NASA Perseverance lands on mars..

MrGlutton

MrGlutton

interesting.....
Joined
May 24, 2019
Posts
10,675
Reputation
19,288
Quite remarkable honestly.

they've successfully landed a robot on that dead planet to detect whatever or not life existed on it.

everything is proceeding as I've foreseen, and at an accelerated rate.


NASA just has the budget of a large cap company. IMAGINE if they had the military budget? The amount of advancements that we would undergo...

The United States of America is one of the most retarded nations to have ever existed. :confused:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 10913, Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 9779 and 16 others
Space is fake and the earth is flat, we aren't hurtling through space
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: StacyRepellent, cornerd nerd, Deleted member 9344 and 17 others
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7125, Deleted member 4612 and Deleted member 4804
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8461, Deleted member 7125, Deleted member 9344 and 9 others
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Lasko123, Deleted member 9779, UltimateMan and 5 others
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7125, Deleted member 4804 and MrGlutton
prove it the other way nigger
u ever heard of newtons law of gravitation or keplers laws of planetary motion? cuz if the earth is somehow flat, then that means gravity doesnt exist either
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7125, Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 4804 and 3 others
u ever heard of newtons/hookes law of gravitation? cuz if the earth is somehow flat, then that means gravity doesnt exist either
correct, gravity is a theory. look it up
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10602, Uglybrazilian, Mouthbreath and 2 others
correct, gravity is a theory. look it up
u have no idea what 'theory' means within scientific literature, very diff from the colloquial usage

dont talk abt shit u know nothing abt
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 10602, Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 7125 and 11 others
space exploration is waste of time and money
 
  • +1
Reactions: ThatDjangoWalk and Deleted member 4612
We about to colonize mars but we still don't have a cure for balding smh.

its over for baldingcels
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 9779, Deleted member 5969, homo_faber and 6 others
u have no idea what 'theory' means within scientific literature, very diff from the colloquial usage

dont talk abt shit u know nothing abt
hahahhahahahh

you dont either

you cant "prove" gravity exists
 
  • Love it
Reactions: AlwaysHaveQuestions and OOGABOOGA
u have no idea what 'theory' means within scientific literature, very diff from the colloquial usage

dont talk abt shit u know nothing abt
I can't believe people here think he is high IQ jfl
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7125, Deleted member 9003, Mouthbreath and 3 others
Space is fake and the earth is flat, we aren't hurtling through space
^reminder that these are the ""high iq"" knowledgeable looksmaxxers that everyone on the forum worships and takes advice from

hahahhahahahh

you dont either

you cant "prove" gravity exists
if im falling for bait, then i am indeed autistic asf

if not, kys u peabrained retard lmfao. whats your idea of proof? you dont even have the background to understand any of the theories, so why should they be explained to u? go sit in on an intro to physics class lol
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7125, Deleted member 5180, WadlowMaxxing and 2 others
^reminder that these are the ""high iq"" knowledgeable looksmaxxers that everyone on the forum worships and takes advice from


if im falling for bait, then i am indeed autistic asf

if not, kys u peabrained retard lmfao. whats your idea of proof? you dont even have the background to understand any of the theories, so why should they be explained to u? go sit in on an intro to physics class lol
i've been in ap physics, and I know your arguments are bs

you havent explained how "gravity" works.

how exactly does this works?
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: AlwaysHaveQuestions, OOGABOOGA and MrGlutton
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7125 and curryslayerordeath
i've been in ap physics, and I know your arguments are bs

you havent explained how "gravity" works.

how exactly does this works?
woah brooo u took ap physics, so cool i bet u know so much xD

within the standard model of particle physics, which has tied together every interaction and structure across space perfectly, gravity is one of the fundamental forces (so not a composition of diff things). the particle associated w the force is called the graviton. do u want more specificity into the interactions of those particles?

u have the evidence for the effects of gravity urself, do u fall to the ground? if so, then theres an attractive force between urself and another object, the relationship between them along w the constant of association was discovered by an english scientist-cavendish (look up his work if u want).

