Name one society in human history that embraced maximum equality that also flourished.

CorinthianLOX

CorinthianLOX

๐•ฏ๐–๐•ฏ ๐–ˆ๐–—๐–Š๐–œ ยท beautyiseverything
Joined
Mar 26, 2025
Posts
4,343
Reputation
8,728
title
 
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard, e1488shciozl and eternalcoper
Nazi Germany
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: eternalcoper and CorinthianLOX
Colonialism
 
  • JFL
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
  • +1
Reactions: e1488shciozl and eternalcoper
I mean maximum equality. That means that everyone is equal regardless of race, wealth, class, gender, status etc.
Im just fucking with u sillybuns:ogre:
 
  • Love it
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
Im just fucking with u sillybuns:ogre:
Let Me Go Love GIF by 3 Doors Down
 
  • Love it
Reactions: unowkn
Umar Ibn Abdul Aziz (717-720 CE)
 
i dont think there was ever one that was absolutely equal. there might as well not be binaries at that point. the closest thing is probably some random prehistoric niggas in africa
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
i dont think there was ever one that was absolutely equal. there might as well not be binaries at that point. the closest thing is probably some random prehistoric niggas in africa
Exactly. There isn't one. This is why communism isn't achievable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: e1488shciozl
Exactly. There isn't one. This is why communism isn't achievable.
if by communism u mean total equality then i agree its not achievable for conscious humans
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
if by communism u mean total equality then i agree its not achievable for conscious humans
Then why do people even think communism and ''human equality'' is a worthy endeavor?
 
  • +1
Reactions: e1488shciozl
None. Some form of hierarchy is necessary to achieve flourishing. Having a society in which the most competent people in general have more power, is more likely to have better outcomes for that society as a whole. Egalitarianism is not achievable anyways. Sure, you can alleviate it to some extent, but inequality is always going to be part of the human condition.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
None. Some form of hierarchy is necessary to achieve flourishing. Having a society in which the most competent people in general have more power, is more likely to have better outcomes for that society as a whole. Egalitarianism is not achievable anyways. Sure, you can alleviate it to some extent, but inequality is always going to be part of the human condition.
I agree. Equality is a worthless endeavor.
 
  • +1
Reactions: e1488shciozl
Then why do people even think communism and ''human equality'' is a worthy endeavor?
i think its because ppl desire a return to a state in which they were not immersed in a social strata, basically a state of symbolic absence. I believe it may actually be primal to an extent but generally emerges in response to the burdens of individualization common in contemporary societies
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
erm that's because it's never been tried yet sweaty
 
  • +1
Reactions: e1488shciozl and silently_said
@loyolaxavvierretard
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX and loyolaxavvierretard
I dont know history, explain in a sentence
Persian Empire that was known for prosperity. They allowed women to own land, conduct business, travep freely and earn equal to the work they had
 
  • +1
Reactions: e1488shciozl

Similar threads

D
Replies
8
Views
155
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
Jason Voorhees
Replies
10
Views
200
Jason Voorhees
Jason Voorhees
eternalcoper
Replies
15
Views
670
eternalcoper
eternalcoper

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top