math vs english

Incel losers sit at home jerking off to calculus while Chad fucks art school bitches while reciting lord Byron poems
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamefranklin
uh no? your point is that slow players dont make blah blah thats why it fits, but they do make it? thats why the analogy doesnt fit?
A 'slow' basketball player survives because they have other skillsto compensate. In a math exam, you have one skill, pure logical processing. If you're 'slow' at that, you don't get moved to 'pf'' you just fail the class.
English is the subject that works with basketball analogy. If you’re bad at logic, you can compensate with a good vocabulary or a creative 'interpretation.' You can be a 'slow' thinker and still 'thrive' because English is a team sport between you and the marker's vibes.
 
You're lying to yourself:lul:. Math is the ultimate cognitive stress test. If it were just about 'learning the rules,' then everyone who put in the hours would be a physicist. But they aren't. They hit a ceiling where their brain literally cannot process the abstraction anymore.

English is the 'skill' you learn Math is the engine you're born with. You can't 'teach' someone to visualize a 4D manifold any more than you can teach a blind person to see color. You either have the hardware run the program, or you don't.

That’s why English is for the masses and High-Level Math is for the elite. In English, you’re just rearranging words everyone already knows. In Math, you’re trying to decode the language of the universe with a brain that’s clearly struggling to handle basic logic. Calling it a 'learnable skill' is just your way of pretending you aren't scared of the IQ wall you’re about to hit.
math isn't a skill your born with its a skill that you build on with smaller ones such as pattern recognition logic and practice people normally hit ceilings because of missing skills and foundations not because they are incapable
 
A 'slow' basketball player survives because they have other skillsto compensate. In a math exam, you have one skill, pure logical processing. If you're 'slow' at that, you don't get moved to 'pf'' you just fail the class.
English is the subject that works with basketball analogy. If you’re bad at logic, you can compensate with a good vocabulary or a creative 'interpretation.' You can be a 'slow' thinker and still 'thrive' because English is a team sport between you and the marker's vibes.
wait i have to go brb, chit chat later?
 
  • +1
Reactions: User772772
A 'slow' basketball player survives because they have other skillsto compensate. In a math exam, you have one skill, pure logical processing. If you're 'slow' at that, you don't get moved to 'pf'' you just fail the class.
English is the subject that works with basketball analogy. If you’re bad at logic, you can compensate with a good vocabulary or a creative 'interpretation.' You can be a 'slow' thinker and still 'thrive' because English is a team sport between you and the marker's vibes.
math is not a logic speed test its a layer skill system just like English. English isn't also "vibes and vocabulary" it still requires and understanding of structure reasoning and interpretation of the question
 
math isn't a skill your born with its a skill that you build on with smaller ones such as pattern recognition logic and practice people normally hit ceilings because of missing skills and foundations not because they are incapable
Calling "pattern recognition" and "logic" buildable skills is stupid , those are the literal definitions of FI used in every IQ test on the planet. You can't "practice" your way into higher-tier pattern recognition any more than you can practice having a faster processor, you’re either born with the iq to handle high-level abstraction or you aren't. The "missing foundations" argument is just a blanket for people who hit their intellectual ceiling and want to blame a misse school lesson instead of their own biological limits. If math were just about "stacking blocks," every hard-working student would be einsteins and newtons, but instead, it remains the world’s most effective iq filters specifically because it breaks anyone who lacks the raw mental hp to survive it
 
math is not a logic speed test its a layer skill system just like English. English isn't also "vibes and vocabulary" it still requires and understanding of structure reasoning and interpretation of the question
wronggggg
 
pattern recognition and logic correlate with your cognitive ability but they are fix traits. They improve as you get exposure training and experience. IQ basically influences how fast people learn these skills but it doesn't actually fully determine their ceiling or how they can develop them.
Calling "pattern recognition" and "logic" buildable skills is stupid , those are the literal definitions of FI used in every IQ test on the planet. You can't "practice" your way into higher-tier pattern recognition any more than you can practice having a faster processor, you’re either born with the iq to handle high-level abstraction or you aren't. The "missing foundations" argument is just a blanket for people who hit their intellectual ceiling and want to blame a misse school lesson instead of their own biological limits. If math were just about "stacking blocks," every hard-working student would be einsteins and newtons, but instead, it remains the world’s most effective iq filters specifically because it breaks anyone who lacks the raw mental hp to survive it
 

Similar threads

Alienmaxxer
Replies
10
Views
59
Alienmaxxer
Alienmaxxer
Shammed
Replies
3
Views
30
alurmo
alurmo
islaymtbs
Replies
0
Views
25
islaymtbs
islaymtbs
vesalius
Replies
1
Views
32
fedecope
fedecope
caleb555
Replies
12
Views
70
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top