keplers laws of planetary motion are still accepted, does the distinction 'law' hold more weight to u? how do u think u are getting internet? how do u think ur gps works? how do u think the military even sends its weapons? but noooo ur alt ideas must be right cuz science is fake

Pretty sure @Amnesia was trolling?
no clue, ive seen him post abt it before lol. rip me if i took the hook then.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7125, Deleted member 5180, Deleted member 6273 and 5 others
woah brooo u took ap physics, so cool i bet u know so much xD

within the standard model of particle physics, which has tied together every interaction and structure across space perfectly, gravity is one of the fundamental forces (so not a composition of diff things). the particle associated w the force is called the graviton.

u have the evidence for the effects of gravity urself, do u fall to the ground? if so, then theres an attractive force between urself and another object, the relationship between them along w the constant of association was discovered by an english scientist-cavendish (look up his work if u want).

keplers laws of planetary motion are still accepted, does the distinction 'law' hold more weight to u? how do u think u are getting internet? how do u think ur gps works? how do u think the military even sends its weapons? but noooo ur alt ideas must be right cuz science is fake


no clue, ive seen him post abt it before lol. rip me if i took the hook then.
you're arguing with someone who's interested in having sexual intercourse with little girls the ages of 9-13
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 7125, Uglybrazilian and 5 others
woah brooo u took ap physics, so cool i bet u know so much xD

within the standard model of particle physics, which has tied together every interaction and structure across space perfectly, gravity is one of the fundamental forces (so not a composition of diff things). the particle associated w the force is called the graviton.

u have the evidence for the effects of gravity urself, do u fall to the ground? if so, then theres an attractive force between urself and another object, the relationship between them along w the constant of association was discovered by an english scientist-cavendish (look up his work if u want).

keplers laws of planetary motion are still accepted, does the distinction 'law' hold more weight to u? how do u think u are getting internet? how do u think ur gps works? how do u think the military even sends its weapons? but noooo ur alt ideas must be right cuz science is fake


no clue, ive seen him post abt it before lol. rip me if i took the hook then.
"evidence of gravity"

wow you're really proving yourself as retarded
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Uglybrazilian, OOGABOOGA and MrGlutton
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Uglybrazilian, Deleted member 5180, fukmylyf and 2 others
We about to colonize mars but we still don't have a cure for balding smh.

its over for baldingcels
can you imagine mars is going to be colonized soon? unbelievable

if they wanted to, they could easily cure balding
 
  • +1
Reactions: Schnitzel and brainded
can you imagine mars is going to be colonized soon? unbelievable

if they wanted to, they could easily cure balding
Yea its pretty cool that its going to happen in our lifetime.

Im sure there has been billions put into researching male balding, since if a good cure was found that product would make billions of dollars. I'd honestly say that fin or a HT is the best we are gonna get.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wallenberg and MrGlutton
Yea its pretty cool that its going to happen in our lifetime.

Im sure there has been billions put into researching male balding, since if a good cure was found that product would make billions of dollars. I'd honestly say that fin or a HT is the best we are gonna get.
indeed

we'll just have to wait and see what happens
 
  • +1
Reactions: Schnitzel and brainded
It looked fake as hell, the "landing" had the most unconvincing CGI I've seen in my life. Also the NASA "team" supervising the landing, seemed to have been picked specifically to tick all the diversity checkboxes, containing women, blacks, trans and disabled people.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: MrGlutton
It looked fake as hell, the "landing" had the most unconvincing CGI I've seen in my life. Also the NASA "team" supervising the landing, seemed to have been picked specifically to tick all the diversity checkboxes, containing women, blacks, trans and disabled people.

this is coming from gonthar the clown
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Gonthar
this is coming from gonthar the clown
not an argument retard
woah brooo u took ap physics, so cool i bet u know so much xD

within the standard model of particle physics, which has tied together every interaction and structure across space perfectly, gravity is one of the fundamental forces (so not a composition of diff things). the particle associated w the force is called the graviton. do u want more specificity into the interactions of those particles?

