My Issue with analysis formulas

[miriniqontiktok]

Whole point of analysis formulas is to be able to rate faces in a way that aligns up with IRL attraction, however here is why i find the formulas to be bad,

example

Chico scores around 7.5 if i remember correctly on the modern formulas

Hernan Drago scores around 9.3 (highest ever)

They Both are models from south america

Drago stayed a local model in Argentinia

Chico got sent world wide and turned into a supermodel


If Drago is more attractive wouldn’t this happend to him instead?


another example

Delon was spotted, and turned into europes biggest filmstar within 3 years (solely because he was good looking he didn’t even try to become a filmstar)

Apparently according to modern analysis formulas his face is about 1 out of 5k

But do 1 out of 5k faces receive this treatment?

 

[brotatoes]

Whole point of analysis formulas is to be able to rate faces in a way that aligns up with IRL attraction, however here is why i find the formulas to be bad,

example

Chico scores around 7.5 if i remember correctly on the modern formulas

Hernan Drago scores around 9.3 (highest ever)

They Both are models from south america

Drago stayed a local model in Argentinia

Chico got sent world wide and turned into a supermodel


If Drago is more attractive wouldn’t this happend to him instead?


another example

Delon was spotted, and turned into europes biggest filmstar within 3 years (solely because he was good looking he didn’t even try to become a filmstar)

Apparently according to modern analysis formulas his face is about 1 out of 5k

But do 1 out of 5k faces receive this treatment?

There's also a shit ton of external factors, as well as expecting a scale to perfectly reflect attractiveness for all people's preferences isn't realistic. Hernan drago as in your example I'd say does look better than Chico but Chico has softer yet still robust features (and could've gotten lucky) that allow him to model at the highest level. And drago is a framelet and chicos body is where he stands out as well.

 

[miriniqontiktok]

There's also a shit ton of external factors, as well as expecting a scale to perfectly reflect attractiveness for all people's preferences isn't realistic. Hernan drago as in your example I'd say does look better than Chico but Chico has softer yet still robust features (and could've gotten lucky) that allow him to model at the highest level. And drago is a framelet and chicos body is where he stands out as well.

Well yeah i tried picking cases with little external influence

 

[brotatoes]

Well yeah i tried picking cases with little external influence

Yea I mean if drago had a better frame for modeling he'd be up there, with delon he's from a slightly older generation so that could play a part as well. Delon was also just very attractive to women so he became an actor and also had the talent to act probably

 

[dogshitinfras]

How would this be relevant? Delons face is still great u have to understand how rare is 1in5k face same as chico and who knows what kinda faces modeling agencys looks for,drago also could've wanted to stay local who knows