My predictions for the future of society - HIGH IQ USERS ONLY GTFIH

FailedNormieManlet

FailedNormieManlet

NTmaxxed pajeet
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Posts
22,230
Reputation
40,039
Before we predict the future, we need to understand the present, the present society we live in.

The first premise of current society :- All structures we have are designed to maintain the status quo
The second premise of current society:- In order to maintain the status quo, obedience must be instilled in the general population
The final premise of current society:- Obedience is mainted via a grooming process.

The grooming process happens from a young age, take schools for example, where students are made to OBEY arbitary rules which make 0 sense, this is to prep them for real life, where they need to obey their boss.

In the future we are going to run a eugenics program, where only the most obedient of fetuses won't be aborted. This will be done under the guise of lowering crime. Our society is becoming more and more collectivist, there will be social campaigns where soyboys and progressives alike will be saying things like "abort your fetus, he may grow up to be a serial killer".

Think this sounds far fetched?

Let me explain. Things such as the big 5 (openess, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism) are traits which can determine the likelihood of someone being a criminal. For example those who score low on agreeableness are more likely to be criminals. In the field of bioinformatics/biology, we are currently identifying SNPs (mutations in certain genes/proteins essentially) which contribute to these big 5 traits.

Soon we will reach a point where we can identify SNPs in embryos via a screening process (similar to how we screen for down syndrome), and it will allow us to determine criminal embryos (embryos most likely to disobey the system) and only the rich and powerful will be given the freedom to have their child how they want. Essentially via this eugenics program, the perfect race of human slaves will be created.

We really need to ask ourselves. Why are scientists identifying these SNPs which cause this behaviour? What will they do with that info? Fill in the blanks.

So by making this race of humans the status quo will always be maintained. Change will never happen. The covid lockdowns were the start, they were an experiment to see how much individual freedom people were willing to give up on in order to protect the community.

It's over.

tagging

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @inferiorpispot234 @currylightskin @forevergymcelling @FrameMogger @1kisuke106
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Woah
Reactions: autistic_tendencies, BoneDensity, amorfati and 15 others
Some 1984 shit, fuark.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, FrameMogger, FailedNormieManlet and 1 other person
DNRD
 
  • JFL
Reactions: FrameMogger
Soon we will reach a point where we can identify SNPs in embryos via a screening process (similar to how we screen for down syndrome), and it will allow us to determine criminal embryos (embryos most likely to disobey the system) and only the rich and powerful will be given the freedom to have their child how they want. Essentially via this eugenics program, the perfect race of human slaves will be created.
It's over.

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @inferiorpispot234 @currylightskin @forevergymcelling @FrameMogger @1kisuke106
currently babies who are just born have their brains analyzed to find out if they are born with a disorder and they are registered for later
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger and Deleted member 16275
  • +1
Reactions: ItsOVERBuddyBoyos, FrameMogger and Deleted member 16275
final stage of the jewpill is realising how mass noncompliance truly is the only way out but that’ll never work in this day and age :feelswhy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, FrameMogger and FailedNormieManlet
@disillusioned 1984?
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger
>high iq thread high iq users only
>tagging @currylightskin

Choose one
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 19997, Deleted member 17311, currylightskin and 1 other person
I didn't read, can you summarise?
 
I want designer babies to be a thing but the fact they can select certain traits for designer babies in the future scares me. They can create a literally slave race solely through biological manipulation, there's no chance of ever coming back from that. Humans become cattle whose only worth is as the workhorses and sex slaves of elites.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and FailedNormieManlet
I want designer babies to be a thing but the fact they can select certain traits for designer babies in the future scares me. They can create a literally slave race solely through biological manipulation, there's no chance of ever coming back from that.
The slave race is being created, the more collectivist people become, the more we descend into slavery. People are willing to wear masks and stay indoors all day to protect some old people, would it really be a stretch for these same people to abort their baby if there is a high chance they are a criminal/disobedient?
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur and fauxfox
The slave race is being created, the more collectivist people become, the more we descend into slavery. People are willing to wear masks and stay indoors all day to protect some old people, would it really be a stretch for these same people to abort their baby if there is a high chance they are a criminal/disobedient?
I wouldn't be surprised, humans can be conditioned to do anything really.
This might sound schizo but I think porn and anime/waifus/loveable fiction characters were purposefully introduced to be a sexual outlet for men and to stave off incel riots/violence.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, Gaia262 and FailedNormieManlet
Put some bold letters for the important things or something im not reading that.
 
nice thread,

also another thing why the dating market is fuckedup rn:
a guy has a high ''status'' when he fucks alot of girls because thats ''cool:cool:'',
but in the eyes of guys a girl is more valuable when alot of guys want to LTR her

so yeah datingmarket is screwed because people dont want to ruin their own ''status''
 
  • +1
Reactions: FailedNormieManlet and FrameMogger
not even half a sentence had any merit tbh
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: FrameMogger
Before we predict the future, we need to understand the present, the present society we live in.

The first premise of current society :- All structures we have are designed to maintain the status quo
The second premise of current society:- In order to maintain the status quo, obedience must be instilled in the general population
The final premise of current society:- Obedience is mainted via a grooming process.

The grooming process happens from a young age, take schools for example, where students are made to OBEY arbitary rules which make 0 sense, this is to prep them for real life, where they need to obey their boss.

In the future we are going to run a eugenics program, where only the most obedient of fetuses won't be aborted. This will be done under the guise of lowering crime. Our society is becoming more and more collectivist, there will be social campaigns where soyboys and progressives alike will be saying things like "abort your fetus, he may grow up to be a serial killer".

Think this sounds far fetched?

Let me explain. Things such as the big 5 (openess, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism) are traits which can determine the likelihood of someone being a criminal. For example those who score low on agreeableness are more likely to be criminals. In the field of bioinformatics/biology, we are currently identifying SNPs (mutations in certain genes/proteins essentially) which contribute to these big 5 traits.

Soon we will reach a point where we can identify SNPs in embryos via a screening process (similar to how we screen for down syndrome), and it will allow us to determine criminal embryos (embryos most likely to disobey the system) and only the rich and powerful will be given the freedom to have their child how they want. Essentially via this eugenics program, the perfect race of human slaves will be created.

We really need to ask ourselves. Why are scientists identifying these SNPs which cause this behaviour? What will they do with that info? Fill in the blanks.

So by making this race of humans the status quo will always be maintained. Change will never happen. The covid lockdowns were the start, they were an experiment to see how much individual freedom people were willing to give up on in order to protect the community.

It's over.

tagging

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @inferiorpispot234 @currylightskin @forevergymcelling @FrameMogger @1kisuke106
We might select for other traits as well such as iq and looks and industriousness. However polymorphisms aren’t entirely accurate at the moment and I believe they can only predict traits with 50 percent accuracy at best atm.

However once methods are perfected, we could see secret desires by the rich to select for obedient people. However there is a large environmental aspect to obedience as well and overly authoritarian environments ironically breed rebellious attitudes. Also a huge group of people would oppose such eugenical policies so I dont think it could become mainstream. There's a reason why Biden ended COVID measures, mainly to boost his approval ratings. Deep down all humans hate to be controlled and will rebel.

Thus I am optimistic for the future and dont believe an obedient slave based society emanating from eugenically policies will happen. But I am certainly not ruling out the possibility.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: FailedNormieManlet and Lars
We might select for other traits as well such as iq and looks and industriousness. However polymorphisms aren’t entirely accurate at the moment and I believe they can only predict traits with 50 percent accuracy at best atm.

However once methods are perfected, we could see secret desires by the rich to select for obedient people. However there is a large environmental aspect to obedience as well and overly authoritarian environments ironically breed rebellious attitudes. Also a huge group of people would oppose such eugenically policies so I dont think it could become mainstream. There's a reason why Biden ended COVID measures, mainly to boost his approval ratings. Deep down all humans hate to be controlled and will rebel.

Thus I am optimistic for the future and dont believe an obedient slave based society emanating from eugenically policies will happen. But I am certainly not ruling out the possibility.
or become rich and have a good influence in this shit:cool::cool::cool:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: FrameMogger
or become rich and have a good influence in this shit:cool::cool::cool:
Moneypill once again moggs lookspill.

