Maybe genetic diversity is a meme

[Looks234]

Coincidence that Somalia and India are there

 

[Deleted member 14455]

It's really simple:

You mix dry shit with diarrhea, it's shit.

You mix vanilla and chocolate, it's tasty.

 

[TsarTsar444]

All places with the worst phenos JFL, over for race mix coppers

 

[gamma]

over for race mix coppers

Indeed

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Exactly this is why race mixing is bad pure nonmix races like Europeans, Africans and Asians look a lot better than their mix counterparts

 

[Looks234]

Exactly this is why race mixing is bad pure nonmix races like Europeans, Africans and Asians look a lot better than their mix counterparts

Nobody’s pure

 

[gamma]

Nobody’s pure

A lot of europeans are 99% european

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Exactly this is why race mixing is bad pure nonmix races like Europeans, Africans and Asians look a lot better than their mix counterparts

Can you prove it?

 

[Deleted member 6273]

A lot of europeans are 99% european

Yes but also with neanderthal dna so technically a product of sub spiecies mixing like most other humans.

 

[Deleted member 14667]

View attachment 1243193

Coincidence that Somalia and India are there

View attachment 1243192View attachment 1243194

racial mixing never turns out well tbf

 

[Looks234]

A lot of europeans are 99% european

Meds have middle eastern dna, Balkans have Asian dna probably some middle eastern too, And some Northern Europeans have Asian dna.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Yes but also with neanderthal dna so technically a product of sub spiecies mixing like most other humans.

Well Africans have ghosts dna but Caucasians have more arcadic mixture than Africans

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Meds have middle eastern dna, Balkans have Asian dna probably some middle eastern too, And some Northern Europeans have Asian dna.

Africans like west central and nilo Saharans are not mixed

 

[Looks234]

Africans like west central and nilo Saharans are not mixed

Maasai’s have west Eurasian dna

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Well Africans have ghosts dna but Caucasians have more arcadic mixture than Africans

Yeah and? My point is that there's nothing like a pure race, people can't even give a scientific definition of what constitutes a race, most current phenotypes are as a result of "race/sub-species/out-group" mixing.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Maasai’s have west Eurasian dna

View attachment 1243273

That’s inaccurate because those Eurasians technically were Africans. Those Eurasians genetically were 30 percent sub Saharan African and 30 percent North African plus these Eurasians predated Europeans and Arabs

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Yeah and? My point is that there's nothing like a pure race, people can't even give a scientific definition of what constitutes a race, most current phenotypes are as a result of "race/sub-species/out-group" mixing.

Yes it no but phenotypes are mostly developed due to environmental pressures for example the south native Americans had darker skin and wider noses while the North American natives had light skin hooked noses and a more Caucasian phenotype. Certain traits are developed due to environment

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Yes it no but phenotypes are mostly developed due to environmental pressures for example the south native Americans had darker skin and wider noses while the North American natives had light skin hooked noses and a more Caucasian phenotype. Certain traits are developed due to environment

Yeah but what does that have to do with my point though?

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Maasai’s have west Eurasian dna

View attachment 1243273

Plus the same thing happened to the Nubians
This study proves it https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.17.431423v1

 

[Deleted member 2632]

Nobody’s pure

Yeah bro no Wolf is 100% pure the same bloodline, they have mixed with other Wolves therefore there is no difference between a Chihuahua and a Timber Wolf they are all canines, they all bleed red !

Stop judging canines by their fur color !

 

[Deleted member 5802]

Yeah but what does that have to do with my point though?

Race is people with the same genetics and similar phenotypes race is completely real only Leftiest say race is a social construct

 

[Looks234]

Yeah bro no Wolf is 100% pure the same bloodline, they have mixed with other Wolves therefore there is no difference between a Chihuahua and a Timber Wolf they are all canines, they all bleed red !

We’re not wolves. Humans travel all over the place. Kingdoms get invaded. Mixing just happens naturally.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Race is people with the same genetics and similar phenotypes race is completely real only Leftiest say race is a social construct

I just said can you give a proper, consistent scientific description I didn't say it didn't exist

 

[Looks234]

Muslims invaded Europe, Mongols invaded Europe. But muhh pure aryans

@Chadlite Rutherford

 

[Deleted member 2632]

We’re not wolves. Humans travel all over the place. Kingdoms get invaded. Mixing just happens naturally.

" Evolution only applies to animals and plants, us humans are not affected in any way shape or form biologically by spending 100,000's of years isolated in one region of the Earth "

 

[Looks234]

" Evolution only applies to animals and plants, us humans are not affected in any way shape or form biologically by spending 100,000's of years isolated in one region of the Earth "

Homosapiens are a relatively new species. Jfl at you comparing us to wolves who’ve been around longer.

