[META] Only a small subgroup of this forum gets really into aesthetic theories

[Akhi]

Bit of a water thread but still

It feels like most people here are just schizo- or shitposting, they dont really get into the details of ratios and all that autistic looks shit

why is that the case? is it because theyve already given up and knowing about ratios will make them rope? or are they just not interested enough and use this site as social media?

thoughts?

 

[radicalrationalist]

because we spent a decade discussing that on the old forums and it's been done to death and boring

also, most ugly people have ugly brains that cannot appreciate beauty. asking them about what good ratios are might as well be asking random niggers on the street about quantum mechanics

 

[Mainstream]

I genuinely sharpen my eyes every day and started recognising good Ypsilar-Alar-angle to Frontal-Jaw angle harmonies instantly.

But to really get into the meat, one has to read primary sources, such as studies. Parroting the existing ideal ratios won't bring you far.

 

[Akhi]

because we spent a decade discussing that on the old forums and it's been done to death and boring

makes sense, but there are users who've been here for many years but still dont know anything about it, its just weird considering what this site is about

also, most ugly people have ugly brains that cannot appreciate beauty. asking them about what good ratios are might as well be asking random niggers on the street about quantum mechanics

that doesnt really make sense as the ratios arent arbitrary and the ideal is the ideal, no matter your subjective opinion

 

[Akhi]

I genuinely sharpen my eyes every day and started recognising good Ypsilar-Alar-angle to Frontal-Jaw angle harmonies instantly.

cant talk to someone without analyzing ratios its so over

prob is ill never forget this

 

[BrahminBoss]

I have so many theories but who will listen? Ill get a dnrd or cope , and maybe 4 jfls so I dont bother. This forum is primarily just incels barking and sfcels who werent smart enough for stormfront site

 

[Akhi]

I have so many theories but who will listen? Ill get a dnrd or cope , and maybe 4 jfls so I dont bother. This forum is primarily just incels barking and sfcels who werent smart enough for stormfront site

very true

most unironically racist people are just stupid as fuck

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Because softmaxxing is what appeals to most users, and softmaxxing won't change your ratios, not that many people will care.

Obsessing over structural perfection isn't going to benefit very many people.

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

I have so many theories but who will listen? Ill get a dnrd or cope , and maybe 4 jfls so I dont bother. This forum is primarily just incels barking and sfcels who werent smart enough for stormfront site

I have seen you become a very high iq looksmax theorist, I noticed bossman, don't worry.

 

[Akhi]

Because softmaxxing is what appeals to most users, and softmaxxing won't change your ratios, not that many people will care.

Obsessing over structural perfection isn't going to benefit very many people.

i agree that its kinda senseless

 

[Deleted member 19968]

I genuinely sharpen my eyes every day and started recognising good Ypsilar-Alar-angle to Frontal-Jaw angle harmonies instantly.

But to really get into the meat, one has to read primary sources, such as studies. Parroting the existing ideal ratios won't bring you far.

Same, i dont have to measure most of em tbh. Ipsilateral angle is low importance tho

 

[Deleted member 50702]

I have insane looks knowledge, I can't leak it though it'd change the world

 

[Deleted member 50702]

Same, i dont have to measure most of em tbh. Ipsilateral angle is low importance tho

Ca believers

 

[Deleted member 19968]

Losing bf % affects decent amount of ratios and if u get surgery u should check which ratios get affected to not look worse after

I have seen you become a very high iq looksmax theorist, I noticed bossman, don't worry.

 

[Deleted member 19968]

Ca believers

What does this have to do with CA?

 

[Deleted member 50702]

What does this have to do with CA?

You're saying it has low importance because of CA + bomer pfp

His system is flawed af

 

[Deleted member 19968]

You're saying it has low importance because of CA + bomer pfp

His system is flawed af

Bomer looks good in that pic. I dont think he is the best looking, and ratios do matter in itself, not talking about his system. Also the best rate is TINDER or IRL. Better than CA or a fucking retard throwing a random rate that isnt a woman

 

[Akhi]

His system is flawed af

elab, i always saw him as a very good objective rater

 

[Deleted member 50702]

elab, i always saw him as a very good objective rater

I'd leak too much

 

[anthony111553]

ratios is cope

 

[Deleted member 19968]

elab, i always saw him as a very good objective rater

His ratios score is not a flaw at all imo because its simply ratios but theyre only 40% of the whole attractiveness. But theres dimorphism and bodyfat factors as well which u kinda have to subjectively pick because u cant calculate it

 

[Mainstream]

elab, i always saw him as a very good objective rater

Overemphasis on rigid "ratio flaws", underemphasis of soft features. For starters. It's generally very characteristic of male gaze rating systems.

