Message from Bearboy

Gaygymmaxx

Gaygymmaxx

The Poet.
Joined
Mar 7, 2022
Posts
40,786
Reputation
55,567
1658455023328


@FreakkForLife
@Predeterminism
@Thompsonz
@FailedNormieManlet
@the BULL
@Vermilioncore
@Xangsane
@Lihito
@Growth Plate
@Rupert Pupkin
@8PSLcel
@PrinterAndFaxMachin
@alriodai
@RecessedChinCel
@Nameless_Sunflower
@gamma
@smvmaxxertilllate
@....
@TeenAscender
@RoBobaFett999
@RabidRosaries

@Alexanderr
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: currylightskin, Deleted member 13332, Deleted member 1901 and 2 others
"
The thread wasnt fully going about rape and yes i agree the title was a bit dumb. But to say with "fuck" i was "obviously" talking about rape is a bit ignorant and selfish, because thats what you think or believe and not whats true.

It does not put any emphasis on rape, fucking yes but not Rape. There was no necrophilia in the thread either. Where did i talk about fucking the dead body? The thread was clearly a joke and i even showed gifs on it from the series Supernatural. Anyone who isnt a complete autist would have understood it.

What happened to org? we cant joke anymore like before? or is it just me that you dislike because your friends bitch about me and want me rid all the time. In the past i did make mistakes but this time it was clear the thread was just a joke, how was the thread not a joke i put supernatural gifs to it. "I've seen lots of posts about other user's being cucks during my time here but this one didn't have an inkling of humor attached to it" This is your opinion, what you think not a fact. Others found it to have humor and even joked in the thread. I do agree my homie went a bit too far with necrophilia and shit but we all do dumb shit.

"
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Elvisandreaa, Deleted member 15827, currylightskin and 1 other person
What happened
 
Women love to be raped. Women of all ages from 1 to 100
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Hueless, Deleted member 15827, currylightskin and 7 others
How is assuming the thread is talking about rape selfish or ignorant at all?

The thread is quite literally titled ''imagine raping a users mother on here''. Now, I know fuck isn't exclusively synonymous with rape but rape is synonymous with fuck because it involves sexual intercourse/penetration.

The thread also contains necrophilia.
''I LOOVEE GRANNY PUSSY :love:

When we fuck her hard enough she'll probably die right there :love:

THEN WE FUCK HER AGAIN !!!!! :love:

NECRO PHILIA IS THE BEEEESSSTT!!!!'' -@zv1212

To which he replies:
''Thats right after the bitch collapses on the ground from all the hard fucking we gave to her, we will fuck her again and again.''

The thread wasn't the usual tongue-in-cheek PSL joke you see around here often. I am all for allowing users to speak their minds and compared to 99% of the internet, we do allow a lot more.

Nevertheless, there needs to be some regulation for it to be worthwhile. Had we let users go out and about and say everything that came to mind, we would've been shut down a long time ago.

Lastly, of course, it's my opinion. Humor in itself is inherently subjective. There is no divine verdict marking something as innately humorous or not. So, it's up to us (in this case me) to come to a decision.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14693, Hueless, Deleted member 15827 and 5 others
What happened
@Alexanderr banned him and warned me for making fucked up rape jokes

he claims it was not a joke and we were seriously plotting to rape and murder his mother. soy shit innit
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Stopping@Nothing19
How is assuming the thread is talking about rape selfish or ignorant at all?

The thread is quite literally titled ''imagine raping a users mother on here''. Now, I know fuck isn't exclusively synonymous with rape but rape is synonymous with fuck because it involves sexual intercourse/penetration.

The thread also contains necrophilia.


To which he replies:


The thread wasn't the usual tongue-in-cheek PSL joke you see around here often. I am all for allowing users to speak their minds and compared to 99% of the internet, we do allow a lot more.

Nevertheless, there needs to be some regulation for it to be worthwhile. Had we let users go out and about and say everything that came to mind, we would've been shut down a long time ago.

