Most evil seems to stem from the Caucasian race slavery the holocaust the Armenian genocide. (I need to get this off my chest).

[reptiles]

The TRANS Atlantic SLAVE TRADE Were made by ARAB Muslims majority Caucasoid Along with Jewish Semites which were again Caucasoid They to participated in this sick way of living.Oh and off course the European whites they too participated in this barbaric practice. So the evil inflicted onto blacks was again by Caucasian participants of all types.

Jews,Arabs,Europeans they all participated in this sick practice of owning another human being.

Next the holocaust which some Caucasoids argue to make blacks shut up about their history.The common way this argument is phrased is jew's were victims of the holocaust too and yet they don't complain.

Well lets see the holocaust was done by EUROPEANS to other EUROPEANS the jews at the time.They were their for centuries their blood spawned back centuries to ancient Europe. Yet they still got killed off cause of some delusional nut needing some scape goat to project all evil onto.Even though the persons they were trying to commit holocaust onto was their own.

Next 1 the Irish slaves while yes it's true they were slaves but you wanna know whom they were slaves to ? that's right the british caucasoids.

And also to compare the Transatlantic slave trade to what the Irish experienced it's not even close it's comparing indentured servitude to chattel slavery these are very evil.


So in terms of evil i conclude the caucasian race is the most evil race in all of human history.

 

[Deleted member 3881]

The most evil race is the slavic race.

 

[reptiles]

The most evil race is the slavic race.

Their caucasoids but i don't know any evil they have done

 

[Deleted member 3177]

Didn't read. Evil is inherent to any species, and in itself is considered a positive trait which determines the survival chance of a race. The races which are aggressive and eliminate others based on their evaluation of their worth are the ones triumphant over the course of history. The cavemen who smashed others' heads in survived and breeded. Evil is a necessary trait, and one which determines testosterone levels and inhibition.

Killing some gooks in order to benefit from the massacre is seen as a positive trade between races; the dominant race finds reward eliminating an ethnic group, whereas said ethnic group ceases existing. It's the way things are. Caucasoids are way more aggressive and violent through history than the rest

 

[reptiles]

Didn't read. Evil is inherent to any species, and in itself is considered a positive trait which determines the survival chance of a race. The races which are aggressive and eliminate others based on their evaluation of their worth are the ones triumphant over the course of history. The cavemen who smashed others' heads in survived and breeded. Evil is a necessary trait, and one which determines testosterone levels and inhibition.

Killing some gooks in order to benefit from the massacre is seen as a positive trade between races; the dominant race finds reward eliminating an ethnic group, whereas said ethnic group ceases existing. It's the way things are. Caucasoids are way more aggressive and violent through history than the rest

If you didn't read you can't build an informed opinion.

And so far all the evil demonstrated was caused by caucasoids not whites i will heavily preface that but caucasoids.

Slaves the holocaust WW2 most of communist evil all by caucasoids

 

[Vermilioncore]

Brutally over

 

[Deleted member 209]

hitler was evil

 

[reptiles]

Brutally over

Things get worse for us but the next generation it only gets better

hitler was evil

Course he was not only that he was a delusional fanatic who believed in some master race and some root race bullshit

 

[Deleted member 3177]

If you didn't read you can't build an informed opinion.

And so far all the evil demonstrated was caused by caucasoids not whites i will heavily preface that but caucasoids.

Slaves the holocaust WW2 most of communist evil all by caucasoids

Your post is a case study on various genocides. No need to even read. I skipped the useless info and went to the root. "Evil" is a philosophical concept which entices the acts a race commits upon others to receive a benefit. All races are capable of evil, none as efficient as the Caucasoids due to their intellectual and positional superiority. Genocides between Caucasoids benefit a certain racial subgroup within it. It all stems down to the benefit of the one commiting the act. "Evil" is not real. Our concept of evil indicates that the evil must be nonsensical and spring from the want to hurt others, but no genocide or war ever happened because of a nonsensical want to hurt others. There are political and ideological beliefs supporting each thing that happens through history

 

[reptiles]

Your post is a case study on various genocides. No need to even read. I skipped the useless info and went to the root. "Evil" is a philosophical concept which entices the acts a race commits upon others to receive a benefit. All races are capable of evil, none as efficient as the Caucasoids due to their intellectual and positional superiority. Genocides between Caucasoids benefit a certain racial subgroup within it. It all stems down to the benefit of the one commiting the act. "Evil" is not real. Our concept of evil indicates that the evil must be nonsensical and spring from the want to hurt others, but no genocide or war ever happened because of a nonsensical want to hurt others. There are political and ideological beliefs supporting each thing that happens through history

Depends on how the term evil is used a.

And b yes while it's true all races are capable of evil the only race we have seen commit levels of atrocity to their own and others are Caucasoid..

As for caucasoids being superior i mean intellectually that's not true all in fact if you have to commit genocide that kinda implies your inferior.

