D
Deleted member 16677
aspie
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
- Posts
- 527
- Reputation
- 891
The funniest people, professional or not, are always male. Women just aren't funny. By contrast, the most serious and depressive preacher, poet types are also men. The great artists are all men, but the "Reading-is-for-faggots"-types are also mostly male. The great criminals are men, the great saints are men. "There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper." - Camille Paglia.
There are many men who are into tall women, but there aren't any women into short men. There are many men who are into fat women, but there aren't any women who are into men with short dicks. There are many men who are into dominant women, but there aren't any women who are into submissive men. (Only prostitutes, "findommes", etc. but they don't count.)
I remember reading about a study once that came to the conclusion that men would be MORE accepting of a "reversed" relationship with the female being the main breadwinner than women. Maybe the fact that sperm is cheap while eggs are expensive has caused this greater male variability. With only one men being able to impregnate a great many women, nature could afford to "experiment" with men, resulting in a greater variety. Some studies even suggest that men are both smarter and dumber than women, as the most intelligent as well as the most stupid people in regards to IQ are mostly male.
At least, men have more interesting opinions and vary more in their opinions. Women usually do not have interesting or weird political opinions. It's mostly just moderate mainstream stuff they get from Fox News or CNN, pick your poison. But it's rare to find a woman who actually has something interesting and out of the box to say about some cultural or political phenomenon.
So while men vary greatly both in their sexual as well as in their non-sexual preferences, women often feel like Nickelback songs: if you know one, you know them all: [http://archive.is/McJw4] This also ties into the incel question, btw: as women do not vary so much in personality and preference, their sexual liberation results in them competing for the same few men
There are many men who are into tall women, but there aren't any women into short men. There are many men who are into fat women, but there aren't any women who are into men with short dicks. There are many men who are into dominant women, but there aren't any women who are into submissive men. (Only prostitutes, "findommes", etc. but they don't count.)
I remember reading about a study once that came to the conclusion that men would be MORE accepting of a "reversed" relationship with the female being the main breadwinner than women. Maybe the fact that sperm is cheap while eggs are expensive has caused this greater male variability. With only one men being able to impregnate a great many women, nature could afford to "experiment" with men, resulting in a greater variety. Some studies even suggest that men are both smarter and dumber than women, as the most intelligent as well as the most stupid people in regards to IQ are mostly male.
At least, men have more interesting opinions and vary more in their opinions. Women usually do not have interesting or weird political opinions. It's mostly just moderate mainstream stuff they get from Fox News or CNN, pick your poison. But it's rare to find a woman who actually has something interesting and out of the box to say about some cultural or political phenomenon.
So while men vary greatly both in their sexual as well as in their non-sexual preferences, women often feel like Nickelback songs: if you know one, you know them all: [http://archive.is/McJw4] This also ties into the incel question, btw: as women do not vary so much in personality and preference, their sexual liberation results in them competing for the same few men
