My sisters just called alfredo d la cruz ugly and a bird

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

foids are the most ragebaiters of the history

 

[cytoplasm]

Are they wrong though

 

[ltnwhiteboy]

foids are the most ragebaiters of the history

Their @?

 

[TestoMaxxer]

She most be joking

 

[primal_shitmuncher]

one of my fem friends back in middle school said prime Dylan O' Brien was 4/10

He's no Chad, but he's not a fuckin 4/10.

 

[NoxInfernum]

Thee people Never listen an foids word. They may not call a shot in the mouth, but they're always the ones spreading legs when they see a Chad.

 

[pfl]

Are they wrong though

 

[sonic55555]

is she deadass rn

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

She most be joking

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

Yeah its mostly cope, idk why women lie a lot

 

[whiteegyptian]

that's because he is

 

[6’7whitechad]

If thats ugly we should all rope

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

that's because he is

How

 

[bakpaokukus]

jfl why did you react like how muslims react when Muhammad gets insulted over it?

 

[whiteegyptian]

How

structurally narrow mandible, and tapers sharply inward, his eyes show notable lower eyelid exposure and slight flatness right beneath the lower rim, indicating good but obviously not flawless orbital support, narrow cheek-bones, tapered and narrow chin pad. his angularity is not that elite.

and his harmony is messed up, bad neck width proportions, shit fwhr, trash eye aspect ratio, mid face ratio is ass, as his middle third is squashed vertically.

he's ugly as fuck.

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

and his harmony is messed up, bad neck width proportions, shit fwhr,

Yes, they are failos

trash eye aspect ratio, mid face ratio is ass,

Nope, ear is ideal when not squinting

View attachment 5289008
structurally narrow mandible, tapered and narrow chin pad. his angularity is not .

Nope

 

[whiteegyptian]

Yes, they are failos

Nope, ear is ideal when not squinting

Nope

Ratios from Mumbai:

The horizontal ruler across his eye plane reads literally as 80.0 cm (scaling pixels to units), while the vertical line measuring his upper facial height reads 102.0 cm, JFL.


the picture you sent just proves that he has a bad mid-face ratio and FWHR.


this proves his face is vertically stretched as fuck.

 

[satangoy]

all that talk talk until she see's him out side of her phone screen

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

Ratios from Mumbai:

View attachment 5289083

The horizontal ruler across his eye plane reads literally as 80.0 cm (scaling pixels to units), while the vertical line measuring his upper facial height reads 102.0 cm, JFL.


the picture you sent just proves that he has a bad mid-face ratio and FWHR.


this proves his face is vertically stretched as fuck.

Are u retarded?

 

[whiteegyptian]

Are u retarded?

still smaller than your vertical height of 102. his harmony is just messed up to be honest.

 

[au rêve]

there is something kinda off about his midface

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

still smaller than your vertical height of 102. his harmony is just messed up to be honest.

Is ideal, his midface is 0.98, wich is ideal in the range of 0.95-1.05

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

there is something kinda off about his midface

Its ideal man, its 0.98-96, in the ideal range

 

[whiteegyptian]

Is ideal, his midface is 0.98, wich is ideal in the range of 0.95-1.05

I WILL TRY to explain it to you.

so, you are applying a vertical thirds range to a horizontal width to-height tool, your actual numbers on the screen are 80 wide by 102 tall, which equals a ratio of 0.78, since a masculine midface requires a compact ratio of 1.0 or higher, your 0.78 proves your face is mathematically long, narrow, and unideal under the criteria, got it now? or do I HAVE to repeat in a more simplified way?

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

I WILL TRY to explain it to you.

so, you are applying a vertical thirds range to a horizontal width to-height tool, your actual numbers on the screen are 80 wide by 102 tall, which equals a ratio of 0.78, since a masculine midface requires a compact ratio of 1.0 or higher, your 0.78 proves your face is mathematically long, narrow, and unideal under the criteria, got it now? or do I HAVE to repeat in a more simplified way?

Nigga its not 80 jfl its a reference of 100 i just showed u

 

[SilvioMoltisantiDan]

I WILL TRY to explain it to you.

so, you are applying a vertical thirds range to a horizontal width to-height tool, your actual numbers on the screen are 80 wide by 102 tall, which equals a ratio of 0.78, since a masculine midface requires a compact ratio of 1.0 or higher, your 0.78 proves your face is mathematically long, narrow, and unideal under the criteria, got it now? or do I HAVE to repeat in a more simplified way?

Here if i stretch the line more