Male Variability Theory and the Hierarchy of Power

[Prøphet]

Male variability theory holds that males are over represented as outliers in several aspect of life, be it IQ, socioeconomic status, etc

Basically women are more likely to be average, while men are more likely to be exceptional (either positively or negatively)

I think this relates to the hierarchy in our current society

At the top you have the top percentile men, in the middle you have women as a whole, and at the bottom you have the mid-low percentile men

I used to believe women were at the top because of their SMV, but the truth is that the archetypal “Chad” will always have the potential for a better life than the “Stacy”

Men at the top of the top become godlike figures rich in an indescribable essence, driving a feverish craze out of the world, in a way a top percentile woman never could

This also ties into traditional Redpill theory about the very nature of masculinity and femininity, where the former seeks to grow while the latter seeks to preserve.

So feminists want to be equal not to the average man, but to the man at the top, whether in looks, money, or status. The life of even a mediocre man would be inferior to theirs.

This also speaks to why “autistic” (neuro-DIVERGENT) behavior is hypermasculine in nature. Because it’s so extreme, “spiky”, and variable. True autistic behavior is nearly unheard of in women because of their propensity toward the average and roundly mediocre. They are designed to be neuro-CONVERGENT

Thoughts?

 

[Aox Ofwar]

but the truth is Chad will always have the potential for a better life than Stacy

No

 

[Prøphet]

No

A top percentile woman is limited by a bottleneck designed by biology itself, imo. They don’t possess the traits or abilities that men do to perceive, express and characterize exceptionality.

 

[Prøphet]

Also this structure has held true through most of history

 

[Aox Ofwar]

A top percentile woman is limited by a bottleneck designed by biology itself, imo. They don’t possess the traits or abilities that men do to perceive, express and characterize exceptionality.

You don't really need to be exceptional at everything to be happy. What you said is true, but at the same time society doesn't expect as much from women. Stacy can just whore around and live a happy life leeching off of sugar daddies, unemployed women aren't even as looked down upon as men

 

[Prøphet]

You don't really need to be exceptional at everything to be happy. What you said is true, but at the same time society doesn't expect as much from women. Stacy can just whore around and live a happy life leeching off of sugar daddies, unemployed women aren't even as looked down upon as men

She may be happier, but happiness isn’t all we desire in my opinion. We desire meaning, and a man is better equipped to find it, from his neurochemistry to his physical form. A powerful man has a better capacity to be truly fulfilled, through his utter independence. The weak man suffers the most because he can find neither pleasure or meaning, while the strong men has a much easier time finding both. The woman only finds half of the equation, even if she’s virtually guaranteed it. Such is the mediocre and ordinary nature of her.

 

[davidlaidisme67]

Male variability theory holds that males are over represented as outliers in several aspect of life, be it IQ, socioeconomic status, etc

Basically women are more likely to be average, while men are more likely to be exceptional (either positively or negatively)

View attachment 4804697

I think this relates to the hierarchy in our current society

At the top you have the top percentile men, in the middle you have women as a whole, and at the bottom you have the mid-low percentile men

I used to believe women were at the top because of their SMV, but the truth is Chad will always have the potential for a better life than Stacy

Men at the top become godlike and drive a feverish craze out of the world, in a way a top percentile woman never could

This also ties into traditional Redpill theory about the very nature of masculinity and femininity, where the former seeks to grow while the latter seeks to preserve.

So feminists want to be equal not to the average man, but to the man at the top, whether in looks, money, or status. The life of even a mediocre man would be inferior to theirs.

This also says a lot about why “autistic” behavior is hypermasculine in nature. Because it’s so extreme, “spiky”, and variable. True autistic behavior is nearly unheard of in women because of their propensity toward the average and roundly mediocre.

Thoughts?

Absolutely right and also the variability amongst men in terms of iq legit makes me think we’re the only sentient beings as women mainly fall in median. They all think the same, have the same iq and have the same type aka chad

 

[Prøphet]

Absolutely right and also the variability amongst men in terms of iq legit makes me think we’re the only sentient beings as women mainly fall in median. They all think the same, have the same iq and have the same type aka chad

Exactly, their behavior comes off to us as so hiveminded and predictable because of how “neuroconvergent” they are socially. They have even modeled our very society to hold the same convergent pressures, thus driving an even greater pressure against divergent men who fail to become powerful.

