ouiii
Iron
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2026
- Posts
- 48
- Reputation
- 35
!DISCLAIMER! This post is simply theory and cannot be interpreted in a serious manner! Anything the writer states does not suggest racial prejudice, racial violence, or personal belief. This for writing purposes solely!
Darwin's theory of natural selection
On the Origin of Species, Darwin described natural selection as a process where organisms with advantageous variations are more likely to survive and reproduce, while less adapted individuals are eliminated.
I would like to first emphasize the differences in Africans and Europeans, if you will, and I would advocate that by the most conservative scientific determination that they can in no reality be considered similar genetically, phrenologically or biologically
Physical differences
Africans trace up to 20% of their DNA to The Homo Erectus Hominid, the being of which, is a Pleistocene-era, now rendered (supposedly) extinct Hominid, it is known by the pseudonym, "Upright Man", they are considered the oldest species of Hominid to possess modern-Human bodily proportions, with relatively elongated legs, and shorter arms. The vast majority of significant differences in limb and trunk between groups are reliant on racial affiliation, rather than sexual dimorphism. It is typical of Men, that they are to possess significantly longer arms (distal and proximal), comparatively in correspondence with women. Africans have longer upper arms and shins, relative to those of The White Race.
"Taken together, people with a smaller surface area, or SA, (Allen's rule) to body mass, or BM, (Bergmann's rule) ratio will be in colder climates and people with a larger SA/BM ratio will be in warmer climates (Ruff, 1994). The evolutionary adaptation behind this phenomenon is to increase heat retention in colder climates and increased heat loss (Taylor-Weale and Vinicius, 2007). Paleoanthropological research has shown that humans have adapted to colder climates in Europe within the Upper Paleolithic. In the beginning, Europeans had longer limbs relative to stature than in modern-day European populations (Ruff, 2002)."
"Data from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) and the Baltimore Men's Osteoporosis Study (MOST) show that, in both sexes, blacks have higher adjusted bone mineral density than whites and a slower age-adjusted annual rate of decline in bone mineral density. Genetic, nutritional, lifestyle and hormonal factors may contribute to these ethnic/racial differences in bone strength." It is fallacious and hypocritical to diminish the significance of these traits
Skull-wise, of the African it is often said that they possess prognathic jawlines, large teeth, and flat and wide noses with a low root, an absence of a nasal spine, a wide-space between eyes, of which are observable features. but to establish a common distinction amongst subspecies. Of the White Race, their skin is often some variant of ivory, their skulls are narrow and elongated, they possess open obtuse facial angles, broad jaws and sharp chins, and narrow noses with a high root, Aswell as smaller eye sockets. The skulls of Africans are prolonged and oblong-shaped, whereas Whites have more compressed, less hyperbolically garish features.
Whites are of course descended from admixture of The Cro-Magnon (European Early Modern Human, also identified by the acronym EEMH) and various other and were the precedent for anatomically-modern Humans, who occupied and were endemic to Europe; the genetic contribution, while not being solely Modern European, were categorically inline with broader pattern of population movements, whose intermediary was The Neolithic and Bronze Age, and were ancillary to the development of material cultures. The European Aurignacian Culture are predominantly renowned as having been known for innovation, advanced tools, early expressions of Human art, and their large cranial capacity. They coexisted alongside other categorically Modern-Human Cultures including but not limited to The Gravettian's and Perigo deans. The Cro-Magnons ability for higher cognitive function enabled them to survive the brutal climate of Europe in a transitory period in civilizational history. The Homo-Erectus and it's constituents had no such proposals of Human betterment.
The MAO-A gene has a strong positive correlation to crime, about 5% of Blacks possess the gene, whereas about 1% of whites have it. Prior to the adoption of agriculture 10,000 years go, they remained unaffected. Muscles were lost and waist-to-hip ratios declined in non-tribal societies. The agricultural revolution is what exploded The European population. 30 billion Europeans have been born in the last 10,000 years, only 5 billion have been born in Africa (Natural selection). The birthrates, extreme poverty, and inability of its persons and corruptible leadership are affectations of incompetence. There are many more reasons to classify separate subspecies of Humans. For example, The African possesses the admixture of up to 19% of a super-archaic hominin species that is not testable in the DNA of non-Africans. This 'phantasm' of a subspecies has yet to be identified in the fossil record.
Genetic cogitative disadvantage. Global IQ Map
DNA relations to Apes
This is the most crucial metric in this essay due to its importance and demand in western society. High collective IQ correlates with stronger GDP growth, higher innovation rates, and better technological advancement. Societies with higher cognitive capital tend to develop more complex institutions, adapt faster to change, and manage resources more sustainably in innovation-driven economies. This disparity can be observed through the quality of life of High vs low IQ nations. In addition, lower cognitive ability is directly connected to reactive and impulsive violence leading to higher incarceration rates. If you observe the world through an atheist perspective and view homo sapiens as they biologically are (a human sub species) it is not difficult to see which sect of humanity is greater cognitively, and which through evolution are bound for success
"The hunter–prey relationship is a classic example of natural selection in action — a relentless, coevolutionary battle that shapes the biology of life on Earth"
Darwin's theory of natural selection
On the Origin of Species, Darwin described natural selection as a process where organisms with advantageous variations are more likely to survive and reproduce, while less adapted individuals are eliminated.
I would like to first emphasize the differences in Africans and Europeans, if you will, and I would advocate that by the most conservative scientific determination that they can in no reality be considered similar genetically, phrenologically or biologically
Physical differences
Africans trace up to 20% of their DNA to The Homo Erectus Hominid, the being of which, is a Pleistocene-era, now rendered (supposedly) extinct Hominid, it is known by the pseudonym, "Upright Man", they are considered the oldest species of Hominid to possess modern-Human bodily proportions, with relatively elongated legs, and shorter arms. The vast majority of significant differences in limb and trunk between groups are reliant on racial affiliation, rather than sexual dimorphism. It is typical of Men, that they are to possess significantly longer arms (distal and proximal), comparatively in correspondence with women. Africans have longer upper arms and shins, relative to those of The White Race.
"Taken together, people with a smaller surface area, or SA, (Allen's rule) to body mass, or BM, (Bergmann's rule) ratio will be in colder climates and people with a larger SA/BM ratio will be in warmer climates (Ruff, 1994). The evolutionary adaptation behind this phenomenon is to increase heat retention in colder climates and increased heat loss (Taylor-Weale and Vinicius, 2007). Paleoanthropological research has shown that humans have adapted to colder climates in Europe within the Upper Paleolithic. In the beginning, Europeans had longer limbs relative to stature than in modern-day European populations (Ruff, 2002)."
"Data from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) and the Baltimore Men's Osteoporosis Study (MOST) show that, in both sexes, blacks have higher adjusted bone mineral density than whites and a slower age-adjusted annual rate of decline in bone mineral density. Genetic, nutritional, lifestyle and hormonal factors may contribute to these ethnic/racial differences in bone strength." It is fallacious and hypocritical to diminish the significance of these traits
Skull-wise, of the African it is often said that they possess prognathic jawlines, large teeth, and flat and wide noses with a low root, an absence of a nasal spine, a wide-space between eyes, of which are observable features. but to establish a common distinction amongst subspecies. Of the White Race, their skin is often some variant of ivory, their skulls are narrow and elongated, they possess open obtuse facial angles, broad jaws and sharp chins, and narrow noses with a high root, Aswell as smaller eye sockets. The skulls of Africans are prolonged and oblong-shaped, whereas Whites have more compressed, less hyperbolically garish features.
Whites are of course descended from admixture of The Cro-Magnon (European Early Modern Human, also identified by the acronym EEMH) and various other and were the precedent for anatomically-modern Humans, who occupied and were endemic to Europe; the genetic contribution, while not being solely Modern European, were categorically inline with broader pattern of population movements, whose intermediary was The Neolithic and Bronze Age, and were ancillary to the development of material cultures. The European Aurignacian Culture are predominantly renowned as having been known for innovation, advanced tools, early expressions of Human art, and their large cranial capacity. They coexisted alongside other categorically Modern-Human Cultures including but not limited to The Gravettian's and Perigo deans. The Cro-Magnons ability for higher cognitive function enabled them to survive the brutal climate of Europe in a transitory period in civilizational history. The Homo-Erectus and it's constituents had no such proposals of Human betterment.
The MAO-A gene has a strong positive correlation to crime, about 5% of Blacks possess the gene, whereas about 1% of whites have it. Prior to the adoption of agriculture 10,000 years go, they remained unaffected. Muscles were lost and waist-to-hip ratios declined in non-tribal societies. The agricultural revolution is what exploded The European population. 30 billion Europeans have been born in the last 10,000 years, only 5 billion have been born in Africa (Natural selection). The birthrates, extreme poverty, and inability of its persons and corruptible leadership are affectations of incompetence. There are many more reasons to classify separate subspecies of Humans. For example, The African possesses the admixture of up to 19% of a super-archaic hominin species that is not testable in the DNA of non-Africans. This 'phantasm' of a subspecies has yet to be identified in the fossil record.
Genetic cogitative disadvantage. Global IQ Map
DNA relations to Apes
"The hunter–prey relationship is a classic example of natural selection in action — a relentless, coevolutionary battle that shapes the biology of life on Earth"
Last edited:
