Deleted member 2403
Emerald
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2019
- Posts
- 49,237
- Reputation
- 127,662
Don’t rememberYes you agree?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Don’t rememberYes you agree?
This is what i would say to Chads and TyronesChad / Tyrone lives matter
BrutalDon’t remember
i agree with this, alot.I think the best way to guarantee the best results should be a mix of 1 and 2, women can choose but in restricted pool of men, otherwise it creates too much problems.
No gender can have their mating strategy fully unregulated for the sake of society, if men are unregulated they rape, kill each other and create lot of problems, if women are unregulated then men suicide, go ER, society becomes unstable and we potentially go back to men killing and raping. The only solution is to find a way to limit both women and men desires, and that was what monogamy did.
It will get worst before it gets better.
It's time boys!True without porn and video games half of the population would rebel
Yeah, religion is outdated now tho so we will need a new force to keep us in line, maybe a technological one or dictatorial one like China.i agree with this, alot.
Religions (which are human made), all had this type of regulation for the "romantic relationships marketplace".
We can only hope boyoIt's time boys!
Let's overthrow the Chads
LMAO. or Tinder, Insta, and whole social media ban. For any dude or female with a laycount over x.Yeah, religion is outdated now tho so we will need a new force to keep us in line, maybe a technological one or dictatorial one like China.
This is what i would say to Chads and Tyrones
I don't think it will be men to do so, normies are just followers, nothing more. There will come a time when the amount of babies born will be too low and the men commitment towards society too.LMAO. or Tinder, Insta, and whole social media ban. For any dude or female with a laycount over x.
Joking aside. Women have taken control of the dating market place, and men are to weak, unorganised or whatever; to use their superior fighting and control skills to set the frame-work in the way most men want it.
So women hold most the power. And women choice this. I see no reason, why this would change any time soon. Dudes look way to soy nowadays, to be able to fight.
Blackpilled people should all work together, never understood why incels want to stay alone, this situation benefits Chads only and as long as the agepill don't destroy them, and in general having only looks as a weapon to compete and to keep a woman to yourself is super stressfull and works only in your prime years.We can't work together with normies & incels?
This made me lolThis is false incel. It was because only around 1 out of 17 men had good personalities back then. Also showers were alot less common back then and very few men had access to them.
Agreed I’ve always said Chads & incels should make peace & work together. I understand the resentment they have but none of us are in control of our genetics. .Co would never agree with thisI don't think it will be men to do so, normies are just followers, nothing more. There will come a time when the amount of babies born will be too low and the men commitment towards society too.
A dictator will then take place and ban all those apps that will be deemed as degenerate and monogamy will be reintroduced and enforced again, since we can't import 3rd wordlers forever.
This, or we just go exctint, but i can't see men following the rules when there will not be many people to enforce them.
Blackpilled people should all work together, never understood why incels want to stay alone, this situation benefits Chads only and as long as the agepill don't destroy them, and in general having only looks as a weapon to compete and to keep a woman to yourself is super stressfull and works only in your prime years.
Hard to predict, what will happen. so many uncertain factorsI don't think it will be men to do so, normies are just followers, nothing more. There will come a time when the amount of babies born will be too low and the men commitment towards society too.
A dictator will then take place and ban all those apps that will be deemed as degenerate and monogamy will be reintroduced and enforced again, since we can't import 3rd wordlers forever.
This, or we just go exctint, but i can't see men following the rules when there will not be many people to enforce them.
Thanks manHigh IQ, good post as usual.
Shut up faggot nobody likes you
Rape is based and should be legal and encourageddamn so rape is a chad move
Unironically rape is the only evolutionary pressure women have. In lot of species, like some type of bite, women evolved to fight rape, in humans tho the only evolution they had was to enjoy rape, have an orgasm and an ovulation.Rape is based and should be legal and encouraged
I was mostly talking about cavemen, not early agricultural communities where the 17:1 applies. Cavemen did face more natural selection as they were the ones who had to hunt dangerous animals that could kill and maim them while women just collected berries. Men also are more careless and do crazier shit that could get them killed while women tend to be more careful. Child mortality and disease also disproportionately impacts men compared to women. Also if there were any threats to the tribe it was largely the men who had to face it. Also, I guess I counted intraspecific competition as a type of natural selection.
Based cavemen tbhCavemen killed a higher amount of female infants though to keep the population growth at a steady level because resources were scarce.