FiendFiend
Jesus Christ -- ᛏᚱᚢᛏᚺ
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2025
- Posts
- 26,878
- Reputation
- 35,718
I can't believe this is a topic of debate here but here we are. Im swelling from Aqualyx rn so I got nothing better to do so I am going to be making a chart and a system in where you can rate yourself on a SMV scale using looks + height alone.
I will show how the chart does not work the other way round, and how over-importance on height skews the scale and is against the blackpill.
First - Establishing the looks chart. Rehab rooms/FaceLMS Rating scale
This has stood the test of time, and has been around for over a decade. So I don't want to hear any disagreements, point yourself out according to these charts. Usually because of inflation, retard FaceIQ measurements, and new charts, basically put up by 1 PSL the ratings you get from gen alpha children.
LMTN - LHTN etc.
Not every placement here is correct, and can be subjective, but make a mean average of every persons face in every row.
Lets say you are a HTN, top 13.6%ile, tom holland ,andrew garfield level looks, by HTN it means what it means, stop twisting it. Its a slightly above normie. Thats all it is.
Alright, so you are a 5/10, top 13.6 percentile looks male.
Chadlites + Chads, are Chads, so get a 10% boost for being chad to their final score
SUB 3s - Get a -20% Debuff on their final SMV score
Now to the fun part of looks vs heights ratio importance.
Looks account for 60% - Height for 40%
Heres the stats for height :
Sub 5'1 - 0 take off 2.5% for every inch you are under 5'1 from ur final score
5'1 2.5%
5'2 5%
5'3 - 7.5%
5'4 - 10%
5'5 - 12.5%
5'6 - 17.5%
5'7 - 17.5%
5'8 - 20%
5'9 - 22.5%
5'10 - 25%
5'11 - 27.5%
6'0 - 30%
6'1 - 32.5%
6'2 - 35%
6'3 6'4 6'5 - 40% 6'3
6'6 and higher - 40% + add 0.5 at the end of your SMV result.
Now for the equation :
Lets calculate prime Andrew Garfield based on height + looks together , status out the equation.
5/10 LHTN
50% x 60 = 30%
Height - 5'10.5 26.5%
Overall SMV 5.65/10
Higher end of HTN, top 7.5 percentile, use the original looks chart to place yourself.
Now Jon Erik Hexum
8/10 - Unmoggable range
6'2 - 35%
80% x 60% = 48%
+
6'2 - 35%
+ 10% for being chadlite+
9.3/10
1 in billions
Tom Holland
5'7 - 17.5%
Looks - Higher end of HTN - 5.5/10 = 33%
5.05/10 SMV
Top 13.6 percentile male.
Prime Tom Cruise
7/10 -
39%
5'7 - 17.5%
+ 10% for being chad/chadlite
= 6.65/10 SMV
top 2.1 percentile. Chadlite territory.
Prime jeremy meeks
Chad -7/10
Looks - 42%
Height - 6'1 - 32.5%
+ 10% for being chadlite/chad
8.45/10 SMV
Unmoggable territory
King68
HTN - 6/10
6'7 - 45%
6/10 30%
7.5/10 SMV
CHAD SMV
I'd love to see anyone debunk this theory. It is NOT possible.
I will show how the chart does not work the other way round, and how over-importance on height skews the scale and is against the blackpill.
First - Establishing the looks chart. Rehab rooms/FaceLMS Rating scale
This has stood the test of time, and has been around for over a decade. So I don't want to hear any disagreements, point yourself out according to these charts. Usually because of inflation, retard FaceIQ measurements, and new charts, basically put up by 1 PSL the ratings you get from gen alpha children.
LMTN - LHTN etc.
Not every placement here is correct, and can be subjective, but make a mean average of every persons face in every row.
Lets say you are a HTN, top 13.6%ile, tom holland ,andrew garfield level looks, by HTN it means what it means, stop twisting it. Its a slightly above normie. Thats all it is.
Alright, so you are a 5/10, top 13.6 percentile looks male.
Chadlites + Chads, are Chads, so get a 10% boost for being chad to their final score
SUB 3s - Get a -20% Debuff on their final SMV score
Now to the fun part of looks vs heights ratio importance.
Looks account for 60% - Height for 40%
Heres the stats for height :
Sub 5'1 - 0 take off 2.5% for every inch you are under 5'1 from ur final score
5'1 2.5%
5'2 5%
5'3 - 7.5%
5'4 - 10%
5'5 - 12.5%
5'6 - 17.5%
5'7 - 17.5%
5'8 - 20%
5'9 - 22.5%
5'10 - 25%
5'11 - 27.5%
6'0 - 30%
6'1 - 32.5%
6'2 - 35%
6'3 6'4 6'5 - 40% 6'3
6'6 and higher - 40% + add 0.5 at the end of your SMV result.
Now for the equation :
Lets calculate prime Andrew Garfield based on height + looks together , status out the equation.
5/10 LHTN
50% x 60 = 30%
Height - 5'10.5 26.5%
Overall SMV 5.65/10
Higher end of HTN, top 7.5 percentile, use the original looks chart to place yourself.
Now Jon Erik Hexum
8/10 - Unmoggable range
6'2 - 35%
80% x 60% = 48%
+
6'2 - 35%
+ 10% for being chadlite+
9.3/10
1 in billions
Tom Holland
5'7 - 17.5%
Looks - Higher end of HTN - 5.5/10 = 33%
5.05/10 SMV
Top 13.6 percentile male.
Prime Tom Cruise
7/10 -
39%
5'7 - 17.5%
+ 10% for being chad/chadlite
= 6.65/10 SMV
top 2.1 percentile. Chadlite territory.
Prime jeremy meeks
Chad -7/10
Looks - 42%
Height - 6'1 - 32.5%
+ 10% for being chadlite/chad
8.45/10 SMV
Unmoggable territory
King68
HTN - 6/10
6'7 - 45%
6/10 30%
7.5/10 SMV
CHAD SMV
I'd love to see anyone debunk this theory. It is NOT possible.
Attachments
Last edited:
