Most men are not supposed to have children

Eärendil

Eärendil

Eternal beauty
Joined
May 20, 2025
Posts
231
Reputation
530
Yes this is water, but it is not obvious to some

In nature only the best genes survive and get passed on. Forced marriages for 1000s of years have led every man to believe he deserves a woman. The reality is in nature very few actually thrive and prosper. For every bug you see there are 1000 who never matured. Most are made to lose. Women have the job of bearing children and since they inherently want the child to have the best genes very few are the ones they want to reproduce with.

@greycel
 
  • +1
Reactions: DeadTrees, uksucks, Alias! and 5 others
Thats why rape is okay

Inb4 oofy doofys say rape is bad because muhh morals when morals are man made opposed to the will or a man to spread his dna that is pure instinct
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: justlurkingaround, Sprinkles, Alias! and 2 others
Thats why rape is okay

Inb4 oofy doofys say rape is bad because muhh morals when morals are man made opposed to the will or a man to spread his dna that is pure instinct
You can rape but your genes are still shit and your kids will either have to rape or die out
 
You can rape but your genes are still shit and your kids will either have to rape or die out
So what ? You spread ur genes, now ur kids will do the same if necessary, its pure instinct, no need to teach it
 
  • JFL
Reactions: R@m@, Alias!, Eärendil and 1 other person
So what ? You spread ur genes, now ur kids will do the same if necessary, its pure instinct, no need to teach it
LET YOUR SUBHUMAN GENES DIE OUT ,SON. SO MY FUTURE STACY DAUGHTER DOESNT NEED TO LAY HER BEAUTIFUL EYES UPON YOUR SUBHUMAN CHILD :ogre:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: R@m@, Alias!, 6ft5geneticsaviour and 1 other person
True, but the women back then never had a choice in who they want
It doesn’t have much to do with them wanting good genes… nature’s order ensured good genes to sift through.

They’d get bred by the most physically dominant, who wouldn’t be a prettyboy but a very dimorphic ogre with wide waist and shoulders, long arms. Face wouldn’t matter nearly as much as it currently does
+ the man who brought the most food to the tribe (smartest) - @Baldingman1998 was talking about this

And also it should be noted, evolving doesn’t have to be seen as specifically choosing the good, it can also be from the perspective of not choosing the bad
So the extent to which this selectiveness exists, doesn’t have to be that great — as long as you’re heading in the positive direction (there is some sifting involved)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Alias!, Baldingman1998, 160cmcurry and 1 other person
LET YOUR SUBHUMAN GENES DIE OUT ,SON. SO MY FUTURE STACY DAUGHTER DOESNT NEED TO LAY HER BEAUTIFUL EYES UPON YOUR SUBHUMAN CHILD :ogre:
If you are here you have subhuman genes
And your subhuman daughter will be used as cum toilet so a subhuman pig can spread his genes
Keep mental masturbating
 
  • JFL
Reactions: unowkn and Eärendil
Its not only guys either tho tbh, some women are also fucked
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eärendil
If you are here you have subhuman genes
And your subhuman daughter will be used as cum toilet so a subhuman pig can spread his genes
Keep mental masturbating
IN YOUR DREAMS PAL FOID DONT EVEN LOOK AT ME:lul::lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Eärendil
society is still nature, if you want/can have kids you deserve it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alias! and Eärendil
True, but the women back then never had a choice in who they want
It doesn’t have much to do with them wanting good genes… nature’s order ensured good genes to sift through.

They’d get bred by the most physically dominant, who wouldn’t be a prettyboy but a very dimorphic ogre with wide waist and shoulders, long arms. Face wouldn’t matter nearly as much as it currently does
+ the man who brought the most food to the tribe (smartest) - @Baldingman1998 was talking about this

And also it should be noted, evolving doesn’t have to be seen as specifically choosing the good, it can also be from the perspective of not choosing the bad
So the extent to which this selectiveness exists, doesn’t have to be that great — as long as you’re heading in the positive direction (there is some sifting involved)
These days even some disabled and down syndrome etc people have kids. During hunter gatherer times they would have been thrown off a cliff, life was that brutal and genetics decide who wins.

Also I don't think women cared much about having a choice. In nature females of animals just flock to the strongest male and if another male becomes stronger they switch up instantly to him. I think this is still true even in modern society
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
So what ? You spread ur genes, now ur kids will do the same if necessary, its pure instinct, no need to teach it
until someone bashes the skulls of ur subhuman children, by pure instict, i think a lot would desire that
 
  • JFL
Reactions: R@m@ and Eärendil
These days even some disabled and down syndrome etc people have kids. During hunter gatherer times they would have been thrown off a cliff, life was that brutal and genetics decide who wins.