If you are rich enough you can have a harem of genetically engineered hyper obedient giga Stacies in the future potentially.

Even gigachad cannot have that
 
Moneypill once again moggs lookspill.

If you are rich enough you can have a harem of genetically engineered hyper obedient giga Stacies in the future potentially.

Even gigachad cannot have that
bro when i am billionaire maxxed i am gonna become the fucking president of the Nethlerlands by paying out of my own money to help all the people that are having it bad, i came from nothing and if i am at the top, i want everyone to give a change. i want to make the world a better place i dont care about billions if i already have a good fucking life
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: ItsOVERBuddyBoyos, FailedNormieManlet and FrameMogger
Why do you think so.
assessment of the present is dumb. conditioning for society is nothing new and is necessary.

the technologies being discussed are still way way out if possible at all. then eradication of defects is somehow framed as a bad thing (lmao?)

finally retarded link to covid that makes no sense and makes me question if op can count to ten by himself. the pandemic was just a social experiment bro :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3946 and FrameMogger
bro when i am billionaire maxxed i am gonna become the fucking president of the Nethlerlands by paying out of my own money to help all the people that are having it bad, i came from nothing and if i am at the top, i want everyone to give a change. i want to make the world a better place i dont care about billions if i already have a good fucking life
Nice, what's your plan to get rich.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lars
Nice, what's your plan to get rich.
multiple plans, i have a plan this few years to become milionaire than i have a plan to become a bilionaire, only thing i am sharing you rn is getting famous because of my looks and goofy personality to get a community
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: AlexanderTheGreat and FrameMogger
It's hard to predict just what the future of Looks Theory and what the BlackPill can uncover. Looks is everything as we all know. Predicting the future is notoriously unreliable in any discipline however, and futurists are often the butt of jokes.
Let's just start of with what we have RIGHT NOW. In 2000 and 22:

Most senior morphers can subconsciously convert PSL rating guide to percentile and work with both for a morph and there are recent efforts to standardize units and scales as certain accuracy benchmarks is mission critical for various metrics and I suppose it factor those units may find their way into performance targets. Essentially made to measure.

It's certainly a lot more technical than the old days. I've heard some specialist morphers under timed conditions have been shown to have morph control under 0.1 PSL ticks. That fidelity is basically similar to "norwooding a few mm" or a few hundred microns in certain key areas. That's what is under control and can be delivered in real time.

I remember the days when you told the fella to touch up your pic or draw you into a 5 or 6 outta 10 - and they'd have a go at getting near it. Now adjusting at a granularity under 0.1 PSL is available to the aspiring looksmaxer customer.

Just on the forums? At any given time there are 5 looks "raters" "in rooster" on the forum in a secret area. In order to minimize bias, each rater is require to not view any human faces for at least a three days, ideally a week so ratings are not subconsciously cloud from bits of short term memory. After usually about 6 to 15* (depends) weeks the rooster is swapped with a fresh set of looks theorists who do the same again. Some take ice baths which have shown benefit.
Look how far ahead of the curve we are over the normalfag.

Just in the near future:
The most exciting of all is the the hushed talk about meetings with between senior morphers and Big Guys - the maxillofacial surgeons. Morphers generally know "surgeon speak" and each profession can inform and learn from the other. I know at least one morpher has is reorganizing his basement, taking his anime out for more space, and getting a professional to install a sunlightblocker that blocked 99.9% of off putting natural light. Surgery directly from a morph should be much more accurate and safe once the two system are integrated.

Anyway, I'm veering into idle speculation now. However, the future of looks theory is looking ever bright, and the tech of today will one day be looked back upon as an endearingly stodgy piece of ancient technology... every step we make, however small, we become closer to neural networks that can learn all arrangements are your "ideal morphs" that humans miss.
Then step into the place as the fully automated state of the art looks maxer 3000 starts to work at near nano level while the PSL meter reading slowly increases to the magic number - 8 (outta 10 naturally)- and you're done as you leave the room an inconceivably improved version of the person who walked in.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lars and FrameMogger
multiple plans, i have a plan this few years to become milionaire than i have a plan to become a bilionaire, only thing i am sharing you rn is getting famous because of my looks and goofy personality to get a community
Good luck brother. Make the Netherlands great
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Lars
It's hard to predict just what the future of Looks Theory and what the BlackPill can uncover. Looks is everything as we all know. Predicting the future is notoriously unreliable in any discipline however, and futurists are often the butt of jokes.
Let's just start of with what we have RIGHT NOW. In 2000 and 22:

Most senior morphers can subconsciously convert PSL rating guide to percentile and work with both for a morph there are recent efforts to standardize units and scales as certain accuracy benchmarks is mission critical for various metrics and I suppose it factor those units may find their way into performance targets.

