MAJOR WIN AGAINST LGBTQ

[JBcollector]

US Supreme Court rules in landmark LGBTQ case

The court ruled that a web designer cannot be forced to design sites celebrating gay marriage

www.rt.com

 

[Dr. Bludy]

Lgbtq is good for us

 

[latincell95]

Now we just need the Supreme Court to strike down no fault divorce law and rule that prostitution is legal in all 50 U.S. states

 

[JBcollector]

Lgbtq is good for us

Die did you even read the post faggot

 

[Dr. Bludy]

Die did you even read the post faggot

Smd

 

[Deleted member 5815]

The Supreme Court's decision to defend the right of a conservative designer to refuse creating websites for gay weddings is deeply troubling and regressive. By granting legal protection to discrimination based on sexual orientation, the court has undermined the principles of equality and inclusivity that should form the bedrock of any just society. This ruling not only perpetuates discrimination against the 2SLLGBTQIA+ community but also sets a dangerous precedent by prioritizing personal beliefs over the fundamental rights of individuals. It sends a distressing message that certain individuals can claim religious or ideological justifications to discriminate against marginalized groups, eroding progress towards a more equitable and tolerant society. This decision fails to recognize the importance of protecting the rights of all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation, and represents a setback in the ongoing fight for 2SLLGBTQIA+ rights and dignity.

 

[TheAnomaly]

Based Scotus.

 

[JBcollector]

The Supreme Court's decision to defend the right of a conservative designer to refuse creating websites for gay weddings is deeply troubling and regressive. By granting legal protection to discrimination based on sexual orientation, the court has undermined the principles of equality and inclusivity that should form the bedrock of any just society. This ruling not only perpetuates discrimination against the 2SLLGBTQIA+ community but also sets a dangerous precedent by prioritizing personal beliefs over the fundamental rights of individuals. It sends a distressing message that certain individuals can claim religious or ideological justifications to discriminate against marginalized groups, eroding progress towards a more equitable and tolerant society. This decision fails to recognize the importance of protecting the rights of all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation, and represents a setback in the ongoing fight for 2SLLGBTQIA+ rights and dignity.

 

[Eren]

towards 2SLLGBTQIA+ rights and dignity.

Is that the wifi password