Reckless Turtle
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2021
- Posts
- 16,610
- Reputation
- 23,056
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Not seeing it.Ipdcell
Not seeing it.
It's ironic because she's Putin's bitch and didn't speak out against the war despite people complaining about