It's certainly a lot more technical than the old days. I've heard some specialist morphers under timed conditions have been shown to have morph control under 0.1 PSL ticks. That fidelity is basically similar to "norwooding a few mm" or a few hundred microns in certain key areas. That's what is under control and can be delivered in real time.

I remember the days when you told the fella to touch up your pic or draw you into a 5 or 6 outta 10 - and they'd have a go at getting near it. Now adjusting at a granularity under 0.1 PSL is available to the aspiring looksmaxer customer.

Just on the forums? At any given time there are 5 looks "raters" "in rooster" on the forum in a secret area. In order to minimize bias, each rater is require to not view any human faces for at least a three days, ideally a week so ratings are not subconsciously cloud from bits of short term memory. After usually about 6 to 15* (depends) weeks the rooster is swapped with a fresh set of looks theorists who do the same again. Some take ice baths which have shown benefit.
Look how far ahead of the curve we are over the normalfag.

Just in the near future:
The most exciting of all is the the hushed talk about meetings with between senior morphers and Big Guys - the maxillofacial surgeons. Morphers generally know "surgeon speak" and each profession can inform and learn from the other. I know at least one morpher has is reorganizing his basement, taking his anime out for more space, and getting a professional to install a sunlightblocker that blocked 99.9% of off putting natural light. Surgery directly from a morph should be much more accurate and safe once the two system are integrated.

Anyway, I'm veering into idle speculation now. However, the future of looks theory is looking ever bright, and the tech of today will one day be looked back upon as an endearingly stodgy piece of ancient technology... every step we make, however small, we become closer to neural networks that can learn all arrangements are your "ideal morphs" that humans miss.
Then step into the place as the fully automated state of the art looks maxer 3000 starts to work at near nano level while the PSL meter reading slowly increases to the magic number - 8 (outta 10 naturally)- and you're done as you leave the room an inconceivably improved version of the person who walked in.
inspiring thanks. bookmarked
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger
Before we predict the future, we need to understand the present, the present society we live in.

The first premise of current society :- All structures we have are designed to maintain the status quo
The second premise of current society:- In order to maintain the status quo, obedience must be instilled in the general population
The final premise of current society:- Obedience is mainted via a grooming process.

The grooming process happens from a young age, take schools for example, where students are made to OBEY arbitary rules which make 0 sense, this is to prep them for real life, where they need to obey their boss.

In the future we are going to run a eugenics program, where only the most obedient of fetuses won't be aborted. This will be done under the guise of lowering crime. Our society is becoming more and more collectivist, there will be social campaigns where soyboys and progressives alike will be saying things like "abort your fetus, he may grow up to be a serial killer".

Think this sounds far fetched?

Let me explain. Things such as the big 5 (openess, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism) are traits which can determine the likelihood of someone being a criminal. For example those who score low on agreeableness are more likely to be criminals. In the field of bioinformatics/biology, we are currently identifying SNPs (mutations in certain genes/proteins essentially) which contribute to these big 5 traits.

Soon we will reach a point where we can identify SNPs in embryos via a screening process (similar to how we screen for down syndrome), and it will allow us to determine criminal embryos (embryos most likely to disobey the system) and only the rich and powerful will be given the freedom to have their child how they want. Essentially via this eugenics program, the perfect race of human slaves will be created.

We really need to ask ourselves. Why are scientists identifying these SNPs which cause this behaviour? What will they do with that info? Fill in the blanks.

So by making this race of humans the status quo will always be maintained. Change will never happen. The covid lockdowns were the start, they were an experiment to see how much individual freedom people were willing to give up on in order to protect the community.

