Men are evil, women are morally superior

selective empathy is contained within the category of empathy, so it is equivalent to empathy
if a micropenis is contained within the category of penis, does it mean it's equivalent to a 8x6?
 
if a micropenis is contained within the category of penis, does it mean it's equivalent to a 8x6?
no, because 8x6 is an entirely different category, which categorically excludes the penises contained within the category of "micropenis"

but micropenis is still fully within the category of "penis" and is equivalent to it
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
no, because 8x6 is an entirely different category, which categorically excludes the penises contained within the category of "micropenis"

but micropenis is still fully within the category of "penis" and is equivalent to it
according to your logic then they're equivalent since they're both penises

once again, selective empathy ≠ empathy.
micropenis ≠ 8x6

both are in the same category yet are completely different
 
  • +1
Reactions: truthhurts
once again, selective empathy ≠ empathy.
micropenis ≠ 8x6

both are in the same category yet are completely different
not analogous, empathy is the broader category, and "selective empathy" falls within it
micropenis and 8x6 are entire different categories of penises, both contained within "penis"

every example of "selective empathy" is a particular example of empathy, and you can easily be more empathetic even if youre just "selectively" empathetic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover
not analogous, empathy is the broader category, and "selective empathy" falls within it
micropenis and 8x6 are entire different categories of penises, both contained within "penis"

every example of "selective empathy" is a particular example of empathy, and you can easily be more empathetic even if youre just "selectively" empathetic.
this like me saying

"men with micropenises have more penis than women"

and you saying

"nooo, micropenises are NOT penises, and there are transwomen with 8x6 so technically women have more penis than men with micropenises!"

holy shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover and truthhurts
not analogous, empathy is the broader category, and "selective empathy" falls within it
micropenis and 8x6 are entire different categories of penises, both contained within "penis"

every example of "selective empathy" is a particular example of empathy, and you can easily be more empathetic even if youre just "selectively" empathetic.
so women ignoring, if not insulting, the feelings of at least 60% of the male population is them being empathetic?
they're the more empathetic gender?

males are more empathetic but at the same time more logical so they simply don't care.
doesn't change the fact they can still feel empathy for said 60% of the male population which women disregard.
males empthatise more but care less, women empathise less but care more (about the small fraction of men they actually can empathise with)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Melly, noodlelover and truthhurts
selective empathy ≠ empathy
so women ignoring, if not insulting, the feelings of at least 60% of the male population is them being empathetic?
they're the more empathetic gender?

males are more empathetic but at the same time more logical so they simply don't care.
doesn't change the fact they can still feel empathy for said 60% of the male population which women disregard.
males empthatise more but care less, women empathise less but care more (about the small fraction of men they actually can empathise with)
this like me saying

"men with micropenises have more penis than women"

and you saying

"nooo, micropenises are NOT penises, and there are transwomen with 8x6 so technically women have more penis than men with micropenises!"

holy shit

It's pretty hard to compare.

Women have higher levels of empathy, generally, but are far more selective with it.

While men have lower levels, but are far more generous with it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: raleqtambrobret
so women ignoring, if not insulting, the feelings of at least 60% of the male population is them being empathetic?
they're the more empathetic gender?
if the men have done something to personally offend them then it could easily be an act of empathy

they simply empathized with men and found out what men need is some TOUGH love (meaning being ignored and insulted)

males are more empathetic but at the same time more logical so they simply don't care.
>empathetic
>dont care

pick one. logic would lead men to use their empathy where they desperately need it in their lives (which they usually refuse to do)

oesn't change the fact they can still feel empathy for said 60% of the male population which women disregard.
what if disregarding them is the act of empathy, while forming identitarian movements with the 60% is the showcase of a LACK of empathy by men?

males empthatise more but care less, women empathise less but care more (about the small fraction of men they actually can empathise with)
other way around - men are usually more caring but less empathetic than women, which is why they're bad at consoling their female partners, despite desperately wanting to, or why they're terrible at creating social movements despite wanting to fix society (and usually doing it in the wrong way, like fascism and communism)
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover
It's pretty hard to compare.

Women have higher levels of empathy, generally, but are far more selective with it.

While men have lower levels, but are far more generous with it.
at the end, men are more empathetic
if the men have done something to personally offend them then it could easily be an act of empathy

they simply empathized with men and found out what men need is some TOUGH love (meaning being ignored and insulted)


>empathetic
>dont care

pick one. logic would lead men to use their empathy where they desperately need it in their lives (which they usually refuse to do)
what do you mean pick one?
empathy is the capacity to understand/feel what another person is experiencing, not caring about them.
if women disregard most of the male population that is NOT empathetic.
what if disregarding them is the act of empathy, while forming identitarian movements with the 60% is the showcase of a LACK of empathy by men?
how would disregarding (ignoring) a social being be an act of empathy?
other way around - men are usually more caring but less empathetic than women, which is why they're bad at consoling their female partners, despite desperately wanting to, or why they're terrible at creating social movements despite wanting to fix society (and usually doing it in the wrong way, like fascism and communism)
no.
if a male can empathise with 100% of the male population whereas a woman can only empathise with the top 40% of the male population then you do the simple math and come back to me with the answer.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: noodlelover
what do you mean pick one?
empathy is the capacity to understand/feel what another person is experiencing, not caring about them.
if women disregard most of the male population that is NOT empathetic.
and if the other person is experiencing something negative, you'd be naturally inclined to help
empathy implies action, you cant just feel someone else's pain and not react - not reacting would imply not feeling

how would disregarding (ignoring) a social being be an act of empathy?
letting people figure shit out by themselves, thus developing character

no.
if a male can empathise with 100% of the male population whereas a woman can only empathise with the top 40% of the male population then you do the simple math and come back to me with the answer.
Females - can empathize with 40% of men and 100% of women
Men - can empathize with 100% of men and 0% of women

Females - 140%
Males - 100%

Looks like females win this one
 
and if the other person is experiencing something negative, you'd be naturally inclined to help
empathy implies action, you cant just feel someone else's pain and not react - not reacting would imply not feeling
nonsense
most people can see another suffering but will leave it to someone else to help said person in need, because most people are selfish.
does that mean most of the population are unempathetic sociopaths? no.

empathy is a prerequisite to helping another without ulterior motives, it does not imply action.
a reaction from empathy would be emotional, not physical. you can see someone sad and feel sad for them but that doesn't mean you have an urge to help them.
letting people figure shit out by themselves, thus developing character
are you implying that the 60% of males seen as subhuman by women should just figure their shit out and change their genetics?
it doesn't work like that, you bluepilled muppet.

muh developing character, you mean getting traumatised?
your base personality is genetic, any other comes from environment in the form of trauma.
before you try to debunk that sentence by saying 'muh ppl become egotistical from good experiences'... no.... people are born egotistical. some are just kicked down by life.
all kids by nature are egotistical brats, they're just kicked down by the people around them to be obedient.
Females - can empathize with 40% of men and 100% of women
Men - can empathize with 100% of men and 0% of women
women don't empathise with women outside of their families.
men empathise with women in their families & women they find fuckable (pretty much all women, 90% as a guess, probably an underestimate)
Females - 140%
Males - 100%
Females - 40% + whatever percentage is related to them ( I am not doing the math )
Males - 190% + whatever percentages is related to them.
Looks like females win this one
Nope.
 
nonsense
most people can see another suffering but will leave it to someone else to help said person in need, because most people are selfish.
does that mean most of the population are unempathetic sociopaths? no.

empathy is a prerequisite to helping another without ulterior motives, it does not imply action.
a reaction from empathy would be emotional, not physical. you can see someone sad and feel sad for them but that doesn't mean you have an urge to help them.

are you implying that the 60% of males seen as subhuman by women should just figure their shit out and change their genetics?
it doesn't work like that, you bluepilled muppet.

muh developing character, you mean getting traumatised?
your base personality is genetic, any other comes from environment in the form of trauma.
before you try to debunk that sentence by saying 'muh ppl become egotistical from good experiences'... no.... people are born egotistical. some are just kicked down by life.
all kids by nature are egotistical brats, they're just kicked down by the people around them to be obedient.

women don't empathise with women outside of their families.
men empathise with women in their families & women they find fuckable (pretty much all women, 90% as a guess, probably an underestimate)

Females - 40% + whatever percentage is related to them ( I am not doing the math )
Males - 190% + whatever percentages is related to them.

