Muh money are only good for betabuxxing

[Deleted member 6512]

Elon Musk cucked Johnny Depp and had a threesome with his wife and Cara Delavigne.
Being top 1% in something is legit af, of course we could not become Elon Musk but this shows that even statusmaxxed Chads can be cucked (i know Johnny is old now but still)
I knew a girl who fucked this fat fuck who owned a club in my city, when i asked her why she said "i dont know, he is like Adolf Hitler here, if he talks anyone listens and this turns me on"
She never received money nor benefits by fucking him, and I know since she was very open with me, so i think that yes, genetics is what makes you attractive, but genetics is a very complex argument that can't be just limited to body. No amount of beauty, for example, can make you a strong leader, can you imagine Jordan Barrett leading a country? Can you imagine him having a beef with a man like, for example, 50 Cent? Thats why i think that face and body are not the only traits that can tell a good genetic fitness, may sound like cope idk.

Article

Elon Musk Bluntly Denies The Alleged Threesome With Amber Heard In Johnny Depp Court Case

Elon Musk is in the papers again, but this time it has nothing to do with his baby's name.

www.google.com

 

[Deleted member 7917]

Amber Heard would get it so hard up her bumhole, I could coom just thinking about it.

Status is underrated I agree with you.

 

[zeroshame]

Elon Musk cucked Johnny Depp and had a threesome with his wife and Cara Delavigne.
Being top 1% in something is legit af, of course we could not become Elon Musk but this shows that even statusmaxxed Chads can be cucked (i know Johnny is old now but still)
I knew a girl who fucked this fat fuck who owned a club in my city, when i asked her why she said "i dont know, he is like Adolf Hitler here, if he talks anyone listens and this turns me on"
She never received money nor benefits by fucking him, and I know since she was very open with me, so i think that yes, genetics is what makes you attractive, but genetics is a very complex argument that can't be just limited to body. No amount of beauty, for example, can make you a strong leader, can you imagine Jordan Barrett leading a country? Can you imagine him having a beef with a man like, for example, 50 Cent? Thats why i think that face and body are not the only traits that can tell a good genetic fitness, may sound like cope idk.

Article

Elon Musk Bluntly Denies The Alleged Threesome With Amber Heard In Johnny Depp Court Case

Elon Musk is in the papers again, but this time it has nothing to do with his baby's name.

www.google.com

Random celebrity gossip and anectodal evidence about "some girl fucking a fatass in my city".
Status is good to boost yourself when you're already attractive (actually, being attractive will usually boost your status, ironically enough) but it doesn't create attraction when you're otherwise repellent: it only creates a desire for exploitation. "I will try and marry this very influential guy so I can live a cozy lifestyle, but I'll look for ways to fuck Chad behind his back regardless".

 

[Deleted member 3573]

Being 5.5 - 6 PSL and ascending further, I WISH THIS WASN'T THE CASE. I wish looks were all that mattered so that girls don't fuck disgusting fat fucks. That's the big problem for someone like me and why i get disgruntled all the time when I hear about her disgusting ex or when I see a hot girl with a disgusting fuck. Even with a moneymaxxing plan and route, I'll never get a pure bitch in today's world

 

[Deleted member 6512]

Random celebrity gossip and anectodal evidence about "some girl fucking a fatass in my city".
Status is good to boost yourself when you're already attractive (actually, being attractive will usually boost your status, ironically enough) but it doesn't create attraction when you're otherwise repellent: it only creates a desire for exploitation. "I will try and marry this very influential guy so I can live a cozy lifestyle, but I'll look for ways to fuck Chad behind his back regardless".

That's not random celebrity gossip, that's what Depp said while divorcing, do you think he would say that and make himself look like a cuck? And i was talking about fucking, not marrying, do you think that Amber Heard was thinking about marrying Musk when they were having a threesome? Jfl.
The fat fuck in my city is an example of someone who lifemogs us just because he has power, and I think that power lust is even older than looks, since we like looks because its an indicator of genetic health, and a man with looks has the potential to be powerful, thats how it works for gorilass for example, the most powerful gets all the women regardless of his looks.

 

[zeroshame]

The fat fuck in my city is an example of someone who lifemogs us just because he has power, and I think that power lust is even older than looks, since we like looks because its an indicator of genetic health, and a man with looks has the potential to be powerful, thats how it works for gorilass for example, the most powerful gets all the women regardless of his looks.

I agree on this tbh. Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac, after all. Problem is that looks work on almost all women, while the amount of women who'd hook up with a really powerful man just because he's powerful aren't nearly as high, + young women (the best women...) would go for poor chad over rich fatass every time.

 

[goat2x]

bruh you have more chance to become psl 7 than become top 1%

 

[Deleted member 6512]

I agree on this tbh. Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac, after all. Problem is that looks work on almost all women, while the amount of women who'd hook up with a really powerful man just because he's powerful aren't nearly as high, + young women (the best women...) would go for poor chad over rich fatass every time.

That's true too, thats why its important to looksmaxx and appear decent and if you can even statusmaxx, so you can have a bigger appeal.
I think that young women like power too, but they live in their own environment where dynamics are shifted, they dont know how the real world works and who has the real power, so for them a popstar or the school basketball best player is the best option because they are oblivious about what happens outside. Talking to women, they all said that they had crushes for prettyboys but then it changed overtime because they started to seem "weak" compared to more masculine men, and being weak means its over.

 

[Deleted member 6512]

bruh you have more chance to become psl 7 than become top 1%

I know brother, i'm just talking about extremes so we can understand better.

 

[zeroshame]

Talking to women, they all said that they had crushes for prettyboys but then it changed overtime because they started to seem "weak" compared to more masculine men, and being weak means its over.

Idk about that. Frankly, I'd rather be a prettyboy and keep fucking 20 year olds forever than be an influential rich fatass who fucks milfs and cougars who are constantly eyeing my money.
I will agree that women's tastes shift a bit with age, but I don't think they really shift all that much. Like, 16 year olds just like a pretty clean shaven face with nice hair on a not-hideous body. As they get older, they want the same guy they liked at 16, just a little more masculine (a bit more muscle, taller than them, maybe some facial hair).

 

[Patient A]

Just be a billionaire and get a hair transplant theory

 

[Deleted member 6512]

Idk about that. Frankly, I'd rather be a prettyboy and keep fucking 20 year olds forever than be an influential rich fatass who fucks milfs and cougars who are constantly eyeing my money.
I will agree that women's tastes shift a bit with age, but I don't think they really shift all that much. Like, 16 year olds just like a pretty clean shaven face with nice hair on a not-hideous body. As they get older, they want the same guy they liked at 16, just a little more masculine (a bit more muscle, taller than them, maybe some facial hair).

Problem is that prettyboys usually age like shit. I dont agree with the second part of your statement tho, since at 16 they like guys like Bieber and at 25 they like guys like Chris Carmack for example, and they are not very similar.

 

[elfmaxx]

Elon Musk is GLing tho

 

[zeroshame]

Problem is that prettyboys usually age like shit. I dont agree with the second part of your statement tho, since at 16 they like guys like Bieber and at 25 they like guys like Chris Carmack for example, and they are not very similar.

Look at Carmack though. You notice a pattern? Lean body with minimal body hair, chiseled face with minimal facial hair, nice longer hair than the average guy... these are still all prettyboy traits, just with a masculine "spin" to make her feel more feminine in comparison to him. He's obviously way more masc than a fag like Bieber but he still exhibits the very same traits.

I do agree prettyboys usually age like shit, one failo and you're fucking done. Start norwooding? Start getting bloated? Didn't wear sunscreen and got wrinkles? > over for you. Now you don't look pretty and you don't look masculine.
Some guys do manage to handle it well though. Look at Leto or Pitt, or even Depp. They still kept that "prettyboy" vibe even after their 30s.

 

[eduardkoopman]

Elon Musk cucked Johnny Depp and had a threesome with his wife and Cara Delavigne.
Being top 1% in something is legit af, of course we could not become Elon Musk but this shows that even statusmaxxed Chads can be cucked (i know Johnny is old now but still)
I knew a girl who fucked this fat fuck who owned a club in my city, when i asked her why she said "i dont know, he is like Adolf Hitler here, if he talks anyone listens and this turns me on"
She never received money nor benefits by fucking him, and I know since she was very open with me, so i think that yes, genetics is what makes you attractive, but genetics is a very complex argument that can't be just limited to body. No amount of beauty, for example, can make you a strong leader, can you imagine Jordan Barrett leading a country? Can you imagine him having a beef with a man like, for example, 50 Cent? Thats why i think that face and body are not the only traits that can tell a good genetic fitness, may sound like cope idk.

Article

Elon Musk Bluntly Denies The Alleged Threesome With Amber Heard In Johnny Depp Court Case

Elon Musk is in the papers again, but this time it has nothing to do with his baby's name.

www.google.com

LEGIT

Although with money, maybe more like being top 0.05% (not 1/100 but 1/5000).

Being super rich like Musk, or some other multi-millionaire. Or being like top SatusMaxxed somewhere into like Top 0.05% orso.

Is a massive hallo.

To add though.
|The thing is. Being like TOP 10% in money/income status. Which is very good. Will do limited little.

For examples: How being "just" top 10% in money (maybe even status?) orso does little.
to quote:"
"The stereotypical example of that is known in sociology as a “beauty-status exchange”—an attractive person marries a wealthy or otherwise powerful person, and both win.

University of Notre Dame sociologist Elizabeth McClintock has done exhaustive research on the idea of people exchanging traits.

McClintock found that outside of ailing tycoons (super rich), in the practical world it basically doesn’t exist. Where it does, it doesn’t last. The dominant force in mating is matching.

What appears to be an exchange of beauty for socioeconomic status is often actually not an exchange, McClintock wrote, but a series of matched virtues. Economically successful women partner with economically successful men, and physically attractive women partner with physically attractive men.

“Sometimes you hear that really nice guys get hot girls,” McClintock told me, “[but] I found that really nice guys get really nice girls. [Being nice] is not really buying you any currency in the attractiveness realm. If the guys are hot, too, then sure, they can get a hot girl.”

Because people of high socioeconomic status are, on average, rated as more physically attractive than people of lower status, many correlations between one partner's appearance and the other partner's status are spurious and misconstrued.

“Women spend a lot more time trying to look good than men do,” McClintock said


The Myth of Wealthy Men and Beautiful Women

"

I think this is correct.
Like guy with good salaries, but not mega rich. it doesn't help that much.

For EXAMPLE from a West nation.
This dude, is an engineer. He likely earns a salary that is TOP 10%. YET, still incel in Australia.
Luckily his income, can afford it for him to go locationmaxxing.

 

[Deleted member 6512]

LEGIT

Although with money, maybe more like being top 0.05% (not 1/100 but 1/5000).

Being super rich like Musk, or some other multi-millionaire. Or being like top SatusMaxxed somewhere into like Top 0.05% orso.

Is a massive hallo.

To add though.
|The thing is. Being like TOP 10% in money/income status. Which is very good. Will do limited little.

For examples: How being "just" top 10% in money (maybe even status?) orso does little.
to quote:"
"The stereotypical example of that is known in sociology as a “beauty-status exchange”—an attractive person marries a wealthy or otherwise powerful person, and both win.

University of Notre Dame sociologist Elizabeth McClintock has done exhaustive research on the idea of people exchanging traits.

McClintock found that outside of ailing tycoons (super rich), in the practical world it basically doesn’t exist. Where it does, it doesn’t last. The dominant force in mating is matching.

What appears to be an exchange of beauty for socioeconomic status is often actually not an exchange, McClintock wrote, but a series of matched virtues. Economically successful women partner with economically successful men, and physically attractive women partner with physically attractive men.

“Sometimes you hear that really nice guys get hot girls,” McClintock told me, “[but] I found that really nice guys get really nice girls. [Being nice] is not really buying you any currency in the attractiveness realm. If the guys are hot, too, then sure, they can get a hot girl.”

Because people of high socioeconomic status are, on average, rated as more physically attractive than people of lower status, many correlations between one partner's appearance and the other partner's status are spurious and misconstrued.

“Women spend a lot more time trying to look good than men do,” McClintock said


The Myth of Wealthy Men and Beautiful Women

"

I think this is correct.
Like guy with good salaries, but not mega rich. it doesn't help that much.

For EXAMPLE from a West nation.
This dude, is an engineer. He likely earns a salary that is TOP 10%. YET, still incel in Australia.
Luckily his income, can afford it for him to go locationmaxxing.

In that video there is no sexual tension tho, girls look like they are acting with that guy

 

[Deleted member 6341]

LEGIT

Although with money, maybe more like being top 0.05% (not 1/100 but 1/5000).

Being super rich like Musk, or some other multi-millionaire. Or being like top SatusMaxxed somewhere into like Top 0.05% orso.

Is a massive hallo.

To add though.
|The thing is. Being like TOP 10% in money/income status. Which is very good. Will do limited little.

For examples: How being "just" top 10% in money (maybe even status?) orso does little.
to quote:"
"The stereotypical example of that is known in sociology as a “beauty-status exchange”—an attractive person marries a wealthy or otherwise powerful person, and both win.

University of Notre Dame sociologist Elizabeth McClintock has done exhaustive research on the idea of people exchanging traits.

McClintock found that outside of ailing tycoons (super rich), in the practical world it basically doesn’t exist. Where it does, it doesn’t last. The dominant force in mating is matching.

What appears to be an exchange of beauty for socioeconomic status is often actually not an exchange, McClintock wrote, but a series of matched virtues. Economically successful women partner with economically successful men, and physically attractive women partner with physically attractive men.

“Sometimes you hear that really nice guys get hot girls,” McClintock told me, “[but] I found that really nice guys get really nice girls. [Being nice] is not really buying you any currency in the attractiveness realm. If the guys are hot, too, then sure, they can get a hot girl.”

Because people of high socioeconomic status are, on average, rated as more physically attractive than people of lower status, many correlations between one partner's appearance and the other partner's status are spurious and misconstrued.

“Women spend a lot more time trying to look good than men do,” McClintock said


The Myth of Wealthy Men and Beautiful Women

"

I think this is correct.
Like guy with good salaries, but not mega rich. it doesn't help that much.

For EXAMPLE from a West nation.
This dude, is an engineer. He likely earns a salary that is TOP 10%. YET, still incel in Australia.
Luckily his income, can afford it for him to go locationmaxxing.

It's because engineering is high paying but low status. I believe that even the best engineers hold less social status and influence than celebrities. Money alone will attract you golddiggers, status will create genuine sexual attraction if you're decent looking.

 

[Ampere]

It's because engineering is high paying but low status. I believe that even the best engineers hold less social status and influence than celebrities. Money alone will attract you golddiggers, status will create genuine sexual attraction if you're decent looking.

I agree with you, plus engineers don't get that much money, it's a high starting point but weak evolution.

On the other end being a doctor is a both a money and status maxx, hard af, sadly I couldn't be arsed wage studying for 10 years (in retrospective, at least I would've had girls in my class )