Also I don't think women cared much about having a choice. In nature females of animals just flock to the strongest male and if another male becomes stronger they switch up instantly to him. I think this is still true even in modern society
The idea of selectiveness still exists in modern day society, but what makes up the criteria for it has changed

Also, like you said, that’s why women are evolutionarily programmed to love less than men. Our female ancestors who procreated, were the ones who were more able to cope with being taken advantage of.
The ones who didn’t never gave birth

It’s interesting though that the idea of selectiveness was prioritised over innate desire for dimorphism.. the idea that women suppressed their animalistic nature for preferring something of value.
When do you think we cross this line? Our ape ancestors prioritised dimorphism and modern day humans prefer selectivity.
Maybe early days of civilisation, when society’s influence on what is good/bad mattered more than whatever you were biologically drawn to — or where the ones who couldn’t integrate with conforming to laws/viewpoints held by society, were killed off and never continued their bloodline

I might make a thread on this
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eärendil
thanks for the water
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eärendil
The idea of selectiveness still exists in modern day society, but what makes up the criteria for it has changed

Also, like you said, that’s why women are evolutionarily programmed to love less than men. Our female ancestors who procreated, were the ones who were more able to cope with being taken advantage of.
The ones who didn’t never gave birth

It’s interesting though that the idea of selectiveness was prioritised over innate desire for dimorphism.. the idea that women suppressed their animalistic nature for preferring something of value.
When do you think we cross this line? Our ape ancestors prioritised dimorphism and modern day humans prefer selectivity.
Maybe early days of civilisation, when society’s influence on what is good/bad mattered more than whatever you were biologically drawn to — or where the ones who couldn’t integrate with conforming to laws/viewpoints held by society, were killed off and never continued their bloodline

I might make a thread on this
I think women are still able to feel strong love. They just have to be virgins or in love with their first. Imgine some promiscous becky trying to love some guy. Shes just gonna dip the second anything better comes. So it's also up to this factor. But mainly biological pressure on women to pass on the best genes.

This is easy to imagine. Some billionare with a young stacy wife, who secretly fucks the chad poolboy. This is the ideal situation for her: she gets a kid with chad genes and unlimited resources for the kid and her. But even this sometimes breaks. Tom Brady is 6'4 hhtn athlete with hundreds of millions of dollars yet his wife cheated on him with some 5'7 ethnic personal trainer, tough to say why.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Yes this is water, but it is not obvious to some

In nature only the best genes survive and get passed on. Forced marriages for 1000s of years have led every man to believe he deserves a woman. The reality is in nature very few actually thrive and prosper. For every bug you see there are 1000 who never matured. Most are made to lose. Women have the job of bearing children and since they inherently want the child to have the best genes very few are the ones they want to reproduce with.

@greycel
Farming gave mfs the opurtunity to eat meat despite being shit at hunting and mfs wasted all of that by breaking their backs in order to eat tasteless grainsludge.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eärendil
True, but the women back then never had a choice in who they want
It doesn’t have much to do with them wanting good genes… nature’s order ensured good genes to sift through.

They’d get bred by the most physically dominant, who wouldn’t be a prettyboy but a very dimorphic ogre with wide waist and shoulders, long arms. Face wouldn’t matter nearly as much as it currently does
+ the man who brought the most food to the tribe (smartest) - @Baldingman1998 was talking about this

And also it should be noted, evolving doesn’t have to be seen as specifically choosing the good, it can also be from the perspective of not choosing the bad
So the extent to which this selectiveness exists, doesn’t have to be that great — as long as you’re heading in the positive direction (there is some sifting involved)
I think in reality competence influence and power are the most important things when it comes to mating success for men. Looks obviously matter too but if she doesn't feel safe with you looks are irrelevant other than one night stand
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel and Eärendil
Thats why rape is okay

Inb4 oofy doofys say rape is bad because muhh morals when morals are man made opposed to the will or a man to spread his dna that is pure instinct
I have a hard time understanding why rape is so wrong although I think it's wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eärendil
True, but the women back then never had a choice in who they want
It doesn’t have much to do with them wanting good genes… nature’s order ensured good genes to sift through.

They’d get bred by the most physically dominant, who wouldn’t be a prettyboy but a very dimorphic ogre with wide waist and shoulders, long arms. Face wouldn’t matter nearly as much as it currently does
+ the man who brought the most food to the tribe (smartest) - @Baldingman1998 was talking about this

And also it should be noted, evolving doesn’t have to be seen as specifically choosing the good, it can also be from the perspective of not choosing the bad
So the extent to which this selectiveness exists, doesn’t have to be that great — as long as you’re heading in the positive direction (there is some sifting involved)
Most successful men are social and smart not only strong and physically superior. Manipulate people and be dark triad narcissist while being above average physically. Although most of us aren't born to be that way. But that personality type attains the most power.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel and Eärendil
I have a hard time understanding why rape is so wrong although I think it's wrong
Because you have been endoctrinated by society morals, they told you whats right and whats wrong and u just had to swallow the bs or would be put in a mental asylum
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eärendil

Similar threads

CorinthianLOX
Blackpill Nature is God
Replies
38
Views
456
Hitlerstopguy05
Hitlerstopguy05
L
Replies
24
Views
619
They_are_all_whores
They_are_all_whores
greycel
Replies
68
Views
1K
The Homelander
The Homelander
Kaari
Replies
70
Views
1K
Mike456
Mike456

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top