Lastly, of course, it's my opinion. Humor in itself is inherently subjective. There is no divine verdict marking something as innately humorous or not. So, it's up to us (in this case me) to come to a decision.
Good take. Can I get contributor color for my LOPD thread? @GetShrekt thinks so too
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14693 and Stopping@Nothing19
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
How is assuming the thread is talking about rape selfish or ignorant at all?

The thread is quite literally titled ''imagine raping a users mother on here''. Now, I know fuck isn't exclusively synonymous with rape but rape is synonymous with fuck because it involves sexual intercourse/penetration.

The thread also contains necrophilia.


To which he replies:


The thread wasn't the usual tongue-in-cheek PSL joke you see around here often. I am all for allowing users to speak their minds and compared to 99% of the internet, we do allow a lot more.

Nevertheless, there needs to be some regulation for it to be worthwhile. Had we let users go out and about and say everything that came to mind, we would've been shut down a long time ago.

Lastly, of course, it's my opinion. Humor in itself is inherently subjective. There is no divine verdict marking something as innately humorous or not. So, it's up to us (in this case me) to come to a decision.
caging at this shit :lul:


"Humor in itself is inherently subjective."

yeah it is, you dont have to find it funny but to claim we are serious about raping and murdering his mother is clearly bullshit.

you mean to tell me you genuinely think that me and @BearBoy are planning and would like to rape and murder his mother? you think we actually want that?

you dont need to find it funny. you dont ban users jokes based on how funny they are
 
How is assuming the thread is talking about rape selfish or ignorant at all?

The thread is quite literally titled ''imagine raping a users mother on here''. Now, I know fuck isn't exclusively synonymous with rape but rape is synonymous with fuck because it involves sexual intercourse/penetration.

The thread also contains necrophilia.


To which he replies:


The thread wasn't the usual tongue-in-cheek PSL joke you see around here often. I am all for allowing users to speak their minds and compared to 99% of the internet, we do allow a lot more.

Nevertheless, there needs to be some regulation for it to be worthwhile. Had we let users go out and about and say everything that came to mind, we would've been shut down a long time ago.

Lastly, of course, it's my opinion. Humor in itself is inherently subjective. There is no divine verdict marking something as innately humorous or not. So, it's up to us (in this case me) to come to a decision.
so you are just gonna ban any reference to fucked up rape or murder jokes depending entirely on if its "funny" from this point on?

I report users for doxxing and leaking dms and have not once had one of my reports accepting

but when a user you dont like makes a rape joke its game over? bullshit
 
  • +1
Reactions: RecessedChinCel
How is assuming the thread is talking about rape selfish or ignorant at all?

The thread is quite literally titled ''imagine raping a users mother on here''. Now, I know fuck isn't exclusively synonymous with rape but rape is synonymous with fuck because it involves sexual intercourse/penetration.

The thread also contains necrophilia.


To which he replies:


The thread wasn't the usual tongue-in-cheek PSL joke you see around here often. I am all for allowing users to speak their minds and compared to 99% of the internet, we do allow a lot more.

Nevertheless, there needs to be some regulation for it to be worthwhile. Had we let users go out and about and say everything that came to mind, we would've been shut down a long time ago.

Lastly, of course, it's my opinion. Humor in itself is inherently subjective. There is no divine verdict marking something as innately humorous or not. So, it's up to us (in this case me) to come to a decision.
Low T modcel tbh.
soy shit innit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
any good PSL forums?

its migration season innit
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14693 and Stopping@Nothing19
Why was the thread about kidnapping Chico deleted? I wanted to read it the other day :feelsbadman:
Cuz no point anymore hes post prime. Might as well kidnap you, you are higher psl than this 4 psl descended oldcel. Such is life, such is timepill
 
@Alexanderr will you ban me if i make my title "Resident Forum Rapist" in memory of @BearBoy ??
 
