
thecel
morph king
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Posts
- 25,681
- Reputation
- 54,915
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
just ccw bimax. Sometimes they take bone off of your maxilla/lefort area.
Ccw bimax with impactionjust ccw bimax. Sometimes they take bone off of your maxilla/lefort area.
With implants she would look so good, just looking at her jaw alone in pic 2 it looks properly grown now
And many users want to get it with out any signs, it is only meant for people who have severe gummy smile (also other functional problems)
And many users want to get it with out any signs, it is only meant for people who have severe gummy smile (also other functional problems)
Good question.If you are downgrown, and have midface hypoplasia, with paranasal hollowing, then why hasn't anybody done a normal cut LF1 CCW, then waited for the bone to ossify, and then do a high cut lefort 1 for purely advancement after?
So both the jaws move forwards in the right direction with the alar rim
Not sure if it's angles, but her undereye region moved up a few mm less PFH
Nice try, but it will look much worse at the end of the day.
Yeah doing them together might be an issueGood question.
In fact, for cases of severe midfacial retrusion, orthognathic surgery is done in tandem with LF2/3.
I don't know why you couldn't do high LF1 minus the upper jaw. Never heard of this before.
I assume it's not a stable procedure in the way that a higher level osteotomy is.
Nice try, but it will look much worse at the end of the day.
View attachment 3638587
I mean, this is actually a good question, but i would think that:@lurking truecel @thecel @Snicket @chrishell
A high cut LF1 has limited ability to rotate the jaws CCW.
Whereas a normal cut LF1 does.
If you are downgrown, and have midface hypoplasia, with paranasal hollowing, then why hasn't anybody done a normal cut LF1 CCW, then waited for the bone to ossify, and then do a high cut lefort 1 for purely advancement after?
So both the jaws move forwards in the right direction with the alar rim
If you do have a gummy smile then you can get it but doing 2 surgeries that are meant to fix the philtrum isn't a good idea, you get what i mean.but I’m a long-philtrum-cel and want to shorten both the bone and the skin of the philtrum area:
View attachment 3638605
If you do have a gummy smile then you can get it but doing 2 surgeries that are meant to fix the philtrum isn't a good idea, you get what i mean.
Your proportions will be much smaller than you think.
Work with what you can tbh, better look natural than uncanny right?my philtrum is 20 mm long tho![]()
Work with what you can tbh, better look natural than uncanny right?
Highcut LeFort 1 is an awkward shape for many reasons. You are better off doing a regular LF1 and implants for any upper midface augmentation. If OP wants to reduce both bone and skin of the philtrum he needs both impaction and lip lift. There are many variations of lip lift depending on his needs. And if you are going to do that you need to account for philtrum to chin ratio, upper lip to lower lip ratio, ratio of facial thirds, absolute vermilion show of the upper lip, existing gingival show, teeth size, crown length, and absolute chin height. Of course the nose height cannot be changed so if that is where the excess midface length is coming from then he is out of luck.@lurking truecel @thecel @Snicket @chrishell
A high cut LF1 has limited ability to rotate the jaws CCW.
Whereas a normal cut LF1 does.
If you are downgrown, and have midface hypoplasia, with paranasal hollowing, then why hasn't anybody done a normal cut LF1 CCW, then waited for the bone to ossify, and then do a high cut lefort 1 for purely advancement after?
So both the jaws move forwards in the right direction with the alar rim
That girl did not have a severe gummy smileAnd many users want to get it with out any signs, it is only meant for people who have severe gummy smile (also other functional problems)
Why is this the case ? Ive seen results where a specific type of lefort 1 cut impaction has managed to shrink nose length in midface in several different patients. I dont get why you said "of course" when there are loads of results of nose lengths being shrunken in patients with a high cut lefort 1.Highcut LeFort 1 is an awkward shape for many reasons. You are better off doing a regular LF1 and implants for any upper midface augmentation. If OP wants to reduce both bone and skin of the philtrum he needs both impaction and lip lift. There are many variations of lip lift depending on his needs. And if you are going to do that you need to account for philtrum to chin ratio, upper lip to lower lip ratio, ratio of facial thirds, absolute vermilion show of the upper lip, existing gingival show, teeth size, crown length, and absolute chin height. Of course the nose height cannot be changed so if that is where the excess midface length is coming from then he is out of luck.
Because LeFort 1, high cut or not, with or without impaction, does not reduce the length of your nose. It just doesn't. You did not see what you think you saw.Why is this the case ? Ive seen results where a specific type of lefort 1 cut impaction has managed to shrink nose length in midface in several different patients. I dont get why you said "of course" when there are loads of results of nose lengths being shrunken in patients with a high cut lefort 1.
Tbh it's probably just over bro. I have a 1.1 midface as wellI look uncanny already
I’d do anything to increase my 0.82 midface ratio
Talking about people who tend to have it like thisThat girl did not have a severe gummy smile
Because LeFort 1, high cut or not, with or without impaction, does not reduce the length of your nose. It just doesn't. You did not see what you think you saw.
Yeah I show a similar amount of gum when smilling, even more, is that considered gummy smile, or at least a slight one?Talking about people who tend to have it like thisView attachment 3649681
Because the cartilage stays the sameWhy doesn’t it shorten the length of your nose if the bottom of the nasal aperture is pushed upwards?
Because it's not pushed upwardsWhy doesn’t it shorten the length of your nose if the bottom of the nasal aperture is pushed upwards?
Because the cartilage stays the same
Because it's not pushed upwards
If LF1 shortened your nose, it would, but it doesn't.
Because it's not pushed upwards
If LF1 shortened your nose, it would, but it doesn't.
Looks like its movef upward.corrct me if i am wronghow is the cartilage the same if the base of the nose bone is higher up? do you mean that the cartilage droops down under the bone?
View attachment 3650552
the height of the nasal aperture is shorter, so where does the extra cartilage go? the surgeon doesn’t shorten the cartilage off the bottom?
The type of impaction represented in that image requires very particular circumstance (equal amounts of bone removed anteriorly and posteriorly). It would indeed very slightly reduce your nose height, as in absolute distance from radix to ans, although the cartilage would reform and likely in ways that counteract that effect and potentially require a rhinoplasty thereafter if your sole goal is to reduce nose height. The biggest "nose gains" you get from jaw surgery result not from the reduction of that absolute distance but the illusion of its reduction afforded by a more projected ANS, reduction in gingival show, and flatter occlusal plane. Most of the time that illusion matters more than reality. It is much more productive to worry about whether you are giving off a good illusion of a shorter nose instead of actually having a shorter nose. You can marginally lower the radix in rhinoplasty though.how is the cartilage the same if the base of the nose bone is higher up? do you mean that the cartilage droops down under the bone?
View attachment 3650552
the height of the nasal aperture is shorter, so where does the extra cartilage go? the surgeon doesn’t shorten the cartilage off the bottom?
Fellow horsecles we meet againTbh it's probably just over bro. I have a 1.1 midface as well
The type of impaction represented in that image requires very particular circumstance (equal amounts of bone removed anteriorly and posteriorly). It would indeed very slightly reduce your nose height, as in absolute distance from radix to ans, although the cartilage would reform and likely in ways that counteract that effect and potentially require a rhinoplasty thereafter if your sole goal is to reduce nose height. The biggest "nose gains" you get from jaw surgery result not from the reduction of that absolute distance but the illusion of its reduction afforded by a more projected ANS, reduction in gingival show, and flatter occlusal plane. Most of the time that illusion matters more than reality. It is much more productive to worry about whether you are giving off a good illusion of a shorter nose instead of actually having a shorter nose. You can marginally lower the radix in rhinoplasty though.