Bluepill Male virginity isnt as high as you might think.

Finn

Finn

Gold
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Posts
810
Reputation
632
Bild 2026 02 22 185516500

source: https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/new-sex-data-has-arrived

NSFG 2022–23 Key Findings (US adults 15–49, n≈10,000).

Core Results​

  • Multimode survey (online/FTF) post-COVID.
  • 18–29 men sexless (no opp-sex partners/yr): 23.4% → 31.5%; women 22.4% → 23.6% (not sig.).
  • Virginity 18–29: men 19.5%, women 18.4% (up from ~15%).
  • 18–24 men: sexless 32% → 40%; women stable ~29%.
  • 25–34: both up ~6% (men 18%, women 17%).
  • No "Chadopoly"—partner distributions balanced.
  • ~5% heteros had sex with internet-met partners (no gender gap).
  • Online mode inflates sexlessness/virginity vs. FTF (bias/fraud).
  • Declining response rates; weighted, but trends cautious.
  • Cohort anomalies: younger same-birth groups "virginer" (artifact?).
  • Potential Lie: Respondents might lie due to shame/social desirability bias
 
The Fool

The Fool

Permajut
Joined
Oct 20, 2025
Posts
2,501
Reputation
2,984
View attachment 4687165
source: https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/new-sex-data-has-arrived

NSFG 2022–23 Key Findings (US adults 15–49, n≈10,000).

Core Results​

  • Multimode survey (online/FTF) post-COVID.
  • 18–29 men sexless (no opp-sex partners/yr): 23.4% → 31.5%; women 22.4% → 23.6% (not sig.).
  • Virginity 18–29: men 19.5%, women 18.4% (up from ~15%).
  • 18–24 men: sexless 32% → 40%; women stable ~29%.
  • 25–34: both up ~6% (men 18%, women 17%).
  • No "Chadopoly"—partner distributions balanced.
  • ~5% heteros had sex with internet-met partners (no gender gap).
  • Online mode inflates sexlessness/virginity vs. FTF (bias/fraud).
  • Declining response rates; weighted, but trends cautious.
  • Cohort anomalies: younger same-birth groups "virginer" (artifact?).
  • Potential Lie: Respondents might lie due to shame/social desirability bias
Holy shit
 
The Fool

The Fool

Permajut
Joined
Oct 20, 2025
Posts
2,501
Reputation
2,984
I don’t even know who to tag for this
 
The Fool

The Fool

Permajut
Joined
Oct 20, 2025
Posts
2,501
Reputation
2,984
what do you think? do you think this is bs or is it "new" for you?
This would alter my entire world view if it was true
 
Finn

Finn

Gold
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Posts
810
Reputation
632
This would alter my entire world view if it was true
im not saying this is true. just click the link and read the whole thing and the core results especially the last bullet point i made
 
The Fool

The Fool

Permajut
Joined
Oct 20, 2025
Posts
2,501
Reputation
2,984
I mean many men lie about their virginity :lul:
But the number of 10’000 is significant because it balances out with the same number of lies and outliers
 
kwjqxlw99

kwjqxlw99

Gold
Joined
Feb 28, 2025
Posts
996
Reputation
1,104
You are an absolute retard if you believe those numbers to be real

Most guys are embrassed to admit they are virgins and inflate their numbers and for women it is the opposite so completely useless study
 
Finn

Finn

Gold
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Posts
810
Reputation
632
You are an absolute retard if you believe those numbers to be real

Most guys are embrassed to admit they are virgins and inflate their numbers and for women it is the opposite so completely useless study
thats the thing we wont know. but the sample size is 10.000, this isnt low.
 
negativ_canthalshit

negativ_canthalshit

Life is getting better
Joined
Nov 18, 2025
Posts
5,150
Reputation
6,458
View attachment 4687165
source: https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/new-sex-data-has-arrived

NSFG 2022–23 Key Findings (US adults 15–49, n≈10,000).