u have the evidence for the effects of gravity urself, do u fall to the ground? if so, then theres an attractive force between urself and another object, the relationship between them along w the constant of association was discovered by an english scientist-cavendish (look up his work if u want).

keplers laws of planetary motion are still accepted, does the distinction 'law' hold more weight to u? how do u think u are getting internet? how do u think ur gps works? how do u think the military even sends its weapons? but noooo ur alt ideas must be right cuz science is fake


no clue, ive seen him post abt it before lol. rip me if i took the hook then.
0 proof of gravity, god job
 
  • +1
Reactions: OOGABOOGA
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: OOGABOOGA and Deleted member 6273
not an argument retard

0 proof of gravity, god job
From your logic nothing is provable because we never know something with absolute certainty especially in science.
 
From your logic nothing is provable because we never know something with absolute certainty especially in science.
nah last time we had this discussion you pussied out and bailed on the convo. i'll bump the thread
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: OOGABOOGA and Deleted member 6273
nah lat time we had this discussion you pussied out and bailed on the convo. i'll bump the thread
Nah I just realized I was wasting my time.

Let me ask you a question can you absolutely prove something without a shadow of a doubt aside from the fact that you are thinking.
 
Nah I just realized I was wasting my time.

Let me ask you a question can you absolutely prove something without a shadow of a doubt aside from the fact that you are thinking.
nah I asked my question in the other thread, address that first or else you're just a fucking whiny evasive bitch who neeeds to say "muh asting my time"

btw, I'd argue posting in offtopic in general is "wasting your time"
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: OOGABOOGA and Deleted member 6273
Quite remarkable honestly.

they've successfully landed a robot on that dead planet to detect whatever or not life existed on it.

everything is proceeding as I've foreseen, and at an accelerated rate.


NASA just has the budget of a large cap company. IMAGINE if they had the military budget? The amount of advancements that we would undergo...

The United States of America is one of the most retarded nations to have ever existed. :confused:

I wanna have sex with a quarian in my life time but sadly doubt it would happen 😔
 
@africancel go on google, it is indeed a theory. this is a fact

another fact, you're a nigger
"A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results."

Scientifc theory is not the same as "theory".
You can run experiments yourself at home testing the effects of gravity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: curryslayerordeath
"A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results."

Scientifc theory is not the same as "theory".
You can run experiments yourself at home testing the effects of gravity.
ever hear of density? why do certain things float in water but certain things sink?

why do balloons rise but people fall to the ground?

these "at home experiments" do not "prove" gravity, but only prove weight
 
  • +1
Reactions: buckchadley31 and OOGABOOGA
ever hear of density? why do certain things float in water but certain things sink?

why do balloons rise but people fall to the ground?

these "at home experiments" do not "prove" gravity, but only prove weight
Air has a density duh
Baloons rise because helium is less dense then the air. People are obviously not.

I can't believe I'm explaining 5th grade science to a 25 year old. I'm gonna assume you are a mastermind troll and I'm falling for the bait.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Uglybrazilian
Air has a density duh
Baloons rise because helium is less dense then the air. People are obviously not.

I can't believe I'm explaining 5th grade science to a 25 year old. I'm gonna assume you are a mastermind troll and I'm falling for the bait.
water and air both have a density,

things sink in water and others float. that was my point
 
  • +1
Reactions: OOGABOOGA
0 proof of gravity, god job
I gave you the places to “prove” what u wanted...

Did u even fucking read what I sent before responding?
@africancel go on google, it is indeed a theory. this is a fact

another fact, you're a nigger
Jfl @ calling someone a nigger when they prob iq mog u by 30 pts @africancel

If u wanna go in that direction, it’s called Newton’s LAW of gravitation & keplers LAWS of planetary motion. even by ur retarded toddler tier arguments, u still fail.
 
@Amnesia @personalityinkwell
51CF1D30 AAAC 42D1 9446 85568E5A85A2

Love to see it boys. I knew emnesya was on it but didn’t know you were this level of based pinkwell
 
  • +1
Reactions: Amnesia and Deleted member 4612
I gave you the places to “prove” what u wanted...

Did u even fucking read what I sent before responding?

