Masculinity is social cancer that destroys civilisations

disillusioned

disillusioned

Fuchsia
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
11,881
Reputation
35,788
Just look at the most advanced races/civilizations and how 'masculine' they are...

EDIT: The least masculine civilizations are at the top of the list.

Asians: Have the most civic-minded and collectivist civilizations. Already achieved advanced societies thousands of years before everyone else. Complex social code. Highest IQ on average. Crime is very low. Masculinity is discouraged for the sake of social harmony. Have smaller bodies and height on average.

Whites: Moderately civic-minded but also considerably more individualistic compared to Asians. Achieved advanced civilization but not as early as Asians. Reasonably high IQ on average. Low to moderate crime. Masculinity is moderately encouraged insofar as it doesn't come at the expense of order. Have average height and builds ignoring certain exceptions (nordic countries).

Blacks/Browns: Not civic-minded at all. Never achieved any noteworthy civilization. Low IQ on average. Moderate to high crime. Hyper-masculine culture. More testosterone and stronger physical builds on average.

Notice how the things that are the most advantageous for the purpose of advancing/maintaining society are also the exact things that women DON'T WANT in men. To support female liberty is to basically support barbarism. Ricecels have the most elaborate social orders yet foids of all races fucking despise them. The violent and low IQ demographics meanwhile turn into superstars for their unintelligible barbarism.

Evolution selects FOR societies that are LESS masculine because otherwise, foids will just breed with the barbarians until the average IQ has sunk into the low double digits.

This is frankly fucking hilarious. Cuck white knights think not giving women rights is uncivilized, yet by giving them said rights they basically doom their own culture to barbarism long-term. :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 27729, Deleted member 1698, incel194012940 and 12 others
@8PSLcel
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: ifyouwannabemylover and Deleted member 17791
What is ur definition of masculine
 
Asians are very low t and feminine not only in the way that they look. Got a ton of tranny's over there. And they're the most obedient race by a mile. I wouldn't call that masculine
 
Being civilized isn't masculine.

Being civilized means you're a slave who follows man-made rules and beliefs that were created by your slave rulers to control you and keep you as their slaves.
 
Nigga just because u think east asians look gay doesn't mean they don't behave like men. Do u want to see how hoes get beat the fuck out by their husband's in China?

East asian culture is all about protecting your family. That's pretty masculine. Your judging masculinity very superficially
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: anthony111553, Deleted member 3828, incel194012940 and 5 others
Asians are very low t and feminine not only in the way that they look. Got a ton of tranny's over there. And they're the most obedient race by a mile. I wouldn't call that masculine
Obedient? The deadliest rebellions in human history all happened in China.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksOrDeath, MakinMogReturns and Yliaster
Being civilized isn't masculine.

Being civilized means you're a slave who follows man-made rules and beliefs that were created by your slave rulers to control you and keep you as their slaves.
Being a low inhib retard doesn't make u masculine. Eurasia throughout its whole history has similar levels of civilization to each other. Just because your working within the frameworks of a society doesn't make u less masculine lmao.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ManletBlackcel, LooksOrDeath, Deleted member 1507 and 4 others
Maybe civilization is the cancer
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: to be human, Dog, MakinMogReturns and 2 others
Asians are very low t and feminine not only in the way that they look. Got a ton of tranny's over there. And they're the most obedient race by a mile. I wouldn't call that masculine
You read the thread wrong. Asians have the lowest masculinity.

Nigga just because u think east asians look gay doesn't mean they don't behave like men. Do u want to see how hoes get beat the fuck out by their husband's in China?

East asian culture is all about protecting your family. That's pretty masculine. Your judging masculinity very superficially
Depends on which part of China. China is so massive it's not really a single ethnic group. The darker portions in the south are more masculine, probably. Ditto for South-Asians in general.
Obedient? The deadliest rebellions in human history all happened in China.
These weren't started by the commoner. The average Chinese was just a drone dragged into the wars.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 19066 and Trilogy
Are you a ricecel?
 
Being a low inhib retard doesn't make u masculine. Eurasia throughout its whole history has similar levels of civilization to each other. Just because your working within the frameworks of a society doesn't make u less masculine lmao.
masculinity is inherently destructive
 
  • +1
Reactions: fukmylyf and Yliaster
Do you realize western men used to be masculine just 50 years ago ?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 1507, Yliaster and Deleted member 17791
The darker portions in the south are more masculine, probably. Ditto for South-Asians in general.
LOL, what? Northern Chinese are much taller and more admixed with the Central Asian warriors that invaded and raped China.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Cheesyrumble
legit theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1507 and nav_w1
Do you realize western men used to be masculine just 50 years ago ?
Jfl if anything they were even more cucked than currently due to their conservative 'chivalry' bullshit.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 7580
masculinity is gay tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Trilogy
On point.

Asia has the most rigid social systems which allowed the genetic garbage to reproduce as long as they're obedient and act civilised. Asian men have the most paternal ancestors of any race. Because so many asian men reproduced , they're the lowest T, most unattractive and least dimorphic of all races.

Where there are less social structures, more competition and chaos - the masculine and dominant men rise to the top, less people reproduce and the population end up the most dimorphic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dog and thereallegend
the world would unironically be a better place if 99% of men were genocided. Most problems are caused by competition for pussy or resources that lead to pussy
 
Women are literal goddesses and it’s job of everyone to bow down to them
 
  • +1
Reactions: AlexanderTheGreat11, fukmylyf and ifyouwannabemylover
the world would unironically be a better place if 99% of men were genocided. Most problems are caused by competition for pussy or resources that lead to pussy
Would it matter? Why did rich feudal lords go to war when they had plenty of resources anyways?

Human thirst for power is infinite.
 
Being a low inhib retard doesn't make u masculine. Eurasia throughout its whole history has similar levels of civilization to each other. Just because your working within the frameworks of a society doesn't make u less masculine lmao.
Society is synonymous with slavery. Being a good slave and fitting in with the slaves makes you a loser
 
  • +1
Reactions: ManletBlackcel and Dog
Obedient? The deadliest rebellions in human history all happened in China.
Slaves rebelling for their slave masters for slightly better slavery conditions
 
Being a violent low IQ barbarian =/= being masculine
 
  • +1
Reactions: Papal_Guard and Cheesyrumble
Just look at the most advanced races/civilizations and how 'masculine' they are...

EDIT: The least masculine civilizations are at the top of the list.

Asians: Have the most civic-minded and collectivist civilizations. Already achieved advanced societies thousands of years before everyone else. Complex social code. Highest IQ on average. Crime is very low. Masculinity is discouraged for the sake of social harmony. Have smaller bodies and height on average.

Whites: Moderately civic-minded but also considerably more individualistic compared to Asians. Achieved advanced civilization but not as early as Asians. Reasonably high IQ on average. Low to moderate crime. Masculinity is moderately encouraged insofar as it doesn't come at the expense of order. Have average height and builds ignoring certain exceptions (nordic countries).

Blacks/Browns: Not civic-minded at all. Never achieved any noteworthy civilization. Low IQ on average. Moderate to high crime. Hyper-masculine culture. More testosterone and stronger physical builds on average.

Notice how the things that are the most advantageous for the purpose of advancing/maintaining society are also the exact things that women DON'T WANT in men. To support female liberty is to basically support barbarism. Ricecels have the most elaborate social orders yet foids of all races fucking despise them. The violent and low IQ demographics meanwhile turn into superstars for their unintelligible barbarism.

Evolution selects FOR societies that are LESS masculine because otherwise, foids will just breed with the barbarians until the average IQ has sunk into the low double digits.

This is frankly fucking hilarious. Cuck white knights think not giving women rights is uncivilized, yet by giving them said rights they basically doom their own culture to barbarism long-term. :feelskek:
Civilization is really cringe
On point.

Asia has the most rigid social systems which allowed the genetic garbage to reproduce as long as they're obedient and act civilised. Asian men have the most paternal ancestors of any race. Because so many asian men reproduced , they're the lowest T, most unattractive and least dimorphic of all races.

Where there are less social structures, more competition and chaos - the masculine and dominant men rise to the top, less people reproduce and the population end up the most dimorphic.
🤯
Bring back natural selection
 
Would it matter? Why did rich feudal lords go to war when they had plenty of resources anyways?

Human thirst for power is infinite.
1667951624183
 
@fukmylyf where are you
 

Similar threads

anthony111553
Replies
1
Views
28
HardStuckLTN;
HardStuckLTN;
anondude
Replies
0
Views
22
anondude
anondude
AS12
Replies
8
Views
28
PassionateNT
PassionateNT
AgentAngularity
Replies
25
Views
137
eryy21
eryy21
peterk1287
Replies
16
Views
103
RichardSpencel
RichardSpencel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top