 

[Deleted member 2632]

Homosapiens are a relatively new species. Jfl at you comparing us to wolves who’ve been around longer.

And chihuahuas are much younger than Homo Sapiens and yet the difference between a Wolf and Chihuahua is quite significant

 

[Deleted member 5802]

" Evolution only applies to animals and plants, us humans are not affected in any way shape or form biologically by spending 100,000's of years isolated in one region of the Earth "

Yeah he’s right humans are extremely genetically similar to each other. Really there’s no such thing as race since you can find other supposed “ separate races having similar phenotypes to each other” the human race is not diverse enough for us ri be classified as races

 

[Deleted member 5802]

And chihuahuas are much younger than Homo Sapiens and yet the difference between a Wolf and Chihuahua is quite significant

That’s because we selectively breeded them they are genetically distinct from wolves due to selective breeding

 

[Looks234]

And chihuahuas are much younger than Homo Sapiens and yet the difference between a Wolf and Chihuahua is quite significant

Chihuahuas are cross breeds. Homo sapiens evolved exclusively.

 

[Deleted member 2632]

Yeah he’s right humans are extremely genetically similar to each other. Really there’s no such thing as race since you can find other supposed “ separate races having similar phenotypes to each other” the human race is not diverse enough for us ri be classified as races

No they aren't, race is a nonsense word, we are subspecies of the human species

MuH GeNEtiC SimiLArities

And human beings DNA is almost identical to chickens, most of your DNA decides whether you turn into a plant or animal

 

[Deleted member 5802]

No they aren't, race is a nonsense word, we are subspecies of the human species

MuH GeNEtiC SimiLArities

And human beings DNA is almost identical to chickens, most of your DNA decides whether you turn into a plant or animal

So these guys are the same race as sub Saharan Africans despite genetically being Asian?

 

[hairyballscel]

A lot of europeans are 99% european

cope

 

[hairyballscel]

Africans like west central and nilo Saharans are not mixed

west africans are mixed a little bit, very small but its there, some nilo saharans aswell, dinka people are pure doe

 

[Looks234]

No they aren't, race is a nonsense word, we are subspecies of the human species

MuH GeNEtiC SimiLArities

And human beings DNA is almost identical to chickens, most of your DNA decides whether you turn into a plant or animal

Homo erectus first appeared 2 million years ago. Homo sapiens first appeared 300,000-500,000 years ago. Humans haven’t been around long enough to form new species, it’s literally common sense.

 

[Deleted member 5802]

west africans are mixed a little bit, very small but its there, some nilo saharans aswell, dinka people are pure doe

That mixture from west and nilo Saharans we’re African in nature a new study proved this. “Eurasian” can be a very misleading term according to genetics and cranial studies those “Eurasians” were African in nature

 

[hairyballscel]

Plus the same thing happened to the Nubians
This study proves it https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.17.431423v1

you are right to an extent, much of the so called "west eurasian" dna in africans is really indigenous to north africa and is just african genetic substructure, recall taforalt being significantly natufian while predating natufians....

but we don't know to what extent the "west eurasian" in these nubians is african and what is legitimately west eurasian, its a combo of both

 

[Deleted member 5802]

you are right to an extent, much of the so called "west eurasian" dna in africans is really indigenous to north africa and is just african genetic substructure, recall taforalt being significantly natufian while predating natufians....

but we don't know to what extent the "west eurasian" in these nubians is african and what is legitimately west eurasian, its a combo of both

Yeah that study proved that without the Eurasian dna Nubians still look the same way as they do now I can link that study if you want. This tells us that excluding the Amhara horners are not really mixed ether

 

[hairyballscel]

That mixture from west and nilo Saharans we’re African in nature a new study proved this. “Eurasian” can be a very misleading term according to genetics and cranial studies those “Eurasians” were African in nature

while i do agree with you that a lot of what researchers call eurasian is really just african, but in the case of yoruba nigerians, they have actual neanderthal dna

Moreover, our model predicts that West Africans (represented by Yoruba) had 12.5±1.1% ancestry from a Taforalt related group rather than Taforalt having ancestry from an unknown Sub-Saharan African source11 174 ; this may have mediated the limited Neanderthal admixture present in West Africans.
- Paleolithic DNA from the Caucasus reveals 2 core of West Eurasian ancestry

 

[Deleted member 2632]

Homo erectus first appeared 2 million years ago. Homo sapiens first appeared 300,000-500,000 years ago. Humans haven’t been around long enough to form new species, it’s literally common sense.

