Its fixed to a degree depending on your genetics. Some are more expressive in showing it and others do not have it. Likewise with how you are raised.
I think morals exist independently from humans
Physiology is the key to understanding it.
i think it's philosophy
incorrect
why?
otherwise we woudnt have debates on whether something is morally right or not
i think we wouldn't debate what if right or wrong if it was subjective
i see where youre coming from
Most people would agree that killing someone’s wrong. But if you a police officer and you had to kill someone to protect an innocent persons life nobody would say that was wrong. When in fact they are the same thing
well but it doesn't make it subjective
Only a person extremely removed from nature would beleive this. In nature, might is right, there are no morals for natural humans, only survival and reproduction.
even if it's like this, how does this prove that morality isn't objective?
Because different cultures across the world have different moral codes? Morals like "dont kill" and "dont cannibalise" are thought to be intuitive in the west, but would a isolated tribe care about those morals? No.
but you are proving me that it is relative instead of subjective.
