MY RATING scale

[DoII]

 

[LooksThinker]

I´m 9

 

[Deleted member 27750]

if those guys are 6 psl in chart

im 9

 

[Deleted member 44964]

Worst rating scale I’ve ever seen

 

[DrTony]

View attachment 2532438

It doesn’t matter what your rating scale is.

Women have binary interest in men. There are no gradations. It’s either a yes or no. Also there is a tremendous variability in their taste in so much so that part of the reason why 90/10 is legit is more so a reflection of the huge variance in female preference making any one man very unlikely to be the exact taste of the majority of women. Us men have way more agreement on what female we find attractive.

Ultimately your rating is determined by real life outcomes. Not imaginary scales. Like P in V outcomes in a given timeframe determines your rating (and the quality of them as well)

 

[DoII]

Worst rating scale I’ve ever seen

Let’s see yours

 

[Deleted member 44964]

Let’s see yours

My rating scale is if someone looks better than me they are chadlite

 

[DoII]

My rating scale is if someone looks better than me they are chadlite

Narcy type shit

 

[Deleted member 44964]

Narcy type shit

How is that narcy my ratings are very accurate

 

[eduardkoopman]

Women have binary interest in men. There are no gradations. It’s either a yes or no.

I largely agree. With 1 nuance.
I think the "interest" rating of women is, like this:
1. yes!
2. yes, IF he also has .... (or some call it "maybe")
3. no!

Maybe it's best a dude, to reject a woman. When she giving you an chance, in the way as under number 2. You'll lose as a dude in such a relationship, if the woman is decently savage and calculated.

Also there is a tremendous variability in their taste in so much so that part of the reason why 90/10 is legit is more so a reflection of the huge variance in female preference making any one man very unlikely to be the exact taste of the majority of women. Us men have way more agreement on what female we find attractive.

it's a bit strange though, that women do tend to end up all trying to date, or dating, the same dude(s). That would think, they are not as variant.
But I also know, studies say and show, taht women have quit high variance. And that even a dude looking like a woman in the face because lacks masculinity, can be liked by plenty women. Whereas I doubt, that any dude likes a masculine face woman.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...GFnZSI6Il9kaXJlY3QiLCJwYWdlIjoiX2RpcmVjdCJ9fQ

Ultimately your rating is determined by real life outcomes. Not imaginary scales. Like P in V outcomes in a given timeframe determines your rating (and the quality of them as well)

quality probably says more than quantity. But that is truely your only way to rate SMV.

 

[DoII]

B

 

[DoII]

@FunkyFlamingo @LooksThinker

 

[Crayola CØck]

Almost all of them are subhumans, so ranking them by numbers is a waste of time.

Might as well have made 2 categories: one for nearly every guy (uggos), & another for the 5 that are actually half decent or HTN+.

 

[LooksThinker]

@FunkyFlamingo @LooksThinker

I´m like 10psl compared to those guys

 

[Deleted member 25743]

6 in mumbai