Meat is unworthy for DHA. Fish is always better.

KindMaster1

KindMaster1

Face, Redpill, Devotion
Joined
Dec 17, 2024
Posts
757
Reputation
511
TLDDR: you barely survive eating meat, because the bare minimum scraps of DHA are there, surprisingly. All sub5s had a deficiency and deteriorated.

500 grams of raw chicken thigh.

Omega 3. 0.8 grams.

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). 0.03 grams.

Alpha linoleic acid (3 percent of which gets converted into DHA when you eat it). 0.7 grams.

Pork chops with fat have 2 times less omega 3, and 2 times less ALA, and several times less DHA.

This is a typical (factory farmed) meat.


Now, let's compare this with a different type of food.

Enter: mackerel.
1 kilogram of raw mackerel (800 grams of boneless flesh). 17 grams of omega 3. 10 grams of DHA.


Jack Kruse said to Weston A. Price people, that their grass fed meat is not enough, even if raw grass eating herbivores can get enough DHA, and high DHA seafood is necessary.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: VrillFatNoob24, vincentzygo and EliasDePoop
TLDDR: you barely survive eating meat, because the bare minimum scraps of DHA are there, surprisingly. All sub5s had a deficiency and deteriorated.

500 grams of raw chicken thigh.

Omega 3. 0.8 grams.

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). 0.03 grams.

Alpha linoleic acid (3 percent of which gets converted into DHA when you eat it). 0.7 grams.

Pork chops with fat have 2 times less omega 3, and 2 times less ALA, and several times less DHA.

This is a typical (factory farmed) meat.


Now, let's compare this with a different type of food.

Enter: mackerel.
1 kilogram of raw mackerel (800 grams of boneless flesh). 17 grams of omega 3. 10 grams of DHA.


Jack Kruse said to Weston A. Price people, that their grass fed meat is not enough, even if raw grass eating herbivores can get enough DHA, and high DHA seafood is necessary.
bros glazing mackercel every day
 
  • +1
Reactions: KindMaster1
TLDDR: you barely survive eating meat, because the bare minimum scraps of DHA are there, surprisingly. All sub5s had a deficiency and deteriorated.

500 grams of raw chicken thigh.

Omega 3. 0.8 grams.

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). 0.03 grams.

Alpha linoleic acid (3 percent of which gets converted into DHA when you eat it). 0.7 grams.

Pork chops with fat have 2 times less omega 3, and 2 times less ALA, and several times less DHA.

This is a typical (factory farmed) meat.


Now, let's compare this with a different type of food.

Enter: mackerel.
1 kilogram of raw mackerel (800 grams of boneless flesh). 17 grams of omega 3. 10 grams of DHA.


Jack Kruse said to Weston A. Price people, that their grass fed meat is not enough, even if raw grass eating herbivores can get enough DHA, and high DHA seafood is necessary.
Compare 10 grams of DHA vs 0.03.
This is a 333 times difference!
 
  • +1
Reactions: vincentzygo
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop and vincentzygo
OP is a fish 🐟
 
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop and KindMaster1
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop and vincentzygo
mackerel are prone to having toxic heavy metals
 
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop and KindMaster1
mackerel are prone to having toxic heavy metals
Probably why they taste so weird.

If you can afford it, then eat herrings. This is the most delicious raw fish and it costs only 1.5 times more than mackerel. Netherlanders eat it raw, and they look excellent.

I think toxins are irrelevant when faced with the sheer overall positive effect of DHA (for people living in cold latitude like Europeans).
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop and LegendaryKennen
mackerel are prone to having toxic heavy metals
I didn't clarify why overall it is worth it.

Cold latitude people need DHA to avoid extreme deterioration from the environment of 0 UV sunlight 3 seasons of year, meaning lack of light energy (which is stored and used), plus on top of that, stress of the cold, where our mitochondria need DHA and our cells need DHA to handle heat production and storage of heat based light based electricity inside cells.

DHA is also needed for all looksmaxxers and intelligencemaxxers in general because all cells are made out of DHA and our intestines are made out of DHA, meaning entirety of cellular functioning and digestion of nutrients depends on DHA.
Anti ageing talk should always start with DHA, basically.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop and LegendaryKennen
I didn't clarify why overall it is worth it.

Cold latitude people need DHA to avoid extreme deterioration from the environment of 0 UV sunlight 3 seasons of year, meaning lack of light energy (which is stored and used), plus on top of that, stress of the cold, where our mitochondria need DHA and our cells need DHA to handle heat production and storage of heat based light based electricity inside cells.

DHA is also needed for all looksmaxxers and intelligencemaxxers in general because all cells are made out of DHA and our intestines are made out of DHA, meaning entirety of cellular functioning and digestion of nutrients depends on DHA.
Anti ageing talk should always start with DHA, basically.
what about eating larger (wild caught) fish as a middle ground
 
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop and KindMaster1
what about eating larger (wild caught) fish as a middle ground
As long as they are high in DHA per 100 grams. DHA is not omega 3, but it's component. DHA gets accumulated in fish which live in cold latitude (high latitude), because they need it for themselves to produce heat and store heat based light inside of their cells, to handle cold environment's stress and lack of sunlight.

Larger fish is oftentimes superior in terms of nutrition in general, because they're probably carnivore, or otherwise unlimited when it comes to nutrition they themselves consume. I would guess that sardines are an exception, when it comes to rule of thumb that larger animal is always more nutritious.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop and LegendaryKennen
what about the fact that fish are 1/4 of plastic nowadays
 
  • +1
Reactions: KindMaster1 and EliasDePoop
  • +1
Reactions: KindMaster1 and copester2
what about the fact that fish are 1/4 of plastic nowadays
Coastal a little bit. I will still eat it. There is no alternative.

Sea fish, and deep sea fish? They are pristine clean.
 
Coastal a little bit. I will still eat it. There is no alternative.

Sea fish, and deep sea fish? They are pristine clean.
arent there like heavy metals in deep sea fish?
 
arent there like heavy metals in deep sea fish?
Natural metals. As long as you eat that fish raw, you get 0 damage, and incredible health and detox from real artificial toxic metals. Those fishes need and utilize those metals, gathering them from food, including for rapid movement upwards.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EliasDePoop

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top