consult the graph
Reply rates don't show us who actually met and partnered up. So, it is worthless on it's own.
Meanwhile 15% of asian women go for white guys, 42.4% of 'other' goes for white guys. Except black women since they have dogshit smv along with black males.
Asian women are spread all across the United States. Unless they date their brother, of course they're open to potentially marrying white men, especially since white men <2010 were the majority of available men. And the majority of that 15% are 35+ in age and are considered leftovers in the asian community. The racepill is a myth.
No, mulattos do.
Most of the time they look inbred if we're being real
mulattos are basically considered "BLACK" by a majority of the black population, even mulattos themselves admit it
What about the stats showing that Black men have lower virginity rates than most other races in America which I posted on here before?
I don't care what the average 80 IQ twit 'thinks.' They're not black if they're mixed and have white genetics. Even 'African Americans' aren't even blacks, lmao.
Blacks are more impulsive and thus have a lower freshhold for what they deem as fuckable.
n they think theyre black nonetheless
Master is obese and wears glasses. Looks nothing like that guy
What if @cromagnon tries to steal his chicken??
Stop trying to claim lightskins nigger, the only reason they ally with your pathetic broke ass is cos they'd get demonised for even attempting to call themselves white
they get demonised by ur kind u stupid fucking cumskinned faggot i'm not trying to "claim" them they're claiming themselves into black society
That's not really true though.
Cos they have no choice but to
The majority of Mulattoes irl are treated as more "Black" than "White" by White people man jfl.
Nigga....every single Black family in America has a range of "lightskins" and "darkskins" in the same family.
You darkskins are happy to claim lightskins when they suit you and throw them away like dirt afterwards
Cos they have no choice but to
Dumbest take I've seen on here lmao.
www.ancestry.com
The fact that they hit puberty earlier, have higher STD rates and have sexual intercourse at a much younger age on average when compared to whites and asians proves that you are wrong.
You're stupid. Nothing you've said counters anything i've stated. It doesn't matter if they're predominantly African, they're still a mixed race group with white genetics fixed in their genome.
Why are you lumping Whites and Asians together?
If you're pred. African, you're still Black even if you have some admixture.
Because of the aforementioned reasons...
Blacks are on a whole other level conpared to whites. Realistically, the races are in 3 seperate categories with whites being intermediate.
So, in your world, there's no difference between a 100% African and an african American who's 79% African and 21% white?
Not really. Whites are quite sexually loose. Many White girls rank up porn star level body counts before hitting 20.
There's a difference but it's still irrelevant when it comes to being seen as "Black" and having a general overlap in looks.So, in your world, there's no difference between a 100% African and an african American who's 79% African and 21% white?
"Many" yeah, in your imagination, maybe.
Finally, you've admitted to there being a gap. It's still wide enough for there to be noticeable differences between the races.
"Which is close to pure." You've just admitted that she isn't symbolising that that the average African American isn't either because they lack purity. So, what's with your contention?
White girls are literally known for having tons of casual sex.
Single motherhood has more to do with having kids out of wedlock with the wrong type of dude than overall promiscuity.
It's really not all that wide though.
I'm saying it doesn't matter because we're all perceived as "Black" anyway.
Most don't have tonnes of sexual partners. Nowhere near as many as black women.
It's not down to family structural differences, it is mostly down to genetic differences.
The wrong type of person is a man who is impulsive and cares less about family hood and community stability. Like attracts like.
Source?
The dual mating strategy doesn't exist.
Those are white trash. They aren't indicative of a large portion of white people.
I don't give a fuck about how you're all perceived. Genetically speaking, a person who has admixture from another race is a mixed person.
I don't care what the average 99 IQ white thinks. Factually speaking, a mixed population isn't the same as a pure untouched population.
Many of them do. They're just better at hiding it.
No. It's culture.
Exactly. But this is largely a lower-income thing in general. Trailer parks have basically the same dynamics.
Common sense. White women have more money than most other races of women. Contraceptives and birth control are most accessible to women with money.
This is probably the strongest cope I've read on this whole forum.
I said the suburbs. Suburban Whites absolutely have a hypersexual culture and hookup culture among them.
But when you still appear "Black" or like a "nigger" to non-Blacks, what does it matter?
Again, this shit doesn't matter when people still see them as "Black" on a social basis.
The science is not on your side. Blacks are faster in life history and put less emphasis on parental investment, hence their faster development and high partner count.
Wrong. It's almost entirely genetic the differences.
This wasn't always the case. Only in the past 200 years has this change taken place, and it's down to the life history of Europeans speeding up on average.
Because they're closer to blacks in their life history.
Even if they had easy access to the pill, the impulsiveness nature of black women will prevent then from consistently taking the pill on a daily basis. These slip ups will result in pregnancy.
I will reiterate. It doesn't exist. The DMS has no scientific credibility and is no longer taken seriously.
They still don't have very high sexual partner counts like you're claiming like blacks.
Again. Objectively speaking, the average African American is a hybrid of both races. Thus, they aren't the same as African blacks.
Can we be honest here? Because women in general often lie about their n-count, it's really just speculation at the end of the day and no one's going to reach a real conclusion.
Nope. It's cultural.
Who cares about 200 years ago lol? We're talking about the modern times.
They have nothing to do with Blacks jfl. Go to West Virginia right now and tell the poor Whites there that they're "close" to Blacks. They'll laugh you out of the whole state.
Sounds like cope.
Why would you need "science" to observe something that's a normal occurence.
Again, women lie about their n-count worse than Pinocchio so there's no real evidence behind it. Even the fertility rates of BW and WW in the U.S. aren't far off.
That's true but it doesn't matter at all.