It's over.

tagging

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @inferiorpispot234 @currylightskin @forevergymcelling @FrameMogger @1kisuke106
Seems like this will actually be a reality in 50 years from now
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity, FrameMogger and FailedNormieManlet
not even half a sentence had any merit tbh
assessment of the present is dumb. conditioning for society is nothing new and is necessary.

the technologies being discussed are still way way out if possible at all. then eradication of defects is somehow framed as a bad thing (lmao?)

finally retarded link to covid that makes no sense and makes me question if op can count to ten by himself. the pandemic was just a social experiment bro :ROFLMAO:
How does anything you've said countered what I have said? You've just framed shit differently, the crux of the post isn't about the morality of the actions in the future, but about what will happen.

If you seriously think the pandemic did not set a new standard you are naive. Maintaining the status quo is in the best interest of society.

The technology discussed is maybe 100 years away? That's not that far in the grand scale of things
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and FrameMogger
How does anything you've said countered what I have said? You've just framed shit differently, the crux of the post isn't about the morality of the actions in the future, but about what will happen.

If you seriously think the pandemic did not set a new standard you are naive. Maintaining the status quo is in the best interest of society.

The technology discussed is maybe 100 years away? That's not that far in the grand scale of things
I've framed it correctly

If maintaining the status quo is so important why are you predicting radical changes? mirin inability to spot basic contradictions

And you are naive if you think COVID lockdowns were anything more than governments best response to a healthcare emergency. They haven't suddenly got access to new authoritarian powers lmfao
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger
I've framed it correctly

If maintaining the status quo is so important why are you predicting radical changes? mirin inability to spot basic contradictions

And you are naive if you think COVID lockdowns were anything more than governments best response to a healthcare emergency. They haven't suddenly got access to new authoritarian powers lmfao
Jfl, maintaining the status quo as in maintaining who is on top and who is on bottom. Society would collapse if we didn't have a slave class/class of people who OBEYED. The entire system works on obedience.

These radical changes will ensure more people will obey, more people are obedient and thus society is preserved at the cost of our freedom.

Mirin your low IQ and reading things at face value.

COVID lockdowns did give gov't powers, look at the UK. For example the policing bill which got passed which bans protests if they are too chaotic, this was passed down during lockdown under the guise of protecting the public.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and FrameMogger
Jfl, maintaining the status quo as in maintaining who is on top and who is on bottom. Society would collapse if we didn't have a slave class/class of people who OBEYED. The entire system works on obedience.

These radical changes will ensure more people will obey, more people are obedient and thus society is preserved at the cost of our freedom.

Mirin your low IQ and reading things at face value.

COVID lockdowns did give gov't powers, look at the UK. For example the policing bill which got passed which bans protests if they are too chaotic, this was passed down during lockdown under the guise of protecting the public.
That tends to happen anyway because of generational wealth, education and environment growing up

I still fail to see why this isn't ideal. Society runs very smoothly and everyone is happy. Your only arguments are appealing to emotions

I loved that bill, most protestors are extremely retarded and get all riled up about shit they don't understand. I think it does protect the public tbh
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger and FailedNormieManlet
That tends to happen anyway because of generational wealth, education and environment growing up

I still fail to see why this isn't ideal. Society runs very smoothly and everyone is happy. Your only arguments are appealing to emotions

I loved that bill, most protestors are extremely retarded and get all riled up about shit they don't understand. I think it does protect the public tbh
Yes but if people were to disobey, demand better conditions, form unions and whatnot, this would disrupt the status quo - which the higher ups don't want. What's best for society isn't what's best for the individual, and so even if things were "running smoothly" this is not ideal for the individual.

Protestors are retarded yes, but there really shouldn't be a ban on protests.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and FrameMogger
Yes but if people were to disobey, demand better conditions, form unions and whatnot, this would disrupt the status quo - which the higher ups don't want. What's best for society isn't what's best for the individual, and so even if things were "running smoothly" this is not ideal for the individual.

Protestors are retarded yes, but there really shouldn't be a ban on protests.
Who tf are 'the higher ups". Ngl you sound a bit like one of the schizos blaming the Jews for everything. Wealthy people aren't all friends and do not share the same political views.