Jfl @ calling someone a nigger when they prob iq mog u by 30 pts @africancel

If u wanna go in that direction, it’s called Newton’s LAW of gravitation & keplers LAWS of planetary motion. even by ur retarded toddler tier arguments, u still fail.
ever hear of density? why do certain things float in water but certain things sink?

why do balloons rise but people fall to the ground?

these "at home experiments" do not "prove" gravity, but only prove weight
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: curryslayerordeath
i've been in ap physics, and I know your arguments are bs

you havent explained how "gravity" works.

how exactly does this works?
with a field theory, you can get forces as changes in momentum and mediated by exchange particles out of the formalism. You can see how neatly it all works together, but at some point you will have to make a starting point, where you cannot explain something, because there really is nothing to explain.
 
you're arguing with someone who's interested in having sexual intercourse with little girls the ages of 9-13
lies, i dont want 9 year olds. teens though sure. (like all men do biolgically speaking)

also btw, you do realize in the bible it says once you hit puberty its ok to have sex right? or do you just conveniently ignore that
 
Last edited:
with a field theory, you can get forces as changes in momentum and mediated by exchange particles out of the formalism. You can see how neatly it all works together, but at some point you will have to make a starting point, where you cannot explain something, because there really is nothing to explain.
wait i'm confused, elab on this
 
ever hear of density? why do certain things float in water but certain things sink?

why do balloons rise but people fall to the ground?

these "at home experiments" do not "prove" gravity, but only prove weight
ur fucking retarded. weight is defined as the gravitational force on smt.

congrats, u "proved" it urself. dont continue this further, ur responses contradict each other and have no substance.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Uglybrazilian, MrGlutton and Deleted member 6273
ur fucking retarded. weight is defined as the gravitational force on smt.

congrats, u "proved" it urself. dont continue this further, ur responses contradict each other and have no substance.
you act like that is the exact definition of weight, when there could be other definitions that could fit in a flat earth universe.

its in essence a circular argument
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Amnesia and Deleted member 6273
If u wanna go in that direction, it’s called Newton’s LAW of gravitation & keplers LAWS of planetary motion. even by ur retarded toddler tier arguments, u still fail.
cope, just cause they're termed as laws doesn't mean theyre infallible, because physical laws are derived from empirical observations.
there's actually no way to prove gravity, the only "proof" we have of it is observing that it happens. we can establish models that describe what we see and call them LAWS because they hold true in (seemingly) all observable cases, but we can't PROVE them definitively
just semantics though
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 4612, AlwaysHaveQuestions and buckchadley31
kek
just
kek
 
you act like that is the exact definition of weight, when there could be other definitions that could fit in a flat earth universe.

its in essence a circular argument
everything is based on definitions lol, if theyre all consistent with one another, then its valid. in an alternate construction, youd have to create separate measures, which there arent.
cope, just cause they're termed as laws doesn't mean theyre infallible, because physical laws are derived from empirical observations.
there's actually no way to prove gravity, the only "proof" we have of it is observing that it happens. we can establish models that describe what we see and call them LAWS because they hold true in (seemingly) all observable cases, but we can't PROVE them definitively
just semantics though
yea i know, its not an argument

but its only cuz pinkwell thinks the word THEORY means that smth is just guesswork. so maybe the word LAW will hold a bit more value.

read the context of his replies, thats just a side part directed against his criticism of using theories
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MrGlutton and Copeful
cope, just cause they're termed as laws doesn't mean theyre infallible, because physical laws are derived from empirical observations.
there's actually no way to prove gravity, the only "proof" we have of it is observing that it happens. we can establish models that describe what we see and call them LAWS because they hold true in (seemingly) all observable cases, but we can't PROVE them definitively
just semantics though
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful

Similar threads

omnis
Replies
100
Views
8K
YHWH's ghost
YHWH's ghost
Edgarpill
Replies
51
Views
7K
Adoins
Adoins
heightmaxxing
Replies
7
Views
592
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
heightmaxxing
Replies
56
Views
7K
lurking truecel
lurking truecel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top