of my issues
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2205, Deleted member 6111, f0rmless and 1 other person
The jews
 
  • +1
Reactions: Leviathin
7AFB327D 8242 405A 9842 7831CF80DD77

979D9C63 7301 4523 8B3F A6DBF233770F
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: TITUS, ConspiracyTheory and Deleted member 6403
What you are not understanding is while a lot of this is us being socially constructed into finding certain types of dress code and styling more attractive, all social media is really doing is playing on our primal instincts as either men or women.

Primal for a woman is well known on here as being big skulled, wide framed, thick necked, wide eyed, strong jawed and good muscle insertions and separation. The style plays on this.

Primal for men is well known as good fat distribution around the wast/hips, legs and bum and this is overemphasised by photo shopped pics of women who appear as having an abnormal amount of junk in their trunk while having little to not fat in their abdomen and arm region. Where do we stick the penis? And the penis curves up so you want that stick out.

This is primal instincts finding style. Or style finding primal instincts. As you play to the consumer.

You can talk as much as you like about social construction, but the truth is given the choice we always will follow our primal instincts. Before social media we didn't have that choice. Now we do and fashion brands etc play on it.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Vvvvxxxx, magnificentcel, Deleted member 6723 and 1 other person
What you are not understanding is while a lot of this is us being socially constructed into finding certain types of dress code and styling more attractive, all social media is really doing is playing on our primal instincts as either men or women.

Primal for a woman is well known on here as being big skulled, wide framed, thick necked, wide eyed, strong jaw and good muscle insertions and separation. The style plays on this.

Primal for men is well known as good fat distribution around the wast/hips, legs and bum and this is overemphasised by photo shopped pics of women who appear as having an abnormal amount of junk in their trunk while having little to not fat in their abdomen and arm region. Where do we stick the penis? And the penis curves up so you want that stick out.

This primal instincts finding style. Or style finding primal instincts. As you play to the consumer.

You can talk as much as you like about social construction but the truth is given the voice we would and always will follow our primal instincts. Before social media we didn't have that choice. No we do and fashion brands etc play on it.
There are plenty of other of ways you can be attractive.
I feel like you are using what we find attractive in the present to try and draw some kind of connection to the past through biology but the truth is that What we find attractive is always changing this is not 100% rooted in biology.
You have no idea what was attractive 10,000 years ago either do i
But thats besides the point im focusing on how we over emphasis the what we do find sexual in the media.
what is your response to that?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6531 and Subhuman trash
There are plenty of other of ways you can be attractive.
I feel like you are using what we find attractive in the present to try and draw some kind of connection to the past through biology but the truth is that What we find attractive is always changing this is not 100% rooted in biology.
You have no idea what was attractive 10,000 years ago either do i
But thats besides the point im focusing on how we over emphasis the what we do find sexual in the media.
what is your response to that?
yes bro what looks aesthetic is rooted in evolution. We still are going through it rn. But changing the aesthetics standards still take a very long time.
 
yes bro what looks aesthetic is rooted in evolution. We still are going through it rn. But changing the aesthetics standards still take a very long time.
Foids don’t have to have any sort of aesthetic Jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10536
There are plenty of other of ways you can be attractive.
I feel like you are using what we find attractive in the present to try and draw some kind of connection to the past through biology but the truth is that What we find attractive is always changing this is not 100% rooted in biology.
You have no idea what was attractive 10,000 years ago either do i
But thats besides the point im focusing on how we over emphasis the what we do find sexual in the media.
what is your response to that?

I just don't agree with that.

Tall, wide framed, thick necked, muscular and chiseled faces have existed for centuries and centuries dude. Women loved them always.

The only difference back then is they didn't have an easy choice and/or chance of getting them. Then survival for a woman was far more important.

Bitch can survive on her own now and through many means.