3RD main point the genocides done though were done against their own people showing again caucasoids are not honorable but again evil bastards.


Also while evil is i guess normative (up to consensus) and not subjective their is a certain standard nearly all cultures at least sane ones universally hold onto.Like the idea of each person having a right to their own life if you violate those nomatively you have violated what is decent and in so doing are evil.

And a lot of these beliefs were mainly cause they thought of their type of caucasoid as superior to the other's/

Good example the British with the Irish they used to Call them white niggers.


These are not signs of superior but inferior if your warring and enslaving your own race.

 

[Deleted member 773]

You can barely form cohesive sentences. If whites hadn't made contact with your people you would still be banging rocks in a cave and chasing antelopes.

 

[Aesthetic]

Causacoids are also the best looking ones

Coincidence? i think not

 

[Deleted member 3177]

Depends on how the term evil is used a.

And b yes while it's true all races are capable of evil the only race we have seen commit levels of atrocity to their own and others are Caucasoid..

As for caucasoids being superior i mean intellectually that's not true all in fact if you have to commit genocide that kinda implies your inferior.

3RD main point the genocides done though were done against their own people showing again caucasoids are not honorable but again evil bastards.


Also while evil is i guess normative (up to consensus) and not subjective their is a certain standard nearly all cultures at least sane ones universally hold onto.Like the idea of each person having a right to their own life if you violate those nomatively you have violated what is decent and in so doing are evil.

And a lot of these beliefs were mainly cause they thought of their type of caucasoid as superior to the other's/

Good example the British with the Irish they used to Call them white niggers.


These are not signs of superior but inferior if your warring and enslaving your own race.

There's a reason as to why the concept of dark triad exists. Morality and ethic are standards upon which humanity holds all of its decisions, but when push comes to shove the solution to most problems stems from violent and drastic acts of aggression. Diplomacy is an attractive idea in a certain range, and when problems arise between entire ethnic subgroups or nations diplomacy is generally useless, because words can't solve problems. Evil is nonsensical. Rape is an act of evil, because it is not benefiting; it's barely an act of egotism. Genocide, while hurtful for the victim, is generally benefiting for the aggressor. Whites killing moors makes sense in the context in which the decision was taken. The Holocaust is also a decision which is somewhat rooted on rationality. The people deciding to kill masses are not crazy, and the decision is not nonsensical or random. Evil is fundamentally random

 

[reptiles]

Causacoids are also the best looking ones

Coincidence? i think not

I will some what agree with this but this is not what i'm arguing here.


Looks are not correlated with your moral goodness what so ever.


You can be evil and handsome.

 

[hebbewem]

The asians was pretty bad . The mongoles. That kill alot and took the plauge to europe . China under mao killed alot of people and what china is doing know uigers and other things

The japeneas and they masskilling and mass raping in asia

 

[reptiles]

You can barely form cohesive sentences. If whites hadn't made contact with your people you would still be banging rocks in a cave and chasing antelopes.

You could read that don't even lie also.

• Maurya Empire (322 to 185 BC)
• Gupta Empire (320 to 550 AD)
• The Mughal Empire (1526 - 1857 AD)
• Chola Empire (301 BC - 1279 AD)
• Chalukya Empire (543-1156 AD)
• Maratha Empire (1674-1820 AD)
• Vijayanagara Empire (1336-1660 AD)
• Khilji Empire (1290-1320 AD)
• British Empire (1858 and 1947 AD)
• Pala Empire (750-1174 CE)
• Kushan Empire (30-375 AD)
• Tughlaq dynasty (1320-1414 AD)
• Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC - 10 AD)
• Satavahana dynasty (230 BC - 199 AD)

But Indians din never built nothing bro.


Bro we would be in mud huts bro.


Also just so you know it was globalism and individualism that built it you literally would not have the west without other races stfu.

 

[Aesthetic]

I will some what agree with this but this is not what i'm arguing here.


Looks are not correlated with your moral goodness what so ever.


You can be evil and handsome.

the better looking the more dark triad and evil one is

 

[reptiles]

the better looking the more dark triad and evil one is

How so clarify

 

[Deleted member 773]

You could read that don't even lie also.

• Maurya Empire (322 to 185 BC)
• Gupta Empire (320 to 550 AD)
• The Mughal Empire (1526 - 1857 AD)
• Chola Empire (301 BC - 1279 AD)
• Chalukya Empire (543-1156 AD)
• Maratha Empire (1674-1820 AD)
• Vijayanagara Empire (1336-1660 AD)
• Khilji Empire (1290-1320 AD)
• British Empire (1858 and 1947 AD)
• Pala Empire (750-1174 CE)
• Kushan Empire (30-375 AD)
• Tughlaq dynasty (1320-1414 AD)
• Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC - 10 AD)
• Satavahana dynasty (230 BC - 199 AD)

But Indians din never built nothing bro.


Bro we would be in mud huts bro.


Also just so you know it was globalism and individualism that built it you literally would not have the west without other races stfu.

• British Empire (1858 and 1947 AD)

Freudian slip or did you just google "Indian civilizations" without reading what you're copy-pasting?

 

[Jagged0]

You could read that don't even lie also.

• Maurya Empire (322 to 185 BC)
• Gupta Empire (320 to 550 AD)
• The Mughal Empire (1526 - 1857 AD)
• Chola Empire (301 BC - 1279 AD)
• Chalukya Empire (543-1156 AD)
• Maratha Empire (1674-1820 AD)
• Vijayanagara Empire (1336-1660 AD)
• Khilji Empire (1290-1320 AD)
• British Empire (1858 and 1947 AD)
• Pala Empire (750-1174 CE)
• Kushan Empire (30-375 AD)
• Tughlaq dynasty (1320-1414 AD)
• Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC - 10 AD)
• Satavahana dynasty (230 BC - 199 AD)

But Indians din never built nothing bro.


Bro we would be in mud huts bro.


Also just so you know it was globalism and individualism that built it you literally would not have the west without other races stfu.

Indian history is rich not to mention their invention of numbers which Muslims took inspiration from

 

[reptiles]

Freudian slip or did you just google "Indian civilizations" without reading what you're copy-pasting?

So indians contributed nothing within the british empire are you this dishonest bro.

Also not all of them were off the british empire.

You do realize

Indian history is rich not to mention their invention of numbers which Muslims took inspiration from

All history is very rich i have issues when faggots though try to claim other peoples histories or try to act like theirs is superior

The asians was pretty bad . The mongoles. That kill alot and took the plauge to europe . China under mao killed alot of people and what china is doing know uigers and other things

The japeneas and they masskilling and mass raping in asia

The Mongols i guess you could make and argument some what.


The communism thing no while stalin tried to willingly kill his people MAO's issue were down cause he was an idiot.

 

[Jagged0]

Looks trolling aside

Human civilization would be nothing without all races if ancient Africans didn’t exist to travel across the globe we wouldn’t, if Muslims didn’t exist many advancements after the fall of the romans would be lost to us.

If Indians didn’t exist many of our mathematical advancements would not be possible not to mention Britain would have no access to the sub-continents resources causing them to lose to Germany in ww2

I can go on and on listing Chinese inventions like gunpowder or natives water transportation that we still use. Or the Jews advancements in banking or crafting. Arabic poetry but I won’t.

As many advancements that Europeans or us Americans have achieved it took thousand of years for it to all come together into this giant crazy pot of globalization with ideas all being shared across groups.

 

[Roping Subhuman]

Don't call them Caucasian man.

 

[reptiles]

Looks trolling aside

Human civilization would be nothing without all races if ancient Africans didn’t exist to travel across the globe we wouldn’t, if Muslims didn’t exist many advancements after the fall of the romans would be lost to us.

If Indians didn’t exist many of our mathematical advancements would not be possible not to mention Britain would have no access to the sub-continents resources causing them to lose to Germany in ww2

I can go on and on listing Chinese inventions like gunpowder or natives water transportation that we still use. Or the Jews advancements in banking or crafting. Arabic poetry but I won’t.

As many advancements that Europeans or us Americans have achieved it took thousand of years for it to all come together into this giant crazy pot of globalization with ideas all being shared across groups.

Exactly it's not IQ it's ecanomics of the system and globalization it's no coincidence the innovations occured here

Don't call them Caucasian man.

But biological anthropologists classify them as that

 

[Deleted member 3177]

Since you didn't read my college essay

Evil = hurtful acts done at random, such as niggers raping or killing due to behavioural issues
Caucasoids doing genocide = historically distorted massacres which were done thoughtfully and logically and were rooted in rationality to fix an issue between ethnic subgroups or nations

It's like saying war is evil

 

[Deleted member 3702]

why white are called caucasian?
I'm caucasian because I come from Caucasus and not because I'm european or something like this

 

[reptiles]

why white are called caucasian?
I'm caucasian because I come from Caucasus and not because I'm european or something like this

Your caucasus cause you share genes to europeans that's why or similar type.


Your phenotype matches europeans.

So your caucasoid

Since you didn't read my college essay

Evil = hurtful acts done at random, such as niggers raping or killing due to behavioural issues
Caucasoids doing genocide = historically distorted massacres which were done thoughtfully and logically and were rooted in rationality to fix an issue between ethnic subgroups or nations

It's like saying war is evil

Define evil first.


And also that's literally what they all say you have to look at it from the enemies perspective.

No no you don't the persians didn't do half this fucking shit and they were an empire.


These evil bastards did what they did cause their ideas reinforced their notions of superiority.


But the way i look at it is superior beings don't need to conquer others.That is a sign of inferiority

 

[diggbicc]

Just blame all kike doings on whites theory

 

[YoungJohnnyDepp]

They killed each other aswell tbh

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Mongols ?