so you are just gonna ban any reference to fucked up rape or murder jokes depending entirely on if its "funny" from this point on?
Don't be obstinate, the thread wasn't simply referring to rape or a tongue-in-cheek joke about rape. It was morbidly describing, hell, even stirring up others to commit the act of rape. You mass-tagged users about ''joining in on the fun'' to which @BearBoy agreed.
Also, of course, it has to be funny at a base level, otherwise, it wouldn't be much of a joke now, would it? After all, that's what you have been claiming it to be.
I report users for doxxing and leaking dms and have not once had one of my reports accepting

but when a user you dont like makes a rape joke its game over? bullshit
Because it was ridiculous, you reported someone for taking a screenshot of you telling them they should delete their accounts and kill themselves? If you want to be pedantic about it, technically, harassing other users is against the rules as well but here we are.
 
@PapiMew
@Gargantuan
@Lorsss
@Chad1212
@Kingkellz
@AscendingHero

From now on can we expect a ban from any rape or murder jokes if they are deemed "unfunny" ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lorsss
Don't be obstinate, the thread wasn't simply referring to rape or a tongue-in-cheek joke about rape. It was morbidly describing, hell, even stirring up others to commit the act of rape. You mass-tagged users about ''joining in on the fun'' to which @BearBoy agreed.
morbidly describing it makes it funnier :feelshah:
Also, of course, it has to be funny at a base level, otherwise, it wouldn't be much of a joke now, would it? After all, that's what you have been claiming it to be.
so it really is just based on if you think its funny? youll ban our rape jokes if they arent funny? jesus
Because it was ridiculous, you reported someone for taking a screenshot of you telling them they should delete their accounts and kill themselves? If you want to be pedantic about it, technically, harassing other users is against the rules as well but here we are.
it had nothing to do with me. nobody said that to me it was some other beef i just reported it because it was soy,
 
morbidly describing it makes it funnier :feelshah:

so it really is just based on if you think its funny? youll ban our rape jokes if they arent funny? jesus
You are trying to make yourself appear as the victim for not openly being able to say whatever you want in regards to rape. Which is worrying.
Look, what I am trying to say is that you're free to make dark-humored posts... But if in cases like this one, where you get warned, they're obviously not ''jokes'' and won't be treated as such.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ChristianChad
  • JFL
Reactions: Vermilioncore and smvmaxxertilllate
Free bro fuck jewish moderation team
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: stevielake, Stopping@Nothing19 and Gaygymmaxx
You are trying to make yourself appear as the victim for not openly being able to say whatever you want in regards to rape. Which is worrying.
Look, what I am trying to say is that you're free to make dark-humored posts... But if in cases like this one, where you get warned, they're obviously not ''jokes'' and won't be treated as such.
if you believe i genuinely had intentions to rape his mother, incapacitate @Enfant terrible and jerk him off while we murder his mother in front of him then kill him and continue raping his mother then say it.

say "i believe you were going to or would be willing to do the things you said in that post"

stop pretending it wasnt a joke
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14693
if you believe i genuinely had intentions to rape his mother, incapacitate @Enfant terrible and jerk him off while we murder his mother in front of him then kill him and continue raping his mother then say it.

say "i believe you were going to or would be willing to do the things you said in that post"

stop pretending it wasnt a joke
You don't even necessarily need to, the fact you incited others to in some manner is enough. Though with users like you it's hard to tell.
 
You don't even necessarily need to, the fact you incited others to in some manner is enough. Though with users like you it's hard to tell.
ok no point in arguing anymore. just one last thing

can i make my title: "Resident Forum Rapist" ?
 