 

[davidlaidisme67]

Exactly, their behavior comes off to us as so hiveminded and predictable because of how “neuroconvergent” they are socially. They have even modeled our very society to hold the same convergent pressures, thus driving an even greater pressure against divergent men who fail to become powerful.

So true. One guy I know irl theorized this is due to the 2 XX chromosomes they inherit equalize everything making them average at birth and hive minded. Meanwhile with men, Y chromosomes are much more varied in terms of genes and genetic recombination also our T makes us more logical

 

[Aox Ofwar]

She may be happier, but happiness isn’t all we desire in my opinion. We desire meaning, and a man is better equipped to find it,

It's different from person to person, not everyone seeks meaning in life, you can't speak for everybody. Think of your average jock, I don't think he really cares about bringing any value in life, and there's nothing wrong about it because life doesn't have any meaning in general, the only thing keeping us alive is the feeling of pleasure and happiness that our existence brings us, whether you'd rather follow some big goal in life or go clubbing and partying on weekends it all means the same essentially, the only difference is one is short term and the other is long term. Besides women can exceed in science literature etc they're only hard capped physically

 

[soulless_npc]

Women follow, men would rather lead than follow. But you have to kiss ass and suck dick to be on top. So a lot of men don't do this and since the middle class has been eradicated these men are now the ones on the bottom. If you're not tapped in, you are an outcast from society. Men who end up lone wolves just refuse to be led by other men, but you pay the price for this by being ejected from the circuit altogether.

 

[Nectar]

Dnrd but bookmarked so I can read later

 

[mcmentalonthemic]

Chad has monopoly over sexual/dating market, this has been known since late 2000's bodybuilding forums

 

[Andremln]

The winner takes it all

Yes, "Chad" has it easier in life than even the prettiest women there are, strictly because the level of desire they produce in women is infinitely more powerful than what "Stacy" produces on men, not only men might sacrifice PSL in a woman for another one with a better body, but attraction in women is much more exponential and abrupt in change relative to basal level, this being reserved for the top notch tier men

 

[Prøphet]

It's different from person to person, not everyone seeks meaning in life, you can't speak for everybody. Think of your average jock, I don't think he really cares about bringing any value in life, and there's nothing wrong about it because life doesn't have any meaning in general, the only thing keeping us alive is the feeling of pleasure and happiness that our existence brings us, whether you'd rather follow some big goal in life or go clubbing and partying on weekends it all means the same essentially, the only difference is one is short term and the other is long term. Besides women can exceed in science literature etc they're only hard capped physically

I still think the majority of people would refuse if you were to offer them a button that would put them into an irreversibly eternal state of happiness. As agents of life itself we need a justification in some form, whether we’re aware of this unconscious drive or not

 

[Prøphet]

Women follow, men would rather lead than follow. But you have to kiss ass and suck dick to be on top. So a lot of men don't do this and since the middle class has been eradicated these men are now the ones on the bottom. If you're not tapped in, you are an outcast from society. Men who end up lone wolves just refuse to be led by other men, but you pay the price for this by being ejected from the circuit altogether.

There truth to this but you dont always have to kiss ass if you find a way above the system instead of within it. Easier said than done of course but some divergent men found ways like that (inventors, revolutionaries, artists, etc)

 

[Prøphet]

The winner takes it all

Yes, "Chad" has it easier in life than even the prettiest women there are, strictly because the level of desire they produce in women is infinitely more powerful than what "Stacy" produces on men, not only men might sacrifice PSL in a woman for another one with a better body, but attraction in women is much more exponential and abrupt in change relative to basal level, this being reserved for the top notch tier men

Well said

 

[oatmeal]

still remember when someone told me the most apollonian thing you could do is trooning. some people are retarded.

unrelated to your thread but yeah.

 

[Prøphet]

still remember when someone told me the most apollonian thing you could do is trooning. some people are retarded.

unrelated to your thread but yeah.

Nietzsche spoke of this

 

[Grievous]

Totally agree with this

I think it ties into why so many women are boring and its harder to find a women with interesting/niche hobbies compared to men