badexilw
𝙉𝙀𝙐𝙍𝙊𝙏𝙔𝙋𝙄𝘾𝘼𝙇 𝙉𝙊𝙒
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2025
- Posts
- 841
- Reputation
- 524
SINCE MANY ARE LATELY COMPLAINING OF NARROW PALATE THINKING IT IS OVER FOR THEM THERE IS A CRUCIAL SOLUTION THAT NOT ONLY CHANGES THE MAXILLA ,ALSO CHANGES OTHER PARTS OF THE FACE SUCH AS THE CUT OF THE EYES, AN EXTENSION OF THE FACE AND OTHER PARTS;
An upper biomimetic appliance (DNA appliance) that
was prescribed for the non-mandibular advancement half of the
study population with: anterior 3D axial springs, a beaded
pharyngeal extension, a midline screw, bilateral occlusal coverage,
retentive clasps, and a labial bow
Introduction
there's a lot of focus lately on understanding how the face ages. Even dentists are getting more requests for aesthetic enhancements,As we age, we lose muscle tone and supportive fat, which leads to wrinkles and sagging. Fillers help, but since everyone ages differently, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Moisturizers, chemical peels, and dermabrasion can help too, but they're only temporary
FOR different facial features i mean like: asians , niggers and other races
hat’s where it gets more complex. Non-Caucasian faces have unique traits—skin tone, fat distribution, bone structure—so treatments need to be adapted. For example, Korean women often prefer arched eyebrows at mid-height, and many Asians seek a softer, more oval-shaped face.
A holistic approach that includes both soft tissue and bone structure gives more natural results. Interestingly, aging also affects the facial bones—like the maxilla moving downward over time, which can change the way the upper lip and smile look. These bone changes can make features like the nasolabial folds more pronounced too.
Materials, methods and sample
this study where they tested a special oral device to help with midface development.
It’s called the DNA appliance—a biomimetic oral device. Basically, it’s custom-made for each person and has springs and a screw that slowly expands the upper jaw.
hey had 12 people—9 women and 3 men, all around 29 years old. Everyone was over 16, had no facial trauma, no birth defects, and had all their upper teeth. They made sure participants had good oral hygiene and weren’t on meds like bisphosphonates.The patients wore the appliance 12 to 16 hours a day—starting in the afternoon and wearing it overnight. Not during the day though. Each month they came in for check-ups where adjustments were made based on their progress.
after a month or so, depending on how things were going, they added a lower appliance to help align the arches properly.
The craniofacial parameters that were measured in this study were:Frontonasal angle: Angle between 10-9-8Nasolabial angle: Angle between 8-7-6Labiomental angle: Angle between 4-3-2Thyromandibular angle: Angle between 2-1-11
Results
The midface looked fuller after treatment, and certain facial angles—like the labiomental and thyromandibular ones—were less sharp, giving a softer appearance overall.
The labiomental angle went from about 126° to 134°, and the thyromandibular angle went from roughly 127° down to 119°, both with statistically significant improvements.
they used FEA to visualize size changes. The submandibular region shrank by about 32%, and the labiomental region by 20%. Most of the changes were horizontal, which helped contour the face more naturally
The findings of craniofacial parameters measured in this study
Mid-sagittal slices from a 3D cone-beam computerize axial scan, showing the upper airway changes using the same
combined maxillo-mandibular protocol. Note that the upper volume has increased from 11.8cm3 pre-treatment to 27.5cm3
post-treatment, while the minimum cross-sectional area has increased from 141.2cm2 to 379.8cm2 post-treatment, using the
combined maxillo-mandibular protocol
hope this can help someone
An upper biomimetic appliance (DNA appliance) that
was prescribed for the non-mandibular advancement half of the
study population with: anterior 3D axial springs, a beaded
pharyngeal extension, a midline screw, bilateral occlusal coverage,
retentive clasps, and a labial bow
Introduction
there's a lot of focus lately on understanding how the face ages. Even dentists are getting more requests for aesthetic enhancements,As we age, we lose muscle tone and supportive fat, which leads to wrinkles and sagging. Fillers help, but since everyone ages differently, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Moisturizers, chemical peels, and dermabrasion can help too, but they're only temporary
FOR different facial features i mean like: asians , niggers and other races
hat’s where it gets more complex. Non-Caucasian faces have unique traits—skin tone, fat distribution, bone structure—so treatments need to be adapted. For example, Korean women often prefer arched eyebrows at mid-height, and many Asians seek a softer, more oval-shaped face.
A holistic approach that includes both soft tissue and bone structure gives more natural results. Interestingly, aging also affects the facial bones—like the maxilla moving downward over time, which can change the way the upper lip and smile look. These bone changes can make features like the nasolabial folds more pronounced too.
Materials, methods and sample
this study where they tested a special oral device to help with midface development.
It’s called the DNA appliance—a biomimetic oral device. Basically, it’s custom-made for each person and has springs and a screw that slowly expands the upper jaw.
hey had 12 people—9 women and 3 men, all around 29 years old. Everyone was over 16, had no facial trauma, no birth defects, and had all their upper teeth. They made sure participants had good oral hygiene and weren’t on meds like bisphosphonates.The patients wore the appliance 12 to 16 hours a day—starting in the afternoon and wearing it overnight. Not during the day though. Each month they came in for check-ups where adjustments were made based on their progress.
after a month or so, depending on how things were going, they added a lower appliance to help align the arches properly.
The craniofacial parameters that were measured in this study were:Frontonasal angle: Angle between 10-9-8Nasolabial angle: Angle between 8-7-6Labiomental angle: Angle between 4-3-2Thyromandibular angle: Angle between 2-1-11
Results
The midface looked fuller after treatment, and certain facial angles—like the labiomental and thyromandibular ones—were less sharp, giving a softer appearance overall.
The labiomental angle went from about 126° to 134°, and the thyromandibular angle went from roughly 127° down to 119°, both with statistically significant improvements.
they used FEA to visualize size changes. The submandibular region shrank by about 32%, and the labiomental region by 20%. Most of the changes were horizontal, which helped contour the face more naturally
The findings of craniofacial parameters measured in this study
Mid-sagittal slices from a 3D cone-beam computerize axial scan, showing the upper airway changes using the same
combined maxillo-mandibular protocol. Note that the upper volume has increased from 11.8cm3 pre-treatment to 27.5cm3
post-treatment, while the minimum cross-sectional area has increased from 141.2cm2 to 379.8cm2 post-treatment, using the
combined maxillo-mandibular protocol
hope this can help someone
