Mensa iq test(how smart are you)

[Aypo129]

Solving Irodov is the actual test of iq

 

[Crusile]

IQ gives you the ability to change your life trajectory if youre subhuman. would you rather be low iq or high iq chad? its not meaningless if it helps you achieve your goals and rise out of poverty or become a billionare.

it has a .4 correlation with life success and it is shown that people with higher levels of iq are more happy.

Iq doesnt give you anything, IQ is a result of obtaining knowledge, it doesn't cause anything unless you can prove g to be real or causal.

 

[Deleted member 27511]

"I have a 130+ iq, but iq tests are bs anyway"

typing any variance of this online is the biggest retard giveaway there is (after taking online or any iq tests voluntarily)

this is too transparent and pathetic to even qualify as humblebragging, lmao

O

"I have a 130+ iq, but iq tests are bs anyway"

typing any variance of this online is the biggest retard giveaway there is (after taking online or any iq tests voluntarily)

this is too transparent and pathetic to even qualify as humblebragging, lmao

only the online tests are proctored iq tests are legit. Lol keep coping you low iq animal can’t even read. This iq test is bullshit it’s just fun if you have free time. If I were high iq I wouldn’t be on this forum

 

[Deleted member 27511]

View attachment 2217117
My result from the Mensa Denmark exam. 85th percentile, not too shabby. Had like 15 minutes extra time after finishing the last question.

Nice

 

[Deleted member 24712]

Yeah nigga you dumb

 

[HerpDerpson]

I'm afraid to take it.

 

[forevermirin]

shits ez tbh

 

[Deleted member 27511]

shits ez tbh
View attachment 2217202

Insane if unfrauded, why are you even own here to become a billionaire lmao

 

[Deleted member 27511]

shits ez tbh
View attachment 2217202

Mogs me

 

[forevermirin]

Insane if unfrauded, why are you even own here to become a billionaire lmao

its partly the reason im on here tbh. but also i dont think 158 is accurate since ive taken plenty similar tests since i was a kid and once u get the hang of it, it isn't really hard there's maybe 2-3 questions that are tricky the rest take seconds.

most successful people irl are in the 110-125 range i think. at genius levels u need to have a passion for something intricate like math or cs or even chess for u to be actually able to utilize it but i pulled out of the nerd lifestyle as soon as i hit college.

 

[forevermirin]

Mogs me

ive scored in the 130s in online tests before usually because i ran out of time being stuck on a question. have u tested officially and do people irl think you're a genius?

 

[Deleted member 27511]

ive scored in the 130s in online tests before usually because i ran out of time being stuck on a question. have u tested officially and do people irl think you're a genius?

People irl think I’m smart, I’ve never tested officially and never will since you have to pay. No way in hell am I paying to take an iq test. But if there were an option to do a free official one I’d be willing to sit down for a while on a day where I’m not busy.

 

[Deleted member 26116]

not really, you dont have any counterarguments. most people are not subhuman enough to the point where they wont have friends or a gf. youre strawmanning the argument.

Missed the point entirely. Keep coping with IQ, subhumans.

 

[BigBoy]

Iq doesnt give you anything, IQ is a result of obtaining knowledge, it doesn't cause anything unless you can prove g to be real or causal.

you dont need to know anything to take a take an iq test

Missed the point entirely. Keep coping with IQ, subhumans.

the argument is whether iq matters, youre answering the question of whether looks or iq is more important. 2 completely different discussions. you failed to answer the question of whether you would be high iq chad or low iq chad because you know being high iq chad mogs.

 

[Crusile]

you dont need to know anything to take a take an iq test

the argument is whether iq matters, youre answering the question of whether looks or iq is more important. 2 completely different discussions. you failed to answer the question of whether you would be high iq chad or low iq chad because you know being high iq chad mogs.

you dont need knowledge to answer IQ test questions? or you dont need to know the truth about g-factor?

IQ doesnt matter because g is a false variable that doesn't exist in the brain. Sure, having more obtained knowledge is better than having less knowledge, but no one "has" IQ

 

[Crusile]

Having IQ means having the proxy general knowledge that is tested on IQ tests, nothing more

 

[BigBoy]

you dont need knowledge to answer IQ test questions? or you dont need to know the truth about g-factor?

IQ doesnt matter because g is a false variable that doesn't exist in the brain. Sure, having more obtained knowledge is better than having less knowledge, but no one "has" IQ

only basic english and math is needed for an iq test. so nothing past toddler level.

IQ and the g factor are constructions by humans to measure general intelligence. they exist but what we're talking about are things humans came up to measure cognitive ability

Having IQ means having the proxy general knowledge that is tested on IQ tests, nothing more

IQ tests measure your ability to solve problems and recognize patterns. there is no general knowledge tested in IQ tests

 

[Crusile]

only basic english and math is needed for an iq test. so nothing past toddler level.