Nope.
Have you ever went outside a single time in your adult life? You talk like someone who is severely out of touch with society and reality
 
Have you ever went outside a single time in your adult life? You talk like someone who is severely out of touch with society and reality
you talk like someone who is severely out of touch with society and reality if you think women genuinely empathise with other women
is that why female friendships basically never last? is that why they can be ended over the smallest thing?

muh empathetic gender.
 
you talk like someone who is severely out of touch with society and reality if you think women genuinely empathise with other women
is that why female friendships basically never last? is that why they can be ended over the smallest thing?

muh empathetic gender.
Its time for you to leave your room and get some social interaction, especially with women, so you can finally feel some empathy
 
Its time for you to leave your room and get some social interaction, especially with women, so you can finally feel some empathy
i genuinely didn't know what i expected from arguing with a bluepilled 15 year old tiktokcel
 
your little sister is the same worth as bill gates or jeff bezos, because they are the ones who can create new humans. we are just robots doing everything for them to create a new child
 
Neither men nor women are truly moral.
But men are more likely to admit so.
 
your little sister is the same worth as bill gates or jeff bezos, because they are the ones who can create new humans. we are just robots doing everything for them to create a new child
Basically saying "Women are birthing machines“. Abstain from replying to my threads in the future, you imbecile. No woman wants or needs your sperm, you loser.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Melly and wsada
Basically saying "Women are birthing machines“. Abstain from replying to my threads in the future, you imbecile. No woman wants or needs your sperm, you loser.
they are though lil bro, accept it. we all want your mom we just want women to impregnate and chase freedom and get a bigger bloodline then ghensis khan. if u dont. your low test and your child will be deformed
 
  • +1
Reactions: hawk tuah
they are though lil bro, accept it. we all want your mom we just want women to impregnate and chase freedom and get a bigger bloodline then ghensis khan. if u dont. your low test and your child will be deformed
OP cant accept this
 
  • JFL
Reactions: JoChico
they are though lil bro, accept it. we all want your mom we just want women to impregnate and chase freedom and get a bigger bloodline then ghensis khan. if u dont. your low test and your child will be deformed
IMG_1872.jpeg
 
  • +1
Reactions: raleqtambrobret
Bro is thinking he is funny by sending this even though hes the one who thinks im weird for wanting to impregnate women even though he created this thread, disgusting human being time to cut your balls off and deep fry them
 
Is this another attempt to mask the fact that youre sobbing, by posting an opposite reaction?
BTW this is the most obvious alt ever @The Grinch this is probably one of your org friends trying to seek a fight with you cuz he always is good with you. Lets say I had an alt I would call my bhais @Gengar , @chudlite and @truthhurts dalits cuz normally the interactions are friendly if you get me
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar, chudlite, The Grinch and 1 other person
BTW this is the most obvious alt ever @The Grinch this is probably one of your org friends trying to seek a fight with you cuz he always is good with you. Lets say I had an alt I would call my bhais @Gengar , @chudlite and @truthhurts dalits cuz normally the interactions are friendly if you get me
You got me :soy:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: JohnBaza
  • JFL
Reactions: Nowiff.Belgrade and The Grinch
Bro is thinking he is funny by sending this even though hes the one who thinks im weird for wanting to impregnate women even though he created this thread, disgusting human being time to cut your balls off and deep fry them
Seethe until you burn, incel
 
this is probably one of your org friends trying to seek a fight with you cuz he always is good with you.
he wishes, instead he got bullied and owned in this thread
 
BTW this is the most obvious alt ever @The Grinch this is probably one of your org friends trying to seek a fight with you cuz he always is good with you. Lets say I had an alt I would call my bhais @Gengar , @chudlite and @truthhurts dalits cuz normally the interactions are friendly if you get me
whate the point od this
 
  • JFL
Reactions: JohnBaza
This forum is proof that if moids actually start to understand some looks theory they become narcy lookist bitches
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
8
Views
273
Gppy
Gppy
thorns
Replies
2
Views
45
Ruthless
Ruthless
yandex99
Replies
17
Views
1K
forevergymcelling
forevergymcelling
Vermilioncore
Replies
2
Views
100
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top