Maybe de poot eyes are what i need

[Hide]

how can harmony can be both objective and subjective? you said that it depends on mathematical parameters, so it cannot be subjective NOHOW

no, we don't put harmony into an object. it already exists in an object. so it doesn't matter if you are a schizo or not

and so? i agree with that maths being objective. but you haven't explain why beauty is subjective while maths is not (like where's the difference, they are both just muh muh ideas and you think that ideas only float in mind which is nontrue)

yes! you got it!!!! humans see a phenomenon/idea (so if they see it first instead of making it up) so beauty exists independently from human's reason!!! i'm really glad that you have got all that!

The idea of harmony all relies on parameters. Now, there is objective harmony, like mathematical harmony that has the pythagorean theorem, where it id always true in nature. This harmony is something that exists because it id a pure mathematical concept that is objectively talking about the unit size of the object.Now, for example, subjective harmony is where parameters are put. For instance, a 1.35 mouth to nose is a harmony parameter that is inputted subjectively, not objectively because that is an attractive ratio. It really depends on what you describe as harmony, but all in all, it matters in its parameters and where do we go by. Math describes relationships that is seen as nature, while beauty describes the relationships we perceive needing to agree in the first place.

Beauty is not harmony, and harmony is a very broad definition, as beauty requires consciousness and it is an noun and morphed into an adjective that bases from the conscious and never the objective truth. Nothing can be beautiful without internal input because humans are the only species that really describes what is beauty, which is something that we input. Now, whats your favourite color? Mine is navy blue, my head inputted the color, does it mean navy blue id the most beautiful color and it is by all put? No, human tastes perceive differently

Beauty first requires a receiver, its not that we just "create" out of the blue moon, because it is mostly subconcious and it comes from our own biological framework, but it cannot exist without us perceiving and putting it in our head. Its why women like different types of people, it's why people like different colors, it still requires input at the end of the day. There can be true mathematical harmony, but it requires input of man to put.

 

[theRetard]

The idea of harmony all relies on parameters. Now, there is objective harmony, like mathematical harmony that has the pythagorean theorem, where it id always true in nature. This harmony is something that exists because it id a pure mathematical concept that is objectively talking about the unit size of the object.Now, for example, subjective harmony is where parameters are put. For instance, a 1.35 mouth to nose is a harmony parameter that is inputted subjectively, not objectively because that is an attractive ratio. It really depends on what you describe as harmony, but all in all, it matters in its parameters and where do we go by. Math describes relationships that is seen as nature, while beauty describes the relationships we perceive needing to agree in the first place.

Beauty is not harmony, and harmony is a very broad definition, as beauty requires consciousness and it is an noun and morphed into an adjective that bases from the conscious and never the objective truth. Nothing can be beautiful without internal input because humans are the only species that really describes what is beauty, which is something that we input. Now, whats your favourite color? Mine is navy blue, my head inputted the color, does it mean navy blue id the most beautiful color and it is by all put? No, human tastes perceive differently

Beauty first requires a receiver, its not that we just "create" out of the blue moon, but it cannot exist without us perceiving and putting it in our head. Its why women like different types of people, it's why people like different colors, it still requires input at the end of the day. There can be true mathematical harmony, but it requires input of man to put.

it's literally some kantian bullshit ngl
so why can't i say by this idiotic logic that it's beauty is the thing in itself, and it is harmony how you percieve the beauty
and overall if the beauty if how we perceive something, so i can say that this whole "beauty if how we perceive something" is also just your perception so it's this argument is fully retarded

 

[Hide]

it's literally some kantian bullshit ngl
so why can't i say by this idiotic logic that it's beauty is the thing in itself, and it is harmony how you percieve the beauty
and overall if the beauty if how we perceive something, so i can say that this whole "beauty if how we perceive something" is also just your perception so it's this argument is fully retarded

This is the most braindead argument I've ever read, you sounded logical everywhere until you said this. You have used the biggest logical fallacy I've ever heard and I've been in school debates hearing worse.

