seif1xz
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2025
- Posts
- 486
- Reputation
- 436
Women do not deserve rights and most of the time throughout history they never had the privilege or chance to choose their own partners. Humanity has always mostly been an intrasexual selection species, the kind of sexual selection where men directly compete with each other in order to secure the women they want. Looks didn’t matter in this scenario, since getting women in prehistoric times heavily depended on physical combat and the ability to outsmart other men in order to win. This is what shaped the evolution of humanity.
The opposite of this is intersexual selection, where women get to choose their own partners based on certain traits. This being widespread is a modern phenomenon. Women are retarded, soulless, and materialistic subhumans and whatever they find attractive should never matter.
Lets see what the studies say
1- There is no correlation between looks or facial masculinity and fighting success:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
2- There is no correlation between looks and health:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
3- There’s no correlation between looks and intelligence:
4- Beauty is a scientific mystery and cannot be easily predicted, while yes beauty itself is objective (meaning objectively any face with good facial harmony is attractive), what makes a certain face fall in the good harmony category and another face in the bad harmony category is completely random and remains unexplained scientifically. Physical beauty is influenced by many genes not just one or two, and the way those genes combine in children is just random. That’s why many attractive people have average looking parents, beauty often comes from rare genetic combinations that don’t reliably repeat. There’s also a concept called regression to the mean, which means extreme traits like high attractiveness usually shift back toward average in the next generation. Women hyperfixating on facial harmony/attractiveness is completely pointless.
“Beauty = genetic quality” is retarded irrational foid logic.
Women should never be in a position of power over men in a society and have control over which men get to reproduce and which men don’t. This only happens in gay gynocentric western societies where women have more rights than they should. In thirdworld countries especially islamic shitholes, society tends to be more androcentric. Men there have many other important things to worry about than “muh hypergamy”, because it literally just doesn’t exist there. Inceldom is only a problem in western countries because women control the dating market there.
The opposite of this is intersexual selection, where women get to choose their own partners based on certain traits. This being widespread is a modern phenomenon. Women are retarded, soulless, and materialistic subhumans and whatever they find attractive should never matter.
Lets see what the studies say
1- There is no correlation between looks or facial masculinity and fighting success:
A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans - PMC
Humans are sexually dimorphic: men and women differ in body build and composition, craniofacial structure, and voice pitch, likely mediated in part by developmental testosterone. Sexual selection hypotheses posit that, ancestrally, more ‘masculine’ ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
2- There is no correlation between looks and health:
Attractive and healthy-looking male faces do not show higher immunoreactivity - PMC
Previous research has indicated that facial attractiveness may provide cues to the functioning of the immune system. Mating with individuals who have a more effective immune system could lead to a higher reproductive success. Our main aim was to ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Physiological correlates of bilateral symmetry in humans - PubMed
Departures from perfect bilateral symmetry are thought to mirror an organism's ability to maintain developmental homeostasis. There is evidence showing that symmetry is negatively correlated with evolutionary and physical fitness. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
3- There’s no correlation between looks and intelligence:
4- Beauty is a scientific mystery and cannot be easily predicted, while yes beauty itself is objective (meaning objectively any face with good facial harmony is attractive), what makes a certain face fall in the good harmony category and another face in the bad harmony category is completely random and remains unexplained scientifically. Physical beauty is influenced by many genes not just one or two, and the way those genes combine in children is just random. That’s why many attractive people have average looking parents, beauty often comes from rare genetic combinations that don’t reliably repeat. There’s also a concept called regression to the mean, which means extreme traits like high attractiveness usually shift back toward average in the next generation. Women hyperfixating on facial harmony/attractiveness is completely pointless.
“Beauty = genetic quality” is retarded irrational foid logic.
Women should never be in a position of power over men in a society and have control over which men get to reproduce and which men don’t. This only happens in gay gynocentric western societies where women have more rights than they should. In thirdworld countries especially islamic shitholes, society tends to be more androcentric. Men there have many other important things to worry about than “muh hypergamy”, because it literally just doesn’t exist there. Inceldom is only a problem in western countries because women control the dating market there.
