Men with slightly longer legs are more attractive to women

Alexanderr

Alexanderr

Unavailable
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Posts
21,201
Reputation
41,810
 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄
“The researchers, who are psychologists at the University of Cambridge, recruited online 74 heterosexual female participants aged 20 to 69. Each woman was shown 28 images, one at a time, and was asked to rate attractiveness on a scale from 1 (not attractive) to 7 (very attractive). As shown in the left-hand figure below, all male images were the same height. The only difference in each set of figures was the leg-to-body ratio.

5AE8C702 F0B8 4408 B44F B7BBBEC1C19E


The center image in each set, marked "0", represents the average leg-to-body ratio. The numbers on each side represent the number of standard deviations away from the average each image represents. For instance, the image marked "-1" means that the male has a leg-to-body ratio that is one standard deviation below average.

When the researchers crunched the numbers and added a best-fit curve, they found that women preferred men with slightly longer legs than average. (See right-hand figure.) Specifically, the most attractive male has a leg-to-body ratio that is 0.5 standard deviations above average. Men with leg-to-body ratios that were too high or too low were rated as less attractive, with short-legged men being seen as the least attractive. These results were consistent across skin colors.

The data for silhouettes (bottom row) were different. Here, women preferred men with very slightly lower leg-to-body ratios than average. However, compared to the 3D-rendered images, silhouettes are not very realistic, which may explain this inconsistent result.

The authors note that a similar study conducted in Japan showed that women preferred men with average leg-to-body ratios, which suggests that the preference for slightly longer legs may be cultural. That's one big reason why evolutionary psychology studies must always be interpreted with caution.”

 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄
Link to the study:
Sci-Hub | The effect of leg-to-body ratio on male attractiveness depends on the ecological validity of the figures. Royal Society Open Science, 4(10), 170399 | 10.1098/rsos.170399

This is a fucking research article JFL
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: AscendingHero, Deleted member 13511, PrisonMike and 16 others
lifefuel, brb getting LL
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, Deleted member 5608, Jamal2222 and 1 other person
yeah same if for woman but you can always make an illusion with some clothes or just by losing bf%
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, Deleted member 6403 and Deleted member 11748
Long torso + broad shoulders > long legs
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: AscendingHero, Lolcel, Slayercel and 12 others
i'm pretty sure a larger upper body us more dimorphic tho?
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, Lolcel, Slayercel and 20 others
i think st close to a 1:1 ratio might be ideal for dimorphism and percieved fighting success?
 
Brutal LLpill
 
  • +1
  • WTF
  • JFL
Reactions: lepo2317, Deleted member 9787 and owlofathena
basically if youre tall you have this by default
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and datboijj
My legs are too long, looks uncanny ngl
 
Long legs are classy
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: AscendingHero, Lolcel, Danish_Retard and 16 others
Presumably a good biological marker. Longer legs mean longer stride length. Would have been valuable back when we were hunters trying to catch prey.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slayercel and Stevensmithgerard
 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄
The researchers, who are psychologists at the University of Cambridge, recruited online 74 heterosexual female participants aged 20 to 69. Each woman was shown 28 images, one at a time, and was asked to rate attractiveness on a scale from 1 (not attractive) to 7 (very attractive). As shown in the left-hand figure below, all male images were the same height. The only difference in each set of figures was the leg-to-body ratio.

View attachment 939439

The center image in each set, marked "0", represents the average leg-to-body ratio. The numbers on each side represent the number of standard deviations away from the average each image represents. For instance, the image marked "-1" means that the male has a leg-to-body ratio that is one standard deviation below average.

When the researchers crunched the numbers and added a best-fit curve, they found that women preferred men with slightly longer legs than average. (See right-hand figure.) Specifically, the most attractive male has a leg-to-body ratio that is 0.5 standard deviations above average. Men with leg-to-body ratios that were too high or too low were rated as less attractive, with short-legged men being seen as the least attractive. These results were consistent across skin colors.

The data for silhouettes (bottom row) were different. Here, women preferred men with very slightly lower leg-to-body ratios than average. However, compared to the 3D-rendered images, silhouettes are not very realistic, which may explain this inconsistent result.

The authors note that a similar study conducted in Japan showed that women preferred men with average leg-to-body ratios, which suggests that the preference for slightly longer legs may be cultural. That's one big reason why evolutionary psychology studies must always be interpreted with caution.

 ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄  ̄
Link to the study:
Sci-Hub | The effect of leg-to-body ratio on male attractiveness depends on the ecological validity of the figures. Royal Society Open Science, 4(10), 170399 | 10.1098/rsos.170399

And they debunked the BBC theory at the same time lolololol
 
Probably correlation not causation, long legs=Taller=better development
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: lepo2317, Deleted member 9344 and SubhumanCurrycel
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: RAITEIII and Looks234
lifefuel, already have legs longer than torso.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slayercel
1613580717521
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Slayercel
you can fraud your legs length with shoes.. lifefuel.
 
Dnr but i think they are assume if you have long legs also you have long dick, but there is no big corelation afaik. But it's logical heuristic for woman tbh.
 
Probably correlation not causation, long legs=Taller=better development
Did you even read the study? Or at the very least look a couple seconds at the picture from the study op provided?

Dnr but i think they are assume if you have long legs also you have long dick, but there is no big corelation afaik. But it's logical heuristic for woman tbh.
cope, it just way more aesthetic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slayercel and GigaAscender
Hunter gatherers were lean, with long legs/arms also.

Ergersgr
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
I WANT LONGER EVERYTHING
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Slayercel
Blacks have long legs all the time, chineses tend to have short ass legs.
 
Just lol @ anyone who says long legs are feminine
Broad shoulders , tall with longer legs is the most mogger body type
 

Similar threads

Seth Walsh
Replies
16
Views
820
Seth Walsh
Seth Walsh
Acne Victim
Replies
7
Views
219
Deleted member 84615
D
can’t relate
Replies
48
Views
1K
Klasik616
Klasik616

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top