I'd leak too much

C'mon, this is the high IQ safe space thread, you can share what you think here.

 

[Deleted member 19968]

Overemphasis on rigid "ratio flaws", underemphasis of soft features. For starters. It's generally very characteristic of male gaze rating systems.


C'mon, this is the high IQ safe space thread, you can share what you think here.

Wdym by soft features? Eyebrows lips? What else? Hair?

 

[Akhi]

His ratios score is not a flaw at all imo because its simply ratios but theyre only 40% of the whole attractiveness. But theres dimorphism and bodyfat factors as well which u kinda have to subjectively pick because u cant calculate it

correct but CA also admits that his scores arent the full picture at all

a lot of attractiveness is just subjective so IMO well never have an accurate formula

 

[WeiWei]

Who cares

 

[Deleted member 50702]

Overemphasis on rigid "ratio flaws", underemphasis of soft features. For starters. It's generally very characteristic of male gaze rating systems.


C'mon, this is the high IQ safe space thread, you can share what you think here.

He's a deranged narcy that catered it to himself

Just read @Datdip old threads

 

[anthony111553]

Wdym by soft features? Eyebrows lips? What else? Hair?

Eyebrows and lips are an important feature

 

[Deleted member 19968]

correct but CA also admits that his scores arent the full picture at all

a lot of attractiveness is just subjective so IMO well never have an accurate formula

Its definitely better than some random here just sperging out a rate without thinking

 

[Akhi]

He's a deranged narcy that catered it to himself

Just read @Datdip old threads

he looks good regardless

 

[Akhi]

Overemphasis on rigid "ratio flaws", underemphasis of soft features. For starters. It's generally very characteristic of male gaze rating systems.

how would you objectively rate how good the soft features are? they depend a lot on preference

 

[st.hamudi but 6‘5]

cause it’s pointless u can’t change your ratios anyways

 

[Mainstream]

Wdym by soft features? Eyebrows lips? What else? Hair?

Yeah, plus phenotype and colouring.

I think "computed facial harmony" is actually good for comparing top 0.1% best-looking people in the world against one another. But the bottom 99% of people, who are in the LTN-MTN-HTN range below Chadlite, live or die by their soft features.

Another example: these two people would have a similar PSL score. Yet their attractiveness is worlds apart.

 

[Akhi]

cause it’s pointless u can’t change your ratios anyways

some of them

 

[Akhi]

Yeah, plus phenotype and colouring.

I think "computed facial harmony" is actually good for comparing top 0.1% best-looking people in the world against one another. But the bottom 99% of people, who are in the LTN-MTN-HTN range below Chadlite, live or die by their soft features.

Another example: these two people would have a similar PSL score. Yet their attractiveness is worlds apart.
View attachment 2668494

they wouldnt

rights ratios are a lot worse

 

[Deleted member 19968]

Yeah, plus phenotype and colouring.

I think "computed facial harmony" is actually good for comparing top 0.1% best-looking people in the world against one another. But the bottom 99% of people, who are in the LTN-MTN-HTN range below Chadlite, live or die by their soft features.

Another example: these two people would have a similar PSL score. Yet their attractiveness is worlds apart.
View attachment 2668494

They are not equal, and im talking about caucasian people only. Gooks and others have different ratios

 

[Mainstream]

he looks good regardless

Yeah, he's attractive obviously, but the fact his self-computed facial harmony is apparently top 0.000000001% or something makes you think there's something amiss.

how would you objectively rate how good the soft features are? they depend a lot on preference

There are some semi-measurable criteria and measurable criteria applying to soft features. I pay much more attention to the lip-to-nose ratio or the nose width to cheekbone width. Because I know (even from personal life experience) that women pay a surprising of attention to male lips.

In traditional PSL, nose and lips are but an afterthought after eyes, jaw, chin and even cheekbones.

 

[mogstars]

Bit of a water thread but still

It feels like most people here are just schizo- or shitposting, they dont really get into the details of ratios and all that autistic looks shit

why is that the case? is it because theyve already given up and knowing about ratios will make them rope? or are they just not interested enough and use this site as social media?

thoughts?

Because it's unfixable and mostly (useless) bullshit.