There was more emphasis on breasts in the 70s and 80s and even 90s. I know because I grew up partly in the 90s. It switched to ass a lot because of ghetto and ghetto music culture with hip hop etc. Jennifer Lopez was one of the iconic catalysts for this change, but if you look back at shows like Baywatch you will see women making it on the cast too then had very accentuated ass curves. So it's always been a part of an essential female attractive trait. Baywatch was a late 80s and entire 90s show BTW
 
There are plenty of other of ways you can be attractive.
I feel like you are using what we find attractive in the present to try and draw some kind of connection to the past through biology but the truth is that What we find attractive is always changing this is not 100% rooted in biology.
You have no idea what was attractive 10,000 years ago either do i
But thats besides the point im focusing on how we over emphasis the what we do find sexual in the media.
what is your response to that?
Yea I mean evolution or whatever existed in the boomer era just as now. Society has just got gynocentric as fuck like many incels wouldn’t have been pre smartphone
 
Foids don’t have to have any sort of aesthetic Jfl
by aesthetic i dont mean like those styles shit.

I mean this
aes·thet·ic
/esˈTHedik/

adjective
adjective: aesthetic; adjective: esthetic

• giving or designed to give pleasure through beauty; of pleasing appearance.
 
yes bro what looks aesthetic is rooted in evolution. We still are going through it rn. But changing the aesthetics standards still take a very long time.
The only think that is probably rootef in evolution is hip to waist ratio , waist to hip ratio and height as well as face. But the emphasis on these things probably weren’t as high as they are now especially over large geographical areas . Thats just my guess though
 
OK

Show me the bodily differences between the late 80s and entire 90s and now, other than more emphasis on fatter asses and thicker legs? Big lips for a woman was essential even back then.

What differences in the guys do you see other than a lack of beard fraud on show?







I understand what you are saying. You are saying that our primal instincts are evolving genetically through the generations. Right? The evidence however shows it hasn't changed much. We still refer to the Greek bod as the perfect aesthetic for a man and every woman will agree.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723
The only think that is probably rootef in evolution is hip to waist ratio , waist to hip ratio and height as well as face. But the emphasis on these things probably weren’t as high as they are now especially over large geographical areas . Thats just my guess though
nah almost every feature has some evolutionary thing behind it.

Dark hair = dark triad since it reminds us of the night

jbw = colonization so they look high class/powerful
blue eyes = great contrast which we always find aesthetic
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2597, magnificentcel, Deleted and 1 other person
I just don't agree with that.

Tall, wide framed, thick necked, muscular and chiseled faces have existed for centuries and centuries dude. Women loved them always.
You are a fucking idiot if believe this.

im Not even going to go on because i know this is going to spiral into some fuckery.
But you are just wrong.
 
You are a fucking idiot if believe this.

im Not even going to go on because i know this is going to spiral into some fuckery.
But you are just wrong.
its true wtf are u saying.

not wrong at all tf. Maybe they found fat ppl more attractive b4 but thats because they look rich. If u were rich and had greek god body im sure they would find it more attractive.
 
nah almost every feature has some evolutionary thing behind it.

Dark hair = dark triad since it reminds us of the night

jbw = colonization so they look high class/powerful
blue eyes = great contrast which we always find aesthetic
Just fucking lol at this shit @Proex i expected more from you.
 
You are a fucking idiot if believe this.

im Not even going to go on because i know this is going to spiral into some fuckery.
But you are just wrong.

You showed your lack of character and intellectual ability by breaking your fake pseudo intellectual frame at the drop of a hat.

Somebody disagrees with you and for good reason with evidence to support their view and you choose to call him a fucking idiot because you can't debate and present reasons for your argument. You have provided nothing concrete.

You do actually sound like a Liberal. Much like a leftist you see what you want to see and then get emotionally hysterical when someone beats you for hard facts and evidence, using objective thinking. A lot like a feminist. A female feminist. What a true dick head lol

You pretentious twerp.

Your entire argument is "muh evolution" and "muh social engineering". Classic talentless cookie cutter. You remind of how gays and trannies justify their sexuality by saying; "what we find attractive is indoctrinated into us and I just haven't been manipulated".