Time to pour one out for our fallen soldier

 
low T if you dont want to fuck a granny
 
@Alexanderr can't the idea of raping other users' mothers be considered some sort of acceptable PSL dark humor, instead of illegal activity?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15827
@Alexanderr can't the idea of raping other users' mothers be considered some sort of acceptable PSL dark humor, instead of illegal activity?
It wasn’t merely the idea if you read trough the thread they were inciting it as well, which is against the rules.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Lorsss and Erik-Jón
It wasn’t merely the idea if you read trough the thread they were inciting it as well, which is against the rules.
@Alexanderr can't the idea of raping other users' mothers be considered some sort of acceptable PSL dark humor, instead of illegal activity?
he knows its a joke but it was a personal vendetta against bearboy

dont bother
 
he knows its a joke but it was a personal vendetta against bearboy

dont bother
I know we’ve gone over it but you haven’t told me where you’d draw the line between something blatantly inciting others to illegal action and it merely being a PSL joke.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Hueless
I know we’ve gone over it but told you haven’t told me where you’d draw the line between something blatantly inciting others to illegal action and it merely being a PSL joke.
did i give out that niggas address?
did i dox or give any indication that i have the ability to do the things i said?

you know it was joke
 
did i give out that niggas address?
did i dox or give any indication that i have the ability to do the things i said?

you know it was joke
That's not what incite means. You're skirting around the issue. Are we supposed to only start taking action once we see you geared up, machete in hand, and driving to his place?
 
That's not what incite means. You're skirting around the issue. Are we supposed to only start taking action once we see you geared up, machete in hand, and driving to his place?
Answer yes or no.

do you believe i had plans to go to his house, rape and murder his mother, then kill him? If there is no way of drawing the line then you have to ban all rape jokes as i said before.
 
Answer yes or no.
Why would I? You didn’t even answer my original question and instead asked me one.
If there is no way of drawing the line then you have to ban all rape jokes as i said before.
Who said there is no way of drawing the line? I just did, which is why you and @BearBoy got warned.
 
Why would I? You didn’t even answer my original question and instead asked me one.

Who said there is no way of drawing the line? I just did, which is why you and @BearBoy got warned.
1658690169622
 
Why would I? You didn’t even answer my original question and instead asked me one.

Who said there is no way of drawing the line? I just did, which is why you and @BearBoy got warned.
Inciting would be something like Making threads about sending devansh mom porn or deepfaking devansh mom in porn and sending it to her mutuals etc. Joking about it , or even making it seem like inciting it doesn't count as actually inciting it imo. People here were actually inciting the devansh thing here and none of them got banned. How does joking about raping another users mom incite anything? It's like saying wear short skirts incites rape in a busy suburban street.
 
  • +1
Reactions: currylightskin
Inciting would be something like Making threads about sending devansh mom porn or deepfaking devansh mom in porn and sending it to her mutuals etc. Joking about it , or even making it seem like inciting it doesn't count as actually inciting it imo. People here were actually inciting the devansh thing here and none of them got banned. How does joking about raping another users mom incite anything? It's like saying wear short skirts incites rape in a busy suburban street.
I don’t think you read through the thread or actually know what incite means.
It means to encourage or stir up something.
CANT WAIT TO FUCK YOUR MOTHER WHEN SHE DIES @
Enfant terrible
@Enfant terrible

any of my boys want to join in on the fun??

Spoiler: WHO WANTS GRANNY PUSSY???
After which follows a tag of about 20 users and @BearBoy happily agreeing. Now, I don't know about you but I would consider this inciting. Inciting others to rape.
You can argue it was said in jest but that can be notoriously hard to differentiate through text on forums like this. This is why the rules section goes the extra mile to state, "in doubt don't post".
  • Do not post illegal content or incite anyone to commit illegal acts of any kind. If in doubt, don't post.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx and Deleted member 15827
I don’t think you read through the thread or actually know what incite means.
It means to encourage or stir up something.

After which follows a tag of about 20 users and @BearBoy happily agreeing. Now, I don't know about you but I would consider this inciting. Inciting others to rape.
You can argue it was said in jest but that can be notoriously hard to differentiate through text on forums like this. This is why the rules section goes the extra mile to state, "in doubt don't post".
I know but I doubt he incites any practical action with his post. Inciting would mean something like a page of erotic literature on raping his mom. Saying he'd love to rape with a few emojis doesn't give anyone even a half chub ,this forum is too low T for that lol. Now I would count what happened to Dev as actual inciting because the end result is only a step away while @BearBoy does not actually incite anything unless he shares the users address or something like that. It may still be in bad taste and unfunny but a perma ban is overkill imo.
 