It's also pretty intuitive to know what your falios are and what you'd need to fix and you don't need autist pseudoscience to explain it.

 

[mogstars]

I have so many theories but who will listen? Ill get a dnrd or cope , and maybe 4 jfls so I dont bother. This forum is primarily just incels barking and sfcels who werent smart enough for stormfront site

If your theories were anything that reflected reality people would listen to it

Instead they're just mumbai sex-change clinic ramblings

 

[Akhi]

Yeah, he's attractive obviously, but the fact his self-computed facial harmony is apparently 0.001% makes you think there's something amiss.


There are some semi-measurable criteria and measurable criteria applying to soft features. I pay much more attention to the lip-to-nose ratio or the nose width to cheekbone width. Because I know (even from personal life experience) that women pay a surprising of attention to male lips.

In traditional PSL, nose and lips are but an afterthought after eyes, jaw, chin and even cheekbones.

yup, soft features are important and very underrated here

also add smile and teeth to that no one ever talks about it here but its a huge part of IRL attractiveness

 

[BrahminBoss]

If your theories were anything that reflected reality people would listen to it

Instead they're just mumbai sex-change clinic ramblings

Nope. I’m too high iq for you dalits and since I don’t share your circle jerk opinions I’m automatically regulated to jfls since that’s the only retort retards here can come up with

 

[Akhi]

Because it's unfixable and mostly (useless) bullshit.

you can change many of your ratios with surgery

It's also pretty intuitive to know what your falios are and what you'd need to fix and you don't need autist pseudoscience to explain it.

i dont think so

many people delude themselves, objective measurements that have real evidence are a good way to make sure you get rid of all bias

 

[mogstars]

you can change many of your ratios with surgery

You actually believe avg LTN-MTN here can get ideal ratios from surgery and become "Chad"? JFL

 

[DR. NICKGA]

You actually believe avg LTN-MTN here can get ideal ratios from surgery and become "Chad"? JFL

Depends on many things if someone can be chad or not with surgery lolol

 

[Mainstream]

He's a deranged narcy that catered it to himself

Just read @Datdip old threads

I've read his old stuff, really interesting. Honestly, he reacted really calmly to the aggressive trolling, didn't lower my opinion of him.

Have I ascended to chad yet, been losing some fat. Rate both psl and normie

Think I’m about 12 percent bf now and slowly cutting down to 8% but what would you rate me currently on both a psl and normie every day person scale. I wanna see how much of an improvement it makes once I’m super lean and whether it’s worth maintaining a super lean physique. Thanks boiz

looksmax.org

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

Bit of a water thread but still

It feels like most people here are just schizo- or shitposting, they dont really get into the details of ratios and all that autistic looks shit

why is that the case? is it because theyve already given up and knowing about ratios will make them rope? or are they just not interested enough and use this site as social media?

thoughts?

Phenotypes and mental tendencies and their correlation to psychological tendencies

Amongst the Jews, you will see, phenotypes correlating with behaviour especially. The most reduced/degenerate looking Armenoid Jews engaging in the worst culture wars and promotion of degeneracy. Armenoid Crypto-Jewish female promoting hypersexuality for Americans and Westerners in general...

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 19968]

You actually believe avg LTN-MTN here can get ideal ratios from surgery and become "Chad"? JFL

Dumbass if u have ltn ratios u would have to reconstruct ur whole skull to have ideal ratios

 

[mogstars]

Depends on many things if someone can be chad or not with surgery lolol

Yet no one in the whole forum did and it's a gay fantasy

"Hardmaxxers" here are HTN who went to chadlite after fixing 1 or 2 falios

 

[Deleted member 19968]

I've read his old stuff, really interesting. Honestly, he reacted really calmly to the aggressive trolling, didn't lower my opinion of him.

Have I ascended to chad yet, been losing some fat. Rate both psl and normie

Think I’m about 12 percent bf now and slowly cutting down to 8% but what would you rate me currently on both a psl and normie every day person scale. I wanna see how much of an improvement it makes once I’m super lean and whether it’s worth maintaining a super lean physique. Thanks boiz

looksmax.org

He looks better nowadays tbh, he looked very feminine and boyish back then.

 

[mogstars]

Dumbass if u have ltn ratios u would have to reconstruct ur whole skull to have ideal ratios

Dumbass proved my point while calling me a dumbass

 

[Deleted member 19968]

Dumbass proved my point while calling me a dumbass

I read fast mb bro Sorry