Many PSLers rate faces based on analysis first instead of just using their natural intuition

[Deleted member 5892]

I've seen many raters who would compare Eriksen to the guy on the right by saying :
- Eriksen has a lower PFL, less UEE, straighter supraorbitals, blah blah therefore Eriksen is better looking than the guy on the right
And it's a flawed way of assessing attractiveness, since you are supposed to recognize a good looking face without consciously analyzing it (at first. Analysis is supposed to come after in order to understand what makes someone (un)attractive).

When I look at Eriksen, I see someone with extremely uncanny eyes. When I look at the guy on the right, I see a beautiful face. That's it.
Now, after this, I can start analyzing and try to understand why I find Eriksen uncanny looking.
After all, looks theory comes from observation. It comes from our ability to intuitively determine whether someone is attractive or not, in a matter of milliseconds. And looks theory is just a method for analysis, which is supposed to help us understand why we find some faces better looking than others.

And of course, there comes the useless ''mog battles'' where users compare their features to determine which one mogs (hairline mog battle ??)...dude all you have to do is fucking LOOK at their faces and see who you find better looking ...it takes a fucking nanosecond

It's supposed to be common sense really

 

[Deleted member 18840]

Guy on left is more aesthetic less appealing right is more common, more appealing. But bad pic for erisken in this he looks insane in many others he looks meh. Its impossible to compare selfies with pro edited frauded model pics

 

[incel194012940]

Left is an ethnic with those angry Indian eyes average looking
Right is good looking

 

[Deleted member 5892]

Guy on left is more aesthetic less appealing right is more common, more appealing. But bad pic for erisken in this he looks insane in many others he looks meh. Its impossible to compare selfies with pro edited frauded model pics

I never found eriksen aesthetic. He's obviously statistically above average, but I can guarantee that almost any woman would prefer the guy on the right

 

[Deleted member 14160]

Eriksen mogs that other guy to suicide psl and appeal. That guy unfrauded looks giga ass fucktard

Edit: actually this guy is giga lighting frauding and he still looks ass as fuck. The pic in op is faceapped I forgot the oh thread where he was posted. I wanna beat the living shit outta this fuckin faggot irl

 

[Deleted member 14160]

Eriksen mogs that other guy to suicide psl and appeal. That guy unfrauded looks giga ass fucktard
View attachment 1782902
Edit: actually this guy is giga lighting frauding and he still looks ass as fuck. I wanna beat the living shit outta this fuckin faggot irl

@StrangerDanger

 

[Deleted member 18840]

Eriksen mogs that other guy to suicide psl and appeal. That guy unfrauded looks giga ass fucktard
View attachment 1782902
Edit: actually this guy is giga lighting frauding and he still looks ass as fuck. I wanna beat the living shit outta this fuckin faggot irl

Im tired of ppl editing their pics its obv edited

 

[StrangerDanger]

@StrangerDanger

Eriksen mogs this cuck

 

[Deleted member 5892]

Eriksen mogs that other guy to suicide psl and appeal. That guy unfrauded looks giga ass fucktard
View attachment 1782902
Edit: actually this guy is giga lighting frauding and he still looks ass as fuck. The pic in op is faceapp Ed I forgot the oh thread where he was posted. I wanna beat the living shit outta this fuckin faggot irl

I agree that he looks worse in that pic
I just took this guy as a random example really, I couldve tried to find a better model.
But my point stands regarding the pictures used in my OP

 

[Manu le coq]

 

[Deleted member 18840]

I agree that he looks worse in that pic
I just took this guy as a random example really, I couldve tried to find a better model.
But my point stands regarding the pictures used in my OP

I’m starting to get angry at psl aspies who compare and judge selfies vs frauded edited pro pics in best angle and lightning. People obviously irl look closer to the later. We are too harsh on ourselves. I can guarantee you 99,99/100 of models even super models irl wouldn’t be insane looking by psl standards unfrauded.
I never seen a real chad irl per psl beside 1 guy. And i have seen more than 1 million ppl easily. Even chadlites are super rare and it made me feel insecure about myself, while when i take decent pics i’m pretty close to those guys who fraud 100x more. Thats also why girls standards are lower. We are too aspie

 

[Deleted member 5892]

I’m starting to get angry at psl aspies who compare and judge selfies vs frauded edited pro pics in best angle and lightning. People obviously irl look closer to the later. We are too harsh on ourselves. I can guarantee you 99,99/100 of models even super models irl wouldn’t be insane looking by psl standards unfrauded.
I never seen a real chad irl per psl beside 1 guy. And i have seen more than 1 million ppl easily. Even chadlites are super rare and it made me feel insecure about myself, while when i take decent pics i’m pretty close to those guys who fraud 100x more. Thats also why girls standards are lower. We are too aspie

looksmaxers should look at themselves in motion using natural light

 

[Deleted member 18840]

looksmaxers should look at themselves in motion using natural light

Taken by others ideally, rather than themselves, and in candids. Cuz thats the closest of how you look irl

 

[Deleted member 5892]

Taken by others ideally, rather than themselves, and in candids. Cuz thats the closest of how you look irl

yea true
I personally use 3d photogrammetry and have done complete scans of my skull and thats literally the best thing u can do if you want to see yourself in VR

 

[wollet2]

Left is an ethnic with those angry Indian eyes average looking
Right is good looking

how is he ethnic, subhuman? but right looks more harmonious in this comparison

 

[HerpDerpson]

I'm a newbie, I can't recognize Eriksen immediately. I took one glance at them and the left guy looked better to me.

 

[Deleted member 4106]

But the perception of beauty of men and women are different.
Aside from the difference between aesthetics and sex appeal, Erikson looks more dymorphic, the guy on the right looks like a fag.Certainly many women would prefer Erikson for being more masculine.

 

[Deleted member 5892]

I'm a newbie, I can't recognize Eriksen immediately. I took one glance at them and the left guy looked better to me.

Once the looks threshold is met (both guys are statistically above average), tastes differ. My assumption is that most women would prefer the guy on the right, but the guy on the left still appeals to some women.
The point of this thread wasn't to talk about eriksen specifically. Point is that ive seen users who analyze 1st instead of using their natural ability

 

[Deleted member 5892]

But the perception of beauty of men and women are different.
Aside from the difference between aesthetics and sex appeal, Erikson looks more dymorphic, the guy on the right looks like a fag.Certainly many women would prefer Erikson for being more masculine.

If i had to guess, id say that a more masculine guy like Eriksen would do better for short term mating. But pure aesthetics are more important in every day life. Women also on average, prefer darker features so there's that
I could've used Tyson Ballou instead of the guy on the right, who combines high aesthetics and dimorphism
At this point, it's a matter of taste, they will appeal to different niches
But my point was that u gotta use your natural instinct, not analyze 1st

Also, let me add that even tho Eriksen looks more masc, he looks more uncanny, and it turns people off. Just like Kim Kardashian probably looks uncanny to you, with all the surgeries she had done.

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Facts tbh. I agree completely