What's best for society is what's best for the most individuals without fucking over any individuals unless they deserve it.

It's not a ban on protests it just allows the police to intervene when they're being massive cunts. Ironically people didn't understand this and protested against the bill 😂

 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger and FailedNormieManlet
Who tf are 'the higher ups". Ngl you sound a bit like one of the schizos blaming the Jews for everything. Wealthy people aren't all friends and do not share the same political views.

What's best for society is what's best for the most individuals without fucking over any individuals unless they deserve it.

It's not a ban on protests it just allows the police to intervene when they're being massive cunts. Ironically people didn't understand this and protested against the bill 😂

The people on the top of society, powerful politicians and the rich yes.

Okay so if you had a rare condition but treatment was expensive so the NHS did not help you, because that money could be used to help more people out with a common condition which had cheap treatment. You think that therefore means that by preserving the group/looking for the best interests of the group, you as an individual without treatment benefit? :feelsuhh:

Just lol at the low IQ. PROTESTS ARE MEANT TO ANNOY :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and FrameMogger
The people on the top of society, powerful politicians and the rich yes.

Okay so if you had a rare condition but treatment was expensive so the NHS did not help you, because that money could be used to help more people out with a common condition which had cheap treatment. You think that therefore means that by preserving the group/looking for the best interests of the group, you as an individual without treatment benefit? :feelsuhh:

Just lol at the low IQ. PROTESTS ARE MEANT TO ANNOY :lul:
They aren't all friends and have different political views.

If it's my life vs the lives of several others then yeah that's what's best for society

They are meant to make a point. Disruptive protests are a symptom of nobody agreeing with your cause. so you need to do something extreme for attention.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger and FailedNormieManlet
They aren't all friends and have different political views.

If it's my life vs the lives of several others then yeah that's what's best for society

They are meant to make a point. Disruptive protests are a symptom of nobody agreeing with your cause. so you need to do something extreme for attention.
You stated what's best for society is best for the individual, if that is the case, then your life being thrown away to save others is what's best for you?

Even if the cause is unpopular, they should have the freedom to express that opinion
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and FrameMogger
You stated what's best for society is best for the individual, if that is the case, then your life being thrown away to save others is what's best for you?

Even if the cause is unpopular, they should have the freedom to express that opinion
No I didn't, read my post again.

Yeah but not disrupt people's lives.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger
No I didn't, read my post again.

Yeah but not disrupt people's lives.
jfl you edited it. But that's besides the point, what's best for society isn't best for the individual. I care about the rights and lives of the individual and thus think the future I described is dystopian
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity and FrameMogger
jfl you edited it. But that's besides the point, what's best for society isn't best for the individual. I care about the rights and lives of the individual and thus think the future I described is dystopian
I never edited

So do I and that's why I think the speculated future is ideal for everyone
 
Jfl this seems like the plot to some dystopian future anime.

I hope if this happens, its only when im dead. Cause I'd try to act like the main character and stop them, But then as I reach my demise and finally realize that I was just another side character
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger and FailedNormieManlet
Jfl this seems like the plot to some dystopian future anime.

I hope if this happens, its only when im dead. Cause I'd try to act like the main character and stop them, But then as I reach my demise and finally realize that I was just another side character
Would be a good anime ngl, I just need to write the book and I’ll finally be rich
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger and Deleted member 16853
  • Love it
Reactions: FailedNormieManlet
We might select for other traits as well such as iq and looks and industriousness. However polymorphisms aren’t entirely accurate at the moment and I believe they can only predict traits with 50 percent accuracy at best atm.

However once methods are perfected, we could see secret desires by the rich to select for obedient people. However there is a large environmental aspect to obedience as well and overly authoritarian environments ironically breed rebellious attitudes. Also a huge group of people would oppose such eugenical policies so I dont think it could become mainstream. There's a reason why Biden ended COVID measures, mainly to boost his approval ratings. Deep down all humans hate to be controlled and will rebel.

Thus I am optimistic for the future and dont believe an obedient slave based society emanating from eugenically policies will happen. But I am certainly not ruling out the possibility.
Blasian master race I can see it already. Black body Asian brain, white or Mullato face

It will be a sight to behold the pinnacle of humanity
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrameMogger
Before we predict the future, we need to understand the present, the present society we live in.