Thats why the scientific word is called " subspecies "

 

[Deleted member 5802]

while i do agree with you that a lot of what researchers call eurasian is really just african, but in the case of yoruba nigerians, they have actual neanderthal dna

Moreover, our model predicts that West Africans (represented by Yoruba) had 12.5±1.1% ancestry from a Taforalt related group rather than Taforalt having ancestry from an unknown Sub-Saharan African source11 174 ; this may have mediated the limited Neanderthal admixture present in West Africans.
- Paleolithic DNA from the Caucasus reveals 2 core of West Eurasian ancestry

When the Sahara used to be wet and green that Neanderthal dna would had came from northern Africans the reasons we didn’t see too much Neanderthal dna in west Africa is because the Saharan dried up. Cave paintings proved that darker skinned people lived in Africa but due to the North African environment developed lighter skin, and Caucasian features and due to interaction with Europe.

 

[hairyballscel]

Yeah that study proved that without the Eurasian dna Nubians still look the same way as they do now I can link that study if you want.

yhh link pls

This tells us that excluding the Amhara horners are not really mixed ether

no bro, there is actual neanderthal in the horn, not just amharas, but oromos, somalis, tigrinyas etc...

either way, it doesn't change the fact that the idea that horners are 40-60% non african is bullshit, but they do have some real non african dna, of course, the numbers arent as high as researchers say, keep in mind that groups like south arabians who would have introduced this non african dna into eritrea/ethiopia, carried some pre historic iranian ancestry, which was rich in basal eurasian which is a north african ancestry itself, so a lot of the eurasian groups horners were mixing with would have been pretty mixed with north african ancestry themselves

we wont know the true figures until we have paleolithic dna from north and east africa

 

[Looks234]

Thats why the scientific word is called " subspecies "

Humans can breed with each other and have healthy kids so we’re the same species.

And before you use the Horse and Donkey example. Most Mules are infertile. Mullatos like Jeremy Meeks aren’t infertile.

 

[Deleted member 2632]

Humans can breed with each other and have healthy kids so we’re the same species.

And before you use the Horse and Donkey example. Most Mules are infertile. Mullatos like Jeremy Meeks aren’t infertile.

Horses and Donkey are not subspecies

The very definition of subspecies means they can interbreed and have fertile offspring

 

[Cidre enjoyer]

makes sense that france is not there
everyone is black here so you can't have genetic diversity

 

[Deleted member 5802]

yhh link pls

no bro, there is actual neanderthal in the horn, not just amharas, but oromos, somalis, tigrinyas etc...

either way, it doesn't change the fact that the idea that horners are 40-60% non african is bullshit, but they do have some real non african dna, of course, the numbers arent as high as researchers say, keep in mind that groups like south arabians who would have introduced this non african dna into eritrea/ethiopia, carried some pre historic iranian ancestry, which was rich in basal eurasian which is a north african ancestry itself, so a lot of the eurasian groups horners were mixing with would have been pretty mixed with north african ancestry themselves

we wont know the true figures until we have paleolithic dna from north and east africa

Yeah I agree horners naturally on average have up to 10-15 percent middle eastern dna due to trade and interaction but 30-40 percent Eurasian dna is misleading when those Eurasians themselves were African here’s the study

the study https://www.researchgate.net/public..._site_of_Kulubnarti_in_Christian_Period_Nubia

a good video breaking down Nubian dna

 

[Beetlejuice]

 

[Deleted member 5802]

yhh link pls

no bro, there is actual neanderthal in the horn, not just amharas, but oromos, somalis, tigrinyas etc...

either way, it doesn't change the fact that the idea that horners are 40-60% non african is bullshit, but they do have some real non african dna, of course, the numbers arent as high as researchers say, keep in mind that groups like south arabians who would have introduced this non african dna into eritrea/ethiopia, carried some pre historic iranian ancestry, which was rich in basal eurasian which is a north african ancestry itself, so a lot of the eurasian groups horners were mixing with would have been pretty mixed with north african ancestry themselves

we wont know the true figures until we have paleolithic dna from north and east africa

This info confirms that the Nubians ( not counting the arab Sudanese) are not really mixed and genetically they are related to horners making it highly likely that it’s the same for horners.
I excluded Amharas because they mixed Eurasians 3.000 years ago a lot more recent that’s why the have lighter skin compared to the Oromo and afar

 

[Deleted member 14563]

View attachment 1243193

Coincidence that Somalia and India are there

View attachment 1243192View attachment 1243194

I bet an ethnic made that map.