My thoughts on sexual dimorphism/female hypergamy

[GuyFromSingapore]

Female hypergamy will create more sexually attractive, more masculine males in the future.

Now to the nitty gritty...

Men and women look similar to each other but different. They don't look similar enough to be confused for each other but they not different enough to be seen as different species.

Are women just "feminine humans" and men "masculine humans"?

When you look at dogs or cats you can't tell males apart from from females untill you look at their genitals. But can a male cat tell apart a female cat just by looking at it's facial bones?

If you look at transgender women and men you can almost always tell their real gender/sex just by looking at their faces. Even after hormone therapy they still look quite masculine or feminine.

Sure hormones might influence sexual development(even face, like masculine vs feminine face) but I think it's more than just that.

How do you measure femininity? Is it an aesthetic concept/ideal?

Speaking of which do pretty boys have lower testosterone and higher estrogen than masc-ogres? Or are they sexually selected(by females) males? Coming to this point East Asia has more prettyboys(Kpop) and East Asians have the lowest levels of Testosterone.

Is femininity just an idealized beauty aesthetic? Is beauty a feminine thing or a masculine thing? Is there such a thing as "masculine beauty"?

IN CONCLUSION: Women becoming highly selective of men will result in men becoming "better looking" and "more masculine" which is a good thing!

 

[Mastermind]

Shit thread

 

[NumbThePain]

Sure, a really good thing that most average men will die alone or rope

And, women are a different species. They live a total different life

 

[Deleted member 19064]

not really. Women carry a shit ton of inferior genes and they will always be able to breed because they can always catch a dick

 

[SeiGun]

if it became purely female selection, it come a time human race evolve to became peacock like,
extremely beautiful male while shit looking female bird + entitle af to mate with even more superior male peacock

 

[Gandy]

The current Fisherian runaway in humans (post 2020s) wouldn't result in "more masculine men" because hypermasc models have very few followers and fans who are female. Most of their fans are gay males.

The males with the most Tiktok, Instagram etc. female followers are tall and masculine bodied but they have pretty faces.

Meaning they have feminine features mixed with strongly masculine ones. This type has the widest appeal to the most fertile women (age 17-25). They also have very high appeal to older women but this is irrelevant because they have a harder time producing children.

Were women to have children with better & better looking prettyboys over several generations, men wouldn't be more 'masculine', they would have even prettier faces than they do now, though they would also be taller than now and have wider frames than now.

 

[sub5inchcel]

not really. Women carry a shit ton of inferior genes and they will always be able to breed because they can always catch a dick

i tink men look more like their moom not sure

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

if it became purely female selection, it come a time human race evolve to became peacock like,
extremely beautiful male while shit looking female bird + entitle af to mate with even more superior male peacock

Possible scenario.

 

[sub5inchcel]

The current Fisherian runaway in humans (post 2020s) wouldn't result in "more masculine men" because hypermasc models have very few followers and fans who are female. Most of their fans are gay males.

The males with the most Tiktok, Instagram etc. female followers are tall and masculine bodied but they have pretty faces.

Meaning they have feminine features mixed with strongly masculine ones. This type has the widest appeal to the most fertile women (age 17-25). They also have very high appeal to older women but this is irrelevant because they have a harder time producing children.

Were women to have children with better & better looking prettyboys over several generations, men wouldn't be more 'masculine', they would have even prettier faces than they do now, though they would also be taller than now and have wider frames than now.

in balkan its other way around, also other countries like thaty

 

[Xangsane]

in balkan its other way around, also other countries like thaty

UK as well

 

[GuyFromSingapore]

The current Fisherian runaway in humans (post 2020s) wouldn't result in "more masculine men" because hypermasc models have very few followers and fans who are female. Most of their fans are gay males.

The males with the most Tiktok, Instagram etc. female followers are tall and masculine bodied but they have pretty faces.

Meaning they have feminine features mixed with strongly masculine ones. This type has the widest appeal to the most fertile women (age 17-25). They also have very high appeal to older women but this is irrelevant because they have a harder time producing children.

Were women to have children with better & better looking prettyboys over several generations, men wouldn't be more 'masculine', they would have even prettier faces than they do now, though they would also be taller than now and have wider frames than now.

Because hypermasculine/ogre males are more aggressive and raped women. So they are more threatening and unapproachable to females.

HOWEVER when you look at menstrual cycles, women prefer hypermasculine faces at their estrogen peak/most fertile.

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar...reported that women likely,(Penton-Voak et al.

 

[SeiGun]

Possible scenario.

brutal species, even chad need to clownmax to get a chance...