I wouldn't be surprised if you were a flat assed girl larping as a guy on here and I am being deadly serious. It all adds up.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: The Moggee, maxxedfalloutdweller and Deleted member 6723
its true wtf are u saying.

not wrong at all tf. Maybe they found fat ppl more attractive b4 but thats because they look rich. If u were rich and had greek god body im sure they would find it more attractive.

Lol how do you explain the ancient Greek god body? Why was this loved? Think. You daft fuck.

The person you are talking to is a mentally hurt female feminist posting on a male message board, that is finding it hard to live in today's society with the constant inadvertant pressures social media puts on her to look thick and look shaped. She is likely a flat chested no aased bitch.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: maxxedfalloutdweller and Deleted member 6723
The only difference back then is they didn't have an easy choice and/or chance of getting them.
AND THAT my friend is the point , back in those times you could literally die alone without reproducing however now we re being nuked with dopamine inducing pictures and videos and that is not normal at all , we are valuing characteristics that are not needed anymore .
Greeks literally valued small penises , nothing to do with .me s average length of 9 inches
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6908 and maxxedfalloutdweller
You showed your lack of character and intellectual ability by breaking your fake pseudo intellectual frame at the drop of a hat.

Somebody disagrees with you and for good reason with evidence to support their view and you choose to call him a fucking idiot because you can't debate and present reasons for your argument. You have provided nothing concrete.

You do actually sound like a Liberal. Much like a leftist you see what you want to see and then get emotionally hysterical when someone beats you for hard facts and evidence, using objective thinking. A lot like a feminist. A female feminist. What a true dick head lol

You pretentious twerp.

Your entire argument is "muh evolution" and "muh social engineering". Classic talentless cookie cutter. You remind of how gays and trannies justify their sexuality by saying; "what we find attractive is indoctrinated into us and I just haven't been manipulated".

I wouldn't be surprised if you were a flat assed girl larping as a guy on here and I am being deadly serious. It all adds up.
LEGIT FUCKING CAGED AT THE LAST PART LOL DUDE.

im just not in the mood to talk to you. You come of being very narrow minded and im not even trying to insult. It difficult to have a convo with people that believe that every thing in our current world has has some evolutionary purpose and don’t understand that lust and simple pleasure play a role too, not everything in evolution has to be used as a stepping stone to create a more efficient species through years of evolution.

Also i got mad cuz you said women love thick necked masculine lean faved chads.
like how the fuck can you be on .me and still believe this shit. We have given you countless example On the opposite yet you say this.
I dont understand.
 
AND THAT my friend is the point , back in those times you could literally die alone without reproducing however now we re being nuked with dopamine inducing pictures and videos and that is not normal at all , we are valuing characteristics that are not needed anymore .
Greeks literally valued small penises , nothing to do with .me s average length of 9 inches
THANK YOU look at this fucktard arguing with me callind me a foid
JUST FUCKING LOL at how desperate he is to insult me.
“you are a flat arsed bitch” = “i dont have fuck all to say and im just acting like a disgruntled cunt”
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7651
AND THAT my friend is the point , back in those times you could literally die alone without reproducing however now we re being nuked with dopamine inducing pictures and videos and that is not normal at all , we are valuing characteristics that are not needed anymore .
Greeks literally valued small penises , nothing to do with .me s average length of 9 inches

Bingo.

End of conversation.

Nothing more needs to be said. This thread is fucking stupid. Op is tryna across as some cool hippy on shrooms snd can't tell the basic difference between personal taste/preference and primal sexual instincts, which come from dimorphism.

Everybody but the retarded op knows there is a difference between being beautiful and being sexually dimorphic.
 
Btw i BET ON MY LIFE @MakinItHappen Didnt read my entire post cuz if he did he wouldn’t be saying this retarded shit.
 
THANK YOU look at this fucktard arguing with me callind me a foid
JUST FUCKING LOL at how desperate he is to insult me.
“you are a flat arsed bitch” = “i dont have fuck all to say and im just acting like a disgruntled cunt”

He is agreeing with me and thus disagreeing wtih you you stupid fuck.
 