Fucking retarded nigger thinks you can switch cause and effect like bullets

Youre trying to switch a thing and an effect, if I hear something, im hearing the frequency

If I think, im thinking of an idea.

If I perceive that is beautiful, im perceiving an object a harmony, its colors, etc.

The definition of beauty literally comes from the input of human senses. We are finding that shit beautiful. Beauty is mainly focused on satisfying human senses.

 

[theRetard]

This is the most braindead argument I've ever read, you sounded logical everywhere until you said this. You have used the biggest logical fallacy I've ever heard and I've been in school debates hearing worse.

Fucking retarded nigger thinks you can switch cause and effect like bullets

Youre trying to switch a thing and an effect, if I hear something, im hearing the frequency

If I think, im thinking of an idea.

If I perceive that is beautiful, im perceiving an object a harmony, its colors, etc.

The definition of beauty literally comes from the input of human senses. We are finding that shit beautiful. Beauty is mainly focused on satisfying human senses.

so wtf does this disprove?
you literally said that beautiful is how we see the harmony, why can't i replace them with each other? so it's the HARMONY how we see the BEAUTY. they are literally the same thing, cuz your bullshit about if there's a distinction between how we see the some thing (harmony here) is also JUST YOUR FUCKING PERCETION

 

[theRetard]

This is the most braindead argument I've ever read, you sounded logical everywhere until you said this. You have used the biggest logical fallacy I've ever heard and I've been in school debates hearing worse.

Fucking retarded nigger thinks you can switch cause and effect like bullets

Youre trying to switch a thing and an effect, if I hear something, im hearing the frequency

If I think, im thinking of an idea.

If I perceive that is beautiful, im perceiving an object a harmony, its colors, etc.

The definition of beauty literally comes from the input of human senses. We are finding that shit beautiful. Beauty is mainly focused on satisfying human senses.

you are either using the chatgpt without giving him the context of the debate, or just you really don't fuckign understand that your position is self-refuting

 

[Hide]

you are either using the chatgpt without giving him the context of the debate, or just you really don't fuckign understand that your position is self-refuting

Pls go in detail how am I fucking up

Because I repeatedly am explaining input and output nigga

Cause and effect

I see an object, a ratio, that I can input, and j find it beautiful

Some harminy is purely mathematical while others require input

Is the number gravity 9.81 acceleration a harmony that we just think subjectively nigga when its derived from the law of universal gravitational

Skme harmony is objective while others arent

beauty legit is an noun, beautiful is an adjective nigga


This ks the trillionth time i am explaining that something is a description, a shape is an object and i am descriping its beautiful
 

so wtf does this disprove?
you literally said that beautiful is how we see the harmony, why can't i replace them with each other? so it's the HARMONY how we see the BEAUTY. they are literally the same thing, cuz your bullshit about if there's a distinction between how we see the some thing (harmony here) is also JUST YOUR FUCKING PERCETION

 

[Hide]

so wtf does this disprove?
you literally said that beautiful is how we see the harmony, why can't i replace them with each other? so it's the HARMONY how we see the BEAUTY. they are literally the same thing, cuz your bullshit about if there's a distinction between how we see the some thing (harmony here) is also JUST YOUR FUCKING PERCETION

And also, last sentence is true but how we categorise things in general is our perception

2 pi r is our way of categorising the circumference of a circle but it is an objective truth that goes by nature

Now, i have outlined what the fuck is an harmony and what the fuck is beauty using basic Google definitions

You thinking beauty is objective using ur logic is ur perception

Yes mf it is my perception I am arguing with your perception on why its wrong

 

[theRetard]

Pls go in detail how am I fucking up

Because I repeatedly am explaining input and output nigga

Cause and effect

I see an object, a ratio, that I can input, and j find it beautiful

Some harminy is purely mathematical while others require input

Is the number gravity 9.81 acceleration a harmony that we just think subjectively nigga when its derived from the law of universal gravitational