IQ and the g factor are constructions by humans to measure general intelligence. they exist but what we're talking about are things humans came up to measure cognitive ability

IQ tests measure your ability to solve problems and recognize patterns. there is no general knowledge tested in IQ tests

What about the knowledge required to answer IQ test questions, correctly? Does that knowledge randomly spawn in your mind?

The Myth of “General Intelligence”

5000 words Introduction “General Intelligence” or g is championed as the hallmark “discovery” of psychology. First “discovered” by Charles Spearman in 1904, noti…

notpoliticallycorrect.me

IQ tests measures social class and obtained knowledge using random proxy knowledge (g-factors) that repeat the same knowledge in multiple subtests to appear more legitimate.

If general intelligence doesn't exist in the brain, gene SNPs, and can't be measured, then the cause of the epic g correlations can't be determined. It is just correlations with no known cause.

<em>g</em>, a Statistical Myth

g is a false variable

 

[Crusile]

IQ tests don't measure cognitive ability, it poorly estimates general knowledge to estimate social class

 

[Crusile]

Recognizing patterns, basic logic, written question following ability, vocabulary, general knowledge, spatial mental manipulation, are all obtained knowledge which g doesn't cause you to obtain. It could be something else that can't be measured, but it's not g

 

[Deleted member 30606]

g is a false variable with confounding associations, it's predictive power is misleading because IQ scores are a result of something (not g), not a cause

Since g-factor doesn't exist in the brain and thus can't cause anything, g doesn't exist. You are the believer in this fake made up variable -_-

IQ tests are arbitrary knowledge tests of random knowledge used as a proxy for knowledge seeking behavior lmfao keep believing in your falsevariable

Yeah but there are some people who learn quickly in school, some who can barely interpret instructions. How do you account for that?

 

[Crusile]

@fandrewpandu https://www.jstor.org/stable/23469390 IQ can't predict learning speed.

It could be differences in previously obtained knowledge or variance in cognative ability (which can't be measured)

 

[Deleted member 30606]

@fandrewpandu https://www.jstor.org/stable/23469390 IQ can't predict learning speed.

It could be differences in previously obtained knowledge or variance in cognative ability (which can't be measured)

Pretty sure there are loads of things which correlate with iq.. A general factor of good genes, suggesting there is merit to the argument.
e.g. if someone has good bone structure they're more likely to be intelligent.. loads of other things.

 

[Crusile]

Pretty sure there are loads of things which correlate with iq.. A general factor of good genes, suggesting there is merit to the argument.
e.g. if someone has good bone structure they're more likely to be intelligent.. loads of other things.

IQ is a proxy estimate of obtained knowledge, IQ measures knowledge seeking behavior and IQ knowledge exposure. What correlations are you talking about?

 

[Deleted member 30606]

IQ is a proxy estimate of obtained knowledge, IQ measures knowledge seeking behavior and IQ knowledge exposure. What correlations are you talking about?

Physiological correlations https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/016028969290010O

 

[Deleted member 30606]

IQ is a proxy estimate of obtained knowledge, IQ measures knowledge seeking behavior and IQ knowledge exposure. What correlations are you talking about?

but tbh now that I try and look for evidence I find it hard

 

[mogger123]

Physiological correlations https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/016028969290010O

No way! Being fast predicts you are better at taking tests in a timed environment. Next we will show being taller predicts you are better at basketball

 

[Deleted member 30606]

No way! Being fast predicts you are better at taking tests in a timed environment. Next we will show being taller predicts you are better at basketball

It suggests the nerves are different/better.

 

[Deleted member 30606]

It suggests the nerves are different/better.

No way! Being fast predicts you are better at taking tests in a timed environment. Next we will show being taller predicts you are better at basketball

having fast reaction times in a test wont mean shit. It saves you 0.1s per pen stroke. Is that the point you're trying to make? It suggests that there is an underlying difference, like having fibre internet instead of copper.

 

[mogger123]

It suggests the nerves are different/better.

Which suggests nothing about intelligence, only that under timed conditions you will be perform better

 

[Deleted member 23239]

Which suggests nothing about intelligence, only that under timed conditions you will be perform better

it suggest how you would survive in prison , femboy

 

[mogger123]

having fast reaction times in a test wont mean shit. It saves you 0.1s per pen stroke. Is that the point you're trying to make? It suggests that there is an underlying difference, like having fibre internet instead of copper.

Natural tendency to work faster which is largely environmental

+ Why does speed matter at all? Surely intelligence is about who can solve the most difficult problems, not who can solve easy problems under time pressure

 

[Deleted member 30606]

okay you are technically correct but its not practical

 

[Deleted member 30606]

Natural tendency to work faster which is largely environmental

+ Why does speed matter at all? Surely intelligence is about who can solve the most difficult problems, not who can solve easy problems under time pressure

But surely there is a correlation between speed + that study I linked wasn't even showing how more intelligence = 'work faster' it was about pure reaction times...

 

[mogger123]

But surely there is a correlation between speed + that study I linked wasn't even showing how more intelligence = 'work faster' it was about pure reaction times...

Not necessarily

Reaction time can be trained and has a significantly environmental component. If someone likes doing things fast they will develop better reaction speeds over time and are less likely to run out of time on a test with a time limit

 

[Deleted member 30606]

Natural tendency to work faster which is largely environmental

+ Why does speed matter at all? Surely intelligence is about who can solve the most difficult problems, not who can solve easy problems under time pressure

And I agree with that last point to an extent but you must recognize, people who can solve hard problems will be able to do the easy ones faster..

 

[Deleted member 30606]

Not necessarily

Reaction time can be trained and has a significantly environmental component. If someone likes doing things fast they will develop better reaction speeds over time and are less likely to run out of time on a test with a time limit

I'm talking about reaction speeds as in hitting a baseball or playing an fps, not reacting to a novel question. I would think those are two different concepts entirely. although what studies show is that there is a corellation between these things, suggesting a trend in physiologies?

 

[mogger123]

And I agree with that last point to an extent but you must recognize, people who can solve hard problems will be able to do the easy ones faster..

Probably. But probably doesn't make a good measure. I don't measure something with a ruler and go "this is probably longer than 20cm but I really have no idea what length it is"

 

[mogger123]

I'm talking about reaction speeds as in hitting a baseball or playing an fps, not reacting to a novel question. I would think those are two different concepts entirely. although what studies show is that there is a corellation between these things, suggesting a trend in physiologies?

Do you not think you would get better at reacting to hitting a baseball or playing an FPS with practice?

 

[Deleted member 30606]

Do you not think you would get better at reacting to hitting a baseball or playing an FPS with practice?

I do

 

[Deleted member 30606]

Do you not think you would get better at reacting to hitting a baseball or playing an FPS with practice?

so you know that general cognitive practise like reading will give you a strengthened peripheral nervous system overall thereby resulting in faster reaction times and higher IQ?

 

[Deleted member 30606]

so you know that general cognitive practise like reading will give you a strengthened peripheral nervous system overall thereby resulting in faster reaction times and higher IQ?

or knowledge seeking behaviour or whatever?

 

[mogger123]

so you know that general cognitive practise like reading will give you a strengthened peripheral nervous system overall thereby resulting in faster reaction times and higher IQ?

I think iq is all pseudoscientific nonsense perpetuated by autists who aren't smart enough to study anything meaningful

 

[Deleted member 30606]

I think iq is all pseudoscientific nonsense perpetuated by autists who aren't smart enough to study anything meaningful

so you know that general cognitive practise like reading will give you a strengthened peripheral nervous system overall thereby resulting in faster reaction times and higher IQ?

So you agree with what I just wrote.. could you prove that in any way? seems to be your opinion at this point

 

[Deleted member 30606]

I think iq is all pseudoscientific nonsense perpetuated by autists who aren't smart enough to study anything meaningful

this is even contradictory to what you have been saying all along 'smart enough to study anything meaningful, suggesting you need a special essence, lets call it g factor for sake of arguement to know how to study the right stuff...

 

[Deleted member 30606]

this is even contradictory to what you have been saying all along 'smart enough to study anything meaningful, suggesting you need a special essence, lets call it g factor for sake of arguement to know how to study the right stuff...

which I agree with, just in a way that disagrees with you.. somehow..

 

[Deleted member 30606]

which I agree with, just in a way that disagrees with you.. somehow..

based on superstition i can only presume

 

[Deleted member 30606]

Probably. But probably doesn't make a good measure. I don't measure something with a ruler and go "this is probably longer than 20cm but I really have no idea what length it is"

Bad arguement… wasting my time

 

[Deleted member 30606]

Probably. But probably doesn't make a good measure. I don't measure something with a ruler and go "this is probably longer than 20cm but I really have no idea what length it is"

Semantics here

 

[Deleted member 30606]

Recognizing patterns, basic logic, written question following ability, vocabulary, general knowledge, spatial mental manipulation, are all obtained knowledge which g doesn't cause you to obtain. It could be something else that can't be measured, but it's not g

Exactly you can’t measure g. Only it’s correlates. I agree it’s definition is nebulous. But you could say what makes a Russian jet worse or better than an American jet at dogfighting. Is it more likely a jet with a higher speed/acceleration is a better fighter or turn time, climb rate, weaponry e..t.c but when all of these factors compounded If they were to go to war you would have one jet better than the other. This is an metaphor of G factor.