0hMan
germano-gaelic gaunche - modcel
Staff
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2022
- Posts
- 4,170
- Reputation
- 9,236
I think some hadiths - for example the judgement day signs, etc are correct because they don't exactly rely on exact numbers and the stories are clear. However, Hadiths are a 200 year long game of telephone, and there's a lot of stuff that goes against the idea of Muhammad (PBUH) marrying Aisha when she was 6. Hadiths aren't protected by Allah as the Quran is, so numbers could easily be messed up.This isn't a khariji mentality, and I could easily accuse you of being murjiah in your thinking; there's two sides to every coin.
I regularly speak out again "salafi" and "wahhabi" tards, but not even I would call them non-Muslims nor would they call other Muslims non-Muslims. If you think all hadiths are 'man-made' then you're a kafir. Even the most liberal Sunni/Shia/Ibadi would agree - I mean if he doesn't, is he even Muslim himself?
You talk about the shariah - there's not such thing as it without the hadiths.