Male Nature Megathread

I think it is a very good post btw i think male nature is much complex than female one since we have a clear dominance hierarchy among us when we compare to women. I think homosexuality and many other sexual fetishes can be rooted from the dominance hieararchy thing when you look at incels (bottom of hierarchy) they are generally very romantic, cuckold fetihists (jfl) or femdom fetishits that can tell you something about male nature tbh.
@thecel zero thoughts on that ? And i always wonders what do you mean when you woah react jfl ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
@thecel zero thoughts on that ? And i always wonders what do you mean when you woah react jfl ?

Whoa = 1) awesomely epic high-IQ, IQ-mogs me to obliv, or, 2) holy crap, I never thought about it like that, how come I never realized this obvious truth?, or, 3) this is shocking/astonishing
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Chintuck22 and Deleted member 12344
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
I thought you used this when you see a low iq post or a post you didnt like since you dont answer the threads that you woah react
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
>Psychology

:forcedsmile:
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
Psychology is horoscopes for 110 IQ people
I kinda agree tbh it is a meme science but he talks about evolutionary one not the normal psychology
 
Elab more
It’s a social science. It’s ‘laws’ and ‘postulations’ are descriptive not prescriptive. Humans are simply too complex to follow the nicely prepackaged and simplified psychological descriptions of their own behaviour. Sure it isnt completely useless but take all these experiments with a grain of salt as human behaviour cannot be tested or measured empirically.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 12344, thecel and volcelfatcel
It’s a social science. It’s ‘laws’ and ‘postulations’ are descriptive not prescriptive. Humans are simply too complex to follow the nicely prepackaged and simplified psychological descriptions of their own behaviour. Sure it isnt completely useless but take all these experiments with a grain of salt as human behaviour cannot be tested or measured empirically.
keep barking you lil douchebag, just mad that kerala mogs you
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Chadeep, AcneScars and thecel
Men have penises, testicles, and more testosterone than women.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
Men have penises, testicles, and more testosterone than women.

K.

How should women optimally try to get the best men? How should men try to get men?

What are the main reasons men dump their girlfriends? Hypergamy?

What can a hyprgamous, low-SMV person do to reduce the odds of his or her lucky Chad catch leaving him or her for a Chad or Stacy? Is it different for guys in relationships with guys and guys in relationships with girls?
 
Last edited:
K. How should women optimally go about getting the best men? How do men get men? What can a hyprgamous, low-SMV woman or man do to reduce the odds of her lucky Chad catch leaving her for a Stacy?
There's nothing they can really do but hope for the best. That's what happens when you push for sexual liberation and women's rights. They should have known they can't have it all.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: thecel
It’s a social science. It’s ‘laws’ and ‘postulations’ are descriptive not prescriptive. Humans are simply too complex to follow the nicely prepackaged and simplified psychological descriptions of their own behaviour. Sure it isnt completely useless but take all these experiments with a grain of salt as human behaviour cannot be tested or measured empirically.
Also they take normal brain as modern nt brain which wont exist in the past (actually where we evolved) psychology is a modern domestication method for the masses just like religions. For example people say you should okay with your wife sleeping with different persons before you but it is lierally SAME with the saing you should be okay with someone killing you jfl ofc you will feel insecure about this and if you dont feel insecure about this this means you just give up on life.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: AcneScars and thecel
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep, thecel, Deleted member 12344 and 1 other person
Also they take normal brain as modern nt brain which wont exist in the past (actually where we evolved) psychology is a modern domestication method for the masses just like religions. For example people say you should okay with your wife sleeping with different persons before you but it is lierally SAME with the saing you should be okay with someone killing you jfl ofc you will feel insecure about this and if you dont feel insecure about this this means you just give up on life.
Exactly. Normies love to read psychology because it’s easy af but still sounds kinda intellectual. Same with amateur philosophy, I’d like them to try and read Critique of Pure Reason:feelskek:

What they don’t realise is that because psychology lacks rigour unlike physics or maths, it’s results can be modified easily and (((they))) can publish whatever they want without receiving any criticism in peer-reviewed journals because the experiment conditions are considered to be ‘valid’ on paper.

The same doesn’t happen in the actual sciences because 1+1 is 2 no matter what parameters you specify
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Deleted member 12344
There are plenty of lightskin curly hair psychologists in Kerala you lil douchebag
only at the wedding you lil douchebag, couldn't even do the sermon properly since you don't have a deep voice :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel and AcneScars
only at the wedding you lil douchebag, couldn't even do the sermon properly since you don't have a deep voice :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Go back to Punjab you low IQ North Indian. Y’all mfs low IQ and THATS A FACT💪🌴
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel and volcelfatcel
Go back to Punjab you low IQ North Indian. Y’all mfs low IQ and THATS A FACT💪🌴
Not even from Punjab but ok you lil douchebag, you wish you were me
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AcneScars
Exactly. Normies love to read psychology because it’s easy af but still sounds kinda intellectual. Same with amateur philosophy, I’d like them to try and read Critique of Pure Reason:feelskek:

What they don’t realise is that because psychology lacks rigour unlike physics or maths, it’s results can be modified easily and (((they))) can publish whatever they want without receiving any criticism in peer-reviewed journals because the experiment conditions are considered to be ‘valid’ on paper.

The same doesn’t happen in the actual sciences because 1+1 is 2 no matter what parameters you specify
Agreed. Social "sciences" are ALL meme i am thinking even philosphy become a meme since humans figured out most of the things todays cuck philosophers only cope is "muh you cant be sure about everything" "muh do we truly exist" i am pretty these two RETARDED questions would be answered in future by chad scientists too in fact all of the thinking would go for nothing just like what happened to other philosophers.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AcneScars
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, Chadeep and volcelfatcel

Similar threads

renos
Replies
12
Views
292
renos
renos
Changmentum
Replies
13
Views
490
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
Informationcapitali
Mogs Good music
Replies
1
Views
98
Informationcapitali
Informationcapitali

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top