Core Results​

  • Multimode survey (online/FTF) post-COVID.
  • 18–29 men sexless (no opp-sex partners/yr): 23.4% → 31.5%; women 22.4% → 23.6% (not sig.).
  • Virginity 18–29: men 19.5%, women 18.4% (up from ~15%).
  • 18–24 men: sexless 32% → 40%; women stable ~29%.
  • 25–34: both up ~6% (men 18%, women 17%).
  • No "Chadopoly"—partner distributions balanced.
  • ~5% heteros had sex with internet-met partners (no gender gap).
  • Online mode inflates sexlessness/virginity vs. FTF (bias/fraud).
  • Declining response rates; weighted, but trends cautious.
  • Cohort anomalies: younger same-birth groups "virginer" (artifact?).
  • Potential Lie: Respondents might lie due to shame/social desirability bias
I'm not a virgin but I still lie about my body count...
 
kwjqxlw99

kwjqxlw99

Gold
Joined
Feb 28, 2025
Posts
996
Reputation
1,104
thats the thing we wont know. but the sample size is 10.000, this isnt low.
It doesn't change anything just means more people are lying that's all
 
shandingo

shandingo

Platinum
Joined
Sep 5, 2025
Posts
1,059
Reputation
1,339
"During the first four weeks of each quarters, data was collected through web surveys" seems accurate
 
Wicket

Wicket

Stonecold KHHV truecel
Joined
Dec 8, 2024
Posts
4,196
Reputation
7,054
Should be higher :feelsokman:
 
Ahmed88

Ahmed88

16yo 6'5
Joined
Nov 2, 2025
Posts
2,216
Reputation
2,997
But the number of 10’000 is significant because it balances out with the same number of lies and outliers
Doesn't really balance it out ngl the percentage of people that lie will always stay the same
 
SharpOrange

SharpOrange

lifelong KHHV oldcel
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Posts
2,638
Reputation
5,350
View attachment 4687165
source: https://nuancepill.substack.com/p/new-sex-data-has-arrived

NSFG 2022–23 Key Findings (US adults 15–49, n≈10,000).

Core Results​

  • Multimode survey (online/FTF) post-COVID.
  • 18–29 men sexless (no opp-sex partners/yr): 23.4% → 31.5%; women 22.4% → 23.6% (not sig.).
  • Virginity 18–29: men 19.5%, women 18.4% (up from ~15%).
  • 18–24 men: sexless 32% → 40%; women stable ~29%.
  • 25–34: both up ~6% (men 18%, women 17%).
  • No "Chadopoly"—partner distributions balanced.
  • ~5% heteros had sex with internet-met partners (no gender gap).
  • Online mode inflates sexlessness/virginity vs. FTF (bias/fraud).
  • Declining response rates; weighted, but trends cautious.
  • Cohort anomalies: younger same-birth groups "virginer" (artifact?).
  • Potential Lie: Respondents might lie due to shame/social desirability bias
dnr people are lying about pussy
 
Wexilarious

Wexilarious

Life is Roblox
Joined
Nov 11, 2024
Posts
5,572
Reputation
5,715
33% of men and women will be virgins, they like to watch mgtow and same shit for women videos so they can hate chads and slutty girls
 
GynoGladiator

GynoGladiator

Luminary
Joined
Sep 4, 2024
Posts
6,026
Reputation
10,363
Potential Lie: Respondents might lie due to shame/social desirability bias
This should be put on the top

Since it’s generally said that men with higher body counts gain “value” just like women with lower body count

I would say it’s still not as bad as people think but it’s slightly skewed
 
Finn

Finn

Gold
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Posts
810
Reputation
632
This should be put on the top

Since it’s generally said that men with higher body counts gain “value” just like women with lower body count

I would say it’s still not as bad as people think but it’s slightly skewed
this Potential Lie thing wasnt in the study, i added it. because this is legit criticism
 

Similar threads

NordicLeonhard
Replies
7
Views
103
estrogen consumer
estrogen consumer
WannabeClavicular
Replies
14
Views
61
cytoplasm
cytoplasm
saumya_19
Replies
4
Views
44
shandingo
shandingo
Societal Reject
Replies
2
Views
42
eyecelforlife
E
teddy101
Replies
5
Views
49
teddy101
teddy101

Users who are viewing this thread

Top