D
Deleted member 10913
Luminary
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2020
- Posts
- 9,100
- Reputation
- 10,594
I saw an interesting post and decided to do something similair.
looksmax.org
My beliefs
looksmax.org
I hold the view that God exist and mankind is hardwired to accept this as truth. With this I consider every theistic religion to be ´close´ on what´s the truth. In my opinion the discussion of relgion lies not with if God exist or not but wether divine intervention happened or not. I believe it did and knowledge from scriptures & prophethood compel me to hold this view. Out of the 4 holy scriptures Islam is for me the most coherent and with this I call myself a Muslim
My understanding of the Blackpill is that it's basically biological detirminism. I ascribe to this view. Most human characteristics are passed on and the quality of this is what's determine your succes. Anything of secondary value can't override something that's predetermined.
In my opinion I don't believe that the blackpill argues against religion. If biological determinism is holded as truth, the believe in God must also be. Many studies that have been done in human psychology point out that the human brain is hardwired in doing so.
looksmax.org
Atheism=cope
INFANTS are hard-wired to believe in God, and atheism has to be learned, according to an Oxford University psychologist. Dr Olivera Petrovich told a University of Western Sydney conference on the psychology of religion that even preschool children constructed theological concepts as part of...
looksmax.org
I believe that human evolution happened, however I don't think it's darwinian evolution. My main disagreement is abiogenes, The tree of life and finally the genetic comparison of the genome to that of chimps. Any part could be taken honestly and shown as 'close to mankind'. At most only 2% of the entire human genome has been measured. Nothing more.
I have no stigma against the West and personally respect the Christian aspect of it, however I believe that our civilization and the west should remain divided from each other. I don't find it appetizing to meddle in each others affairs.
idc about politics. One time I did this test and my result was leftism jfl.
Outside of pragmatism I found most of them useless. For me the value of pragmatism lies in it's efficiency. It is not 'efficient' to think everyday about wether a tree is actually a tree or not. I see something and accept it as truth until proven otherwise.
It's a cope. No state boundry can give you a better life then what your face already gives. If my forefathers where nationalistic I wouldn't be in Anatolia. Diffrent factors compelled them in the wars
They should remain close to us for we understand them and have no reason to exploit them. We come from the same Ottoman legacy, so I believe we should have close relations with each other.
Sunni Islam is the only orthodox view. Both the Shia and Wahabism are filled with fraud thinking. I still regard most of their adherents as Muslim until proven otherwise.
I found it useful but would prefer any martial art over it.
Waste of time. It's best to take information in how it's presented
I classify most of humanity in wether they believe in God or don't. I trust the ones who do for they recognize objective morality. I distrust the ones who don't for they move according to their own desires. In the end that could be anything if I am not careful even against me. Liberalism itself with all it's foolishness still recognizes this. John locke made various statements himself regarding this. According to him you can only have a convenant with the state if you are Theistic.
Last edited:
