i dont either. hes still shit.
he has very good eye shape, ansd above average jaw, but his nose and brows ruin his appeal, so id say hes still normie, but mogs the other 2. However, the guy on the bottom right mogs him and is definitely a HTN, almost chadlite, like a 6.75/10 imo
ginger = automatic sub 5
He sees himself as a 6 but gives this guy a 4...
this guy mogs him hardthats what i say. hes in delusion. ALL gingers get bullied Hard in UK and never get a crumb of pussy
He sees himself as a 6 but gives this guy a 4...
^And also... how does this disgusting looking Asian guy get a higher rating than the white guy?!
The asian guy is normie? he has absolutely zero chances in the dating market. he is also like 5'3 or something
Nah, look at the white and asian in motion. the white guy has better bones, but then asian guy has better soft features, cuz the white guy has terrible soft features. I rate independtly of ethnicity btw, you can argue asian loses 2 psl points cuz of his race, but thats subjective based on the woman, so I ignore race when I rate.
. That dude is a chadlite..
no hes not, cuz if he was the guy in the bottom right of the normie section would be in that group tooHe's obviously grouping chads and chadlites together
autism
Seems you're bad at ratings. The guy in the bottom right of the normie section is a high tier normie. Seems alot of people can't differentiate between a Chadlite and HTN on this site lol. Idk where you live but I live around alot of Hispanics and met plenty of Latino chadlites who look pretty similar to that guy having no trouble pulling women...
read before u make stupid claims
what I said in reference to the black guy and the rest of the normie section
The black guy is a HTN too... He's not a tyronelite. And I never said they did but a Chadlite is steps ahead of a HTN, especially on dating apps. It can make the difference between 5+ likes a day (HTN) vs 20+ likes a day (Chadlite) on Tinder. And their relationship/sexual dynamics with women will be entirely different. The chadlite is a 7/10. The black guy is a 6/10. If you disagree, I'd love for you to test this theory on an app and tell women to pick which of the men is more attractive out of the two... And there is nothing subhuman about his eyes.. This is why I question if alot of dudes on here even go outside.. curious to see where you live. Guarantee you don't live in gigachad land lmao. You dudes spend way too much time jacking off to models that you forget what normal human beings look like. There's a reason chadlites/tyronelites can still slay, despite them not being Chads. They are still pretty fucking rare.
bro im one of the only users who actively go out and has friends, and I have slays despiting objectively being a 4/10 in the face LOLOLOLOLOL
He sees himself as a 6 but gives this guy a 4...
^And also... how does this disgusting looking Asian guy get a higher rating than the white guy?!
I agree with all what you're saying. HTN and chadlite distinction is not clear as @MentalcelTyronelite is saying above - that's when looks become subjective to the woman, types and others become a factor. The bottom right in the Chad category is a solid chadlite (7/10) to me because he face is more defined, but subhuman eye area and the bottom right in the normie category is bordering chadlite (6.75/10), he'd be solid chadlite if his face was a bit leaner.
ryan gosling would be nothing without movie star status and halo, and his money. fucker is goofy looking. has nothing to do with rating, has everything to do with how retarded women are. there's a reason ugliness hasn't been bred out of existence, stupid shit wymxn keep getting ticked by money and status maxeers
I notice he often rates guys with long midfaces but some decent features high. It's like he doesn't consider it a serious failo
looksmax.org
