Name one society in human history that embraced maximum equality that also flourished.

CorinthianLOX

CorinthianLOX

๐•ฏ๐–๐•ฏ ๐–ˆ๐–—๐–Š๐–œ ยท beautyiseverything
Joined
Mar 26, 2025
Posts
2,370
Reputation
4,243
title
 
  • +1
Reactions: eternalcoper
Nazi Germany
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: eternalcoper and CorinthianLOX
Colonialism
 
  • JFL
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
Im just fucking with u sillybuns:ogre:
Let Me Go Love GIF by 3 Doors Down
 
  • Love it
Reactions: unowkn
Umar Ibn Abdul Aziz (717-720 CE)
 
i dont think there was ever one that was absolutely equal. there might as well not be binaries at that point. the closest thing is probably some random prehistoric niggas in africa
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
i dont think there was ever one that was absolutely equal. there might as well not be binaries at that point. the closest thing is probably some random prehistoric niggas in africa
Exactly. There isn't one. This is why communism isn't achievable.
 
if by communism u mean total equality then i agree its not achievable for conscious humans
Then why do people even think communism and ''human equality'' is a worthy endeavor?
 
None. Some form of hierarchy is necessary to achieve flourishing. Having a society in which the most competent people in general have more power, is more likely to have better outcomes for that society as a whole. Egalitarianism is not achievable anyways. Sure, you can alleviate it to some extent, but inequality is always going to be part of the human condition.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
None. Some form of hierarchy is necessary to achieve flourishing. Having a society in which the most competent people in general have more power, is more likely to have better outcomes for that society as a whole. Egalitarianism is not achievable anyways. Sure, you can alleviate it to some extent, but inequality is always going to be part of the human condition.
I agree. Equality is a worthless endeavor.
 
Then why do people even think communism and ''human equality'' is a worthy endeavor?
i think its because ppl desire a return to a state in which they were not immersed in a social strata, basically a state of symbolic absence. I believe it may actually be primal to an extent but generally emerges in response to the burdens of individualization common in contemporary societies
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
erm that's because it's never been tried yet sweaty
 
  • +1
Reactions: silently_said

Similar threads

D
Replies
8
Views
129
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
Jason Voorhees
Replies
10
Views
177
Jason Voorhees
Jason Voorhees
eternalcoper
Replies
15
Views
501
eternalcoper
eternalcoper
NorwoodAscender
Replies
15
Views
896
BonesmashFinalBoss
BonesmashFinalBoss
Palang
Replies
8
Views
110
Palang
Palang

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top