Skme harmony is objective while others arent

beauty legit is an noun, beautiful is an adjective nigga


This ks the trillionth time i am explaining that something is a description, a shape is an object and i am descriping its beautiful
 

-just repeat your self-refuting bullshit theory

 

[Hide]

-just repeat your self-refuting bullshit theory

Damn nigga you are looking at the conclusion and not where I am deriving the argument, I see this tactic everyday and its always the same; approach is different

This is a very basic thinking jfl

 

[theRetard]

also first you said that features>harmony, so therefore feautures are more beautiful than harmony. and now you are saying that muh beauty is our perception of harmony.
it's chatgpt generates you this bullshit though, i'm pretty sure

 

[Hide]

also first you said that features>harmony, so therefore feautures are more beautiful than harmony. and now you are saying that muh beauty is our perception of harmony.
it's chatgpt generates you this bullshit though, i'm pretty sure

I mentioned features in the concept of face and if you want me to argue about face go ahead to do because I have one case study and that is Ian somerhalder

J cam mention so many beautiful chads with shit harmony

Were arging general and not faces

I am trhing my best to explain basic englishI mentioned features, harmony, colors jfl

I mentioned an object im going purely abstract

 

[Hide]

also first you said that features>harmony, so therefore feautures are more beautiful than harmony. and now you are saying that muh beauty is our perception of harmony.
it's chatgpt generates you this bullshit though, i'm pretty sure

Are you debating on the face or are you debating about beauty in general

Ive repeatedly explained it

Also harmony can be beautiful, but features are always triumphed

E^ipi+1=0 is pretty beautiful tbh but i like a nice booty ass and I find it beautiful

I just went to harmony route because I think you keep misusing the term beauty itself

If we wanna argue about beautiful features I am here nigga

 

[theRetard]

Damn nigga you are looking at the conclusion and not where I am deriving the argument, I see this tactic everyday and its always the same; approach is different

This is a very basic thinking jfl

-chatgpt

I mentioned features in the concept of face and if you want me to argue about face go ahead to do because I have one case study and that is Ian somerhalder

J cam mention so many beautiful chads with shit harmony

Were arging general and not faces

I am trhing my best to explain basic englishI mentioned features, harmony, colors jfl

I mentioned an object im going purely abstract

Are you debating on the face or are you debating about beauty in general

Ive repeatedly explained it

Also harmony can be beautiful, but features are always triumphed

E^ipi+1=0 is pretty beautiful tbh but i like a nice booty ass and I find it beautiful

I just went to harmony route because I think you keep misusing the term beauty itself

If we wanna argue about beautiful features I am here nigga

well so the mechanism of harmony is not beautiful.
it doesn't really disprove anything what i said. it's like saying that computer programs are just the code

 

[flatcheck213]

Low trust eyes that are extremely dimorphic and extremely intimitading

My dad has the same and hes giga intimitading with alot of aura

Maybe just maybe that low trust eye is key

High trust everything else low trust eyes theory?

One of the highest appeal eye areas ever btw

View attachment 4241471

Foids would choose this over de poo any day

 

[Ghoulish]

View attachment 4241977

To us .org psl schizophrenics Yeah his eye area mogs zayns
But to foids zayn mogs brutally, but Elias still has a very good eye area

Zayns eye area is just the best female gaze imaginable, only comparable eye area is atesh salihs but even he gets mogged by a small amount

 

[Hide]

View attachment 4241977

Have you seen foids comment on his eye area

They think hes really cute when hes not squinting jfl

 

[SAQUIB66]

One of the highest appeal eye areas ever btw

View attachment 4241471

Foids would choose this over de poo any day

This mf moggs depoot to absolute oblivion.

 

[Hide]

This mf moggs depoot to absolute oblivion.

Let's see his eyes unsquinted no fraud

 

[SAQUIB66]

Let's see his eyes unsquinted no fraud

Squint or unsquint doesn't fucking matter. That dude Zayn moggs everyone to absolute oblivion except some exceptions.