I know but I doubt he incites any practical action with his post. Inciting would mean something like a page of erotic literature on raping his mom. Saying he'd love to rape with a few emojis doesn't give anyone even a half chub ,this forum is too low T for that lol. Now I would count what happened to Dev as actual inciting because the end result is only a step away while @BearBoy does not actually incite anything unless he shares the users address or something like that. It may still be in bad taste and unfunny but a perma ban is overkill imo.
i did kinda write a page of erotic literature tbh

did you not see the post :feelskek:

but yeah it was clearly a joke and i cant incite violence without giving any means of actually performing said violence
 
I know but I doubt he incites any practical action with his post. Inciting would mean something like a page of erotic literature on raping his mom.
As he said, they did sorta write that.
Fair, he didn’t invite them with a detailed list of actions to take. Nevertheless, prior to that quote, they had made various posts on how they’d go about rape and how it’d feel.
Now I would count what happened to Dev as actual inciting because the end result is only a step away while @BearBoy does not actually incite anything unless he shares the users address or something like that. It may still be in bad taste and unfunny but a perma ban is overkill imo.
I did actually warn & ban users involved with that situation and prohibited them from doing so again.

You do not need to give detailed and practical information for it to be considered inciting. The criteria you mention are completely arbitrary.
If instead, you go by its definition, the post can unquestionably be considered inciting.

Lastly, the reason @BearBoy got a permanent ban and @zv1212 did not is that just a few weeks prior he had gotten permanently banned for the exact same reason.
 
Don't be obstinate, the thread wasn't simply referring to rape or a tongue-in-cheek joke about rape. It was morbidly describing, hell, even stirring up others to commit the act of rape. You mass-tagged users about ''joining in on the fun'' to which @BearBoy agreed.
Also, of course, it has to be funny at a base level, otherwise, it wouldn't be much of a joke now, would it? After all, that's what you have been claiming it to be.

Because it was ridiculous, you reported someone for taking a screenshot of you telling them they should delete their accounts and kill themselves? If you want to be pedantic about it, technically, harassing other users is against the rules as well but here we are.
mirin your english skills
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 15827, Corleone and Alexanderr
As he said, they did sorta write that.
Fair, he didn’t invite them with a detailed list of actions to take. Nevertheless, prior to that quote, they had made various posts on how they’d go about rape and how it’d feel.

I did actually warn & ban users involved with that situation and prohibited them from doing so again.

You do not need to give detailed and practical information for it to be considered inciting. The criteria you mention are completely arbitrary.
If instead, you go by its definition, the post can unquestionably be considered inciting.

Lastly, the reason @BearBoy got a permanent ban and @zv1212 did not is that just a few weeks prior he had gotten permanently banned for the exact same reason.
Screenshot 2022 07 25 08 27 38 519 comandroidchrome


Now you can argue he did not stir up unlawful behaviour ( in this case rape) but he did encourage it. However I'd argue that the latter is so common in the forum that singling out one guy is unfair.

"The criteria you mention are completely arbitrary.
"

If the criteria for the definition was arbitrary and up to interpretation wouldn't a temporary ban be more reasonable. People get banned in soccer if they commit a serious enough foul but it also depends on the intent of the fouler. It's almost never a permanent ban
 

Similar threads

R
Replies
1
Views
192
2d v2
2d v2
moreroidsmoredates
Replies
73
Views
1K
IAMNOTANINCEL
IAMNOTANINCEL
Gaygymmaxx
Replies
10
Views
590
Mr. President
Mr. President
Gaygymmaxx
Replies
15
Views
388
Mr. President
Mr. President
K
Discussion Members
Replies
1
Views
197
Deleted member 61703
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top