He is agreeing with me and thus disagreeing wtih you you stupid fuck.
What i am saying is that dimorphic traits are valued way more than other important traits like iq by society when it actually should be the other way around, so you cant really tell me the media isnt playing a role in what we like , just like you said black music made you become an "ass man" even though tits are a better indicator of fertility biologically speaking .

We evolved to become sapiens and now ...
We are going back to monke :lul:
1408626267317 wps 9 World IQ graph jpg
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6908 and maxxedfalloutdweller
What i am saying is that dimorphic traits are valued way more than other important traits like iq by society when it actually should be the other way around, so you cant really tell me the media isnt playing a role in what we like , just like you said black music made you become an "ass man" even though tits are a better indicator of fertility biologically speaking .

We evolved to become sapiens and now ...
We are going back to monke :lul:
View attachment 900551
He is dyslexic dont mind him bro.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7651
High IQ thread tbh glad my thread gave you inspiration.

Western civilisation is doomed unless we turn the current tide but it sure isn't easy. Normie look at me baffled when I tell them that women's emancipation is one of the major factor of our civilisational decline. Not that they disagree because they have no idea but it's just too outside of what they consider opinions. Too far out the Overton window. It doesn't matter because history has shown this in the past, is showing it right now and will prove it right in the future.

On this subject I can only recommend the short essay by Sir John Glubb written in the 40's about how empires come and go following identifiable cycles. The last cycle is the cycle of decadence and is oddly similar to what we live in right now with pervasive lust, increased power of women, etc. The problem is that before western civilisation was shared among multiple empires who fell and rose in succession keeping the civilisation as a whole alive. Now that the western world is almost a single block it could very well fall for good.
PDF Fate of Empires
 
What i am saying is that dimorphic traits are valued way more than other important traits like iq by society when it actually should be the other way around, so you cant really tell me the media isnt playing a role in what we like , just like you said black music made you become an "ass man" even though tits are a better indicator of fertility biologically speaking .

We evolved to become sapiens and now ...
We are going back to monke :lul:
View attachment 900551

Talking of IQ this is a really low IQ post. No offence dude.

Firstly it's not media its social media. Learn how it works. Social.media works like an algorithm and personalises Ads for people. So take for instance if you typically search shit such as Kim Kardashian's bum on twitter, then it is likely that your ADs on twitter will be about air-head celebrities. As the algorithm caters your ADs to your general tastes and those come from? The shit you search. This goes for any form of social media btw. Not just twitter. They all use a 'TRENDING' algorithm which is supplied information petrol on what you search.

Do I need to state the obvious here now? The point is the shit that PEOPLE SEARCH GENERALLY does involve hot/good looking celebrities and guess what? They have sexually dimorphic traits.

So let's establish here that absolutely none of this has ANYTHING to do with the news media. CNN, CBS, SKY, BBC, Aljazeera. Whatever. It's all social media and social media is media which is chosen by the people. That's why it's called social.

NEWSFLASH: MOST PEOPLE SEARCH JUNK ON SOCIAL MEDIA

The news media is not playing the impacting role here and EVEN if they were. Which they aren't. Most people are not high IQ and this is very key to remember you dumb fuck and I say dumb fuck because it's obvious when you break it down. If most people are not high IQ, how do you want MOST PEOPLE to APPRECIATE works of high IQ? They don't understand it. The people, the public, the general population... all they care about is the finished product. That's all. Not how it was made. We have documentaries for that you stupid fuck. Stuff like the natural world or blue planet narrated by the great Sir David Attenborough are popular and shows like that also trend on social media.

Here are the facts:

You are not good looking (Nether am I) and you as a result believe that the reason for you not being where you are at in life is because society has now been programmed to judge you as incompetent based on the way you look. The fact is this isn't true. Society has programmed ITSELF to become like this, through the driving mechanism of social media.

What baffles me is that based on how WRONG you are from what you've said here; you are not too bright. So it is kind of pointless that you want society to reward brains over beauty.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7651
High IQ thread tbh glad my thread gave you inspiration.

Western civilisation is doomed unless we turn the current tide but it sure isn't easy. Normie look at me baffled when I tell them that women's emancipation is one of the major factor of our civilisational decline. Not that they disagree because they have no idea but it's just too outside of what they consider opinions. Too far out the Overton window. It doesn't matter because history has shown this in the past, is showing it right now and will prove it right in the future.

On this subject I can only recommend the short essay by Sir John Glubb written in the 40's about how empires come and go following identifiable cycles. The last cycle is the cycle of decadence and is oddly similar to what we live in right now with pervasive lust, increased power of women, etc. The problem is that before western civilisation was shared among multiple empires who fell and rose in succession keeping the civilisation as a whole alive. Now that the western world is almost a single block it could very well fall for good.
PDF Fate of Empires

It's not a high IQ thread. Not at all. It's teenagers trying to sound smart on the internet but not realising how much of a bunch of fuckwits they are.
 
It's not a high IQ thread. Not at all. It's teenagers trying to sound smart on the internet but not realising how much of a bunch of fuckwits they are.
He's right though, lust is omnipresent in our societies and it isn't something "organic" or normal, it tells us about the state of our current society. This dynamic has shifted signals of value that in the past were closer to the bluepill or redpill (providing ability, capacity to care, etc) towards more superficial and shallow signals (looks, fitness, etc)
 
Talking of IQ this is a really low IQ post. No offence dude.

Firstly it's not media its social media. Learn how it works. Social.media works like an algorithm and personalises Ads for people. So take for instance if you typically search shit such as Kim Kardashian's bum on twitter, then it is likely that your ADs on twitter will be about air-head celebrities. As the algorithm caters your ADs to your general tastes and those come from? The shit you search. This goes for any form of social media btw. Not just twitter. They all use a 'TRENDING' algorithm which is supplied information petrol on what you search.

Do I need to state the obvious here now? The point is the shit that PEOPLE SEARCH GENERALLY does involve hot/good looking celebrities and guess what? They have sexually dimorphic traits.

So let's establish here that absolutely none of this has ANYTHING to do with the news media. CNN, CBS, SKY, BBC, Aljazeera. Whatever. It's all social media and social media is media which is chosen by the people. That's why it's called social.

NEWSFLASH: MOST PEOPLE SEARCH JUNK ON SOCIAL MEDIA

The news media is not playing the impacting role here and EVEN if they were. Which they aren't. Most people are not high IQ and this is very key to remember you dumb fuck and I say dumb fuck because it's obvious when you break it down. If most people are not high IQ, how do you want MOST PEOPLE to APPRECIATE works of high IQ? They don't understand it. The people, the public, the general population... all they care about is the finished product. That's all. Not how it was made. We have documentaries for that you stupid fuck. Stuff like the natural world or blue planet narrated by the great Sir David Attenborough are popular and shows like that also trend on social media.

Here are the facts:

You are not good looking (Nether am I) and you as a result believe that the reason for you not being where you are at in life is because society has now been programmed to judge you as incompetent based on the way you look. The fact is this isn't true. Society has programmed ITSELF to become like this, through the driving mechanism of social media.

What baffles me is that based on how WRONG you are from what you've said here; you are not too bright. So it is kind of pointless that you want society to reward brains over beauty.
the only obvious thing here is that my english is not on your level so i keep it simple instead of writing essays , by media i was referring to both social media and television (news , movies etc.) .
I wanted to write an essay myself right now but this conversation is pointless .

you can literally reprogram you subconscious through repeated thoughts / words and because we are visual beings you can only imagine what repeated images / videos do to you , you are literally proof of it through your experience with hip hop music ...so just know that if you control media you also control minds , it s beyond me how you cant understand such a simple concept.
 
the only obvious thing here is that my english is not on your level so i keep it simple instead of writing essays , by media i was referring to both social media and television (news , movies etc.) .
I wanted to write an essay myself right now but this conversation is pointless .

you can literally reprogram you subconscious through repeated thoughts / words and because we are visual beings you can only imagine what repeated images / videos do to you , you are literally proof of it through your experience with hip hop music ...so just know that if you control media you also control minds , it s beyond me how you cant understand such a simple concept.

Shut the fuck up and stop hiding behind your shit command of the English language

It is bloody irrelevant you mediocre pesantant. Social. Media is ran by a fucking algorithm. That means what people search h and click on will be what is trending. You rumb stupid cunt. Now fuck off.































This is a matter of social media.
Social media is a fucking algorithm.

Get that through to you thick skull you fucking stupid European dummbass

Everything mainstream is controlled by social media. Celebrities and music and shit


Hip hop came onto the scene with asses taking precedent sure. There was no social media so the producer could play on what they thought the consumer would like. Consumer being listener and viewer. The problem with making stuff less degenerate when it comes to this sort of sstuff is explained here :

 
Last edited:
Shut the fuck up and stop hiding behind your shit command of the English language

It is bloody irrelevant you mediocre pesantant. Social. Media is ran by a fucking algorithm. That means what people search h and click on will be what is trending. You rumb stupid cunt. Now fuck off.































This is a matter of social media.
Social media is a fucking algorithm.

Get that through to you thick skull you fucking stupid European dummbass

Everything mainstream is controlled by social media. Celebrities and music and shit


Hip hop came onto the scene with asses taking precedent sure. There was no social media so the producer could play on what they thought the consumer would like. Consumer being listener and viewer. The problem with making stuff less degenerate when it comes to this sort of sstuff is explained here :


relying on derogatory terms to get your point across , is that from ghetto music too ?:lul:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: The Moggee, MedMaxxing and john2
I liked this post tbh especially the part where op talks about conventionally white people
 
Yeah, now celibacy is joked upon by normies. The main problem is the sexual revolution that started in the early 1900s and became stronger in presence after the two World Wars. It's rooted in feminism and correlated with freedom. It promoted the ideology of nudity/semi-nudity for sex appeal in public. It went gainst the common biblical norm of modesty within the Victorian society. Idk whether it's the Jews or Elites/freemasons or whoever. But whoever they are they've screwed up society very well. Sex is talked about and stressed upon even IRL to death, unnecessarily. If you haven't lost your virginity from a young age, you're a loser jfl. I'm not trying to say that sexual attraction is natural and not some indoctrination... but it's being pushed too much, everything revolves around sex now. Every single conversation by males with a female is for the main intention of sex. You genuinely can't be friends with a female anymore. A white girl showing her ass on tiktok will always get more attention, and it's because she's trying to abuse a man's drive and get him to do even the most degenerate stuff to receive validation from her. Men were made that way to have high T (to be the gender with a high drive), but it's women who misuse it and make us dance like puppies. This is why asexual men who can't be controlled by women are the most superior beings. A modern female already has the power to live independently, mainly due to the fact women are allowed to work and earn. So she would rather select sexual attractiveness over money while pursuing a guy. This is one of the things which stem out of feminism too. Let's not talk about porn and e-whoring.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Matheus
It is actually very easy to understand what is going on, men are around 9 times hornier than women, companies and women use our sex drive against us to get money from us. Men get into relationships and get married because they want to get laid more easily, people don't do this for some hollywood version of love, they do it because they are horny. The men who think with their dick too much often end up making the worst decisions.

The solution is simple: Improve yourself but don't become a simp, don't give money to women and don't pay to satisfy your needs. And on top of all of that, always remember that every time you get laid, you exchanged something for it, it can be money or time. This is why I will never enter a relationship, because my time and money are very precious to me.


Also, it is normal that men and women are attracted to beauty, biological instincts are still impossible to resist because we cannot have sex with those that we're not attracted to, but at the same time, without those biological instincts, women would be unappealing and we wouldn't spend so much time and/or money on them, our sex drive is the main reason why we spend so much on them, and it was given to us by nature because otherwise, we wouldn't like to be around women, most of the time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxxedfalloutdweller
All passions and vices are emphasized in this society, because vices will make you a slave of your vices, and jews can provide you with the porn and degeneracy you crave, for just the right price.
 
  • +1
Reactions: warpsociety

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top