
Deleted member 616
BeChadOrDieTryin'
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
- Posts
- 16,288
- Reputation
- 22,651
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah I agree that he looks better in motion. I also sympathized more with him when watching the movie because I preferred his pheno (no homo).Josh mogs him so hard there
Affleck looks much better in that video, he has that classic american masculine look
None of them were 8/8, thom stridj mogs themBoth are 8/8 at that movie, hard duel
Josh looked insane back then and probably slightly edges, but he ages like a shit
At movie, HArtnet, but overall i would much rather looks like Affleck
None of them were 8/8, thom stridj mogs them
I agree with that so much but we havnt seen any vids of thom so its difficult to see how GL he is; but he looks godmode on his pics.Tom Stridj is frauding instagram photos with angles
Hollywood actors looks much better, because they are exposed at motion and from every single shitty angle and lighting, with broadest appeal
Prime Hartnett mogs him to moon and back, especially coloring , and max and prettyboy mix
Please dont post some cherrypicked as a prove i am wrong
Yeah that's a good point. I always find that actors tend to look better in motion than on pics where they don't look that striking. Male models? Not necessarily.Hollywood actors looks much better, because they are exposed at motion and from every single shitty angle and lighting, with broadest appeal