The first premise of current society :- All structures we have are designed to maintain the status quo
The second premise of current society:- In order to maintain the status quo, obedience must be instilled in the general population
The final premise of current society:- Obedience is mainted via a grooming process.

The grooming process happens from a young age, take schools for example, where students are made to OBEY arbitary rules which make 0 sense, this is to prep them for real life, where they need to obey their boss.

In the future we are going to run a eugenics program, where only the most obedient of fetuses won't be aborted. This will be done under the guise of lowering crime. Our society is becoming more and more collectivist, there will be social campaigns where soyboys and progressives alike will be saying things like "abort your fetus, he may grow up to be a serial killer".

Think this sounds far fetched?

Let me explain. Things such as the big 5 (openess, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism) are traits which can determine the likelihood of someone being a criminal. For example those who score low on agreeableness are more likely to be criminals. In the field of bioinformatics/biology, we are currently identifying SNPs (mutations in certain genes/proteins essentially) which contribute to these big 5 traits.

Soon we will reach a point where we can identify SNPs in embryos via a screening process (similar to how we screen for down syndrome), and it will allow us to determine criminal embryos (embryos most likely to disobey the system) and only the rich and powerful will be given the freedom to have their child how they want. Essentially via this eugenics program, the perfect race of human slaves will be created.

We really need to ask ourselves. Why are scientists identifying these SNPs which cause this behaviour? What will they do with that info? Fill in the blanks.

So by making this race of humans the status quo will always be maintained. Change will never happen. The covid lockdowns were the start, they were an experiment to see how much individual freedom people were willing to give up on in order to protect the community.

It's over.

tagging

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @inferiorpispot234 @currylightskin @forevergymcelling @FrameMogger @1kisuke106
I definitely agree with society becoming more conformist, however I don't think eugenics will be used to achieve this.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity
Before we predict the future, we need to understand the present, the present society we live in.

The first premise of current society :- All structures we have are designed to maintain the status quo
The second premise of current society:- In order to maintain the status quo, obedience must be instilled in the general population
The final premise of current society:- Obedience is mainted via a grooming process.

The grooming process happens from a young age, take schools for example, where students are made to OBEY arbitary rules which make 0 sense, this is to prep them for real life, where they need to obey their boss.

In the future we are going to run a eugenics program, where only the most obedient of fetuses won't be aborted. This will be done under the guise of lowering crime. Our society is becoming more and more collectivist, there will be social campaigns where soyboys and progressives alike will be saying things like "abort your fetus, he may grow up to be a serial killer".

Think this sounds far fetched?

Let me explain. Things such as the big 5 (openess, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism) are traits which can determine the likelihood of someone being a criminal. For example those who score low on agreeableness are more likely to be criminals. In the field of bioinformatics/biology, we are currently identifying SNPs (mutations in certain genes/proteins essentially) which contribute to these big 5 traits.

Soon we will reach a point where we can identify SNPs in embryos via a screening process (similar to how we screen for down syndrome), and it will allow us to determine criminal embryos (embryos most likely to disobey the system) and only the rich and powerful will be given the freedom to have their child how they want. Essentially via this eugenics program, the perfect race of human slaves will be created.

We really need to ask ourselves. Why are scientists identifying these SNPs which cause this behaviour? What will they do with that info? Fill in the blanks.

So by making this race of humans the status quo will always be maintained. Change will never happen. The covid lockdowns were the start, they were an experiment to see how much individual freedom people were willing to give up on in order to protect the community.

It's over.

tagging

@PrinceLuenLeoncur @inferiorpispot234 @currylightskin @forevergymcelling @FrameMogger @1kisuke106
Why wasn't I tagged?
 

Similar threads

enchanted_elixir
Replies
145
Views
3K
superboy
superboy
Gmogger
Replies
211
Views
4K
AustrianMogger
AustrianMogger
Nazi Germany
Replies
32
Views
1K
(In)CelibatePsycho2
I
irrumator praetor
Replies
33
Views
2K
HandsomeTwink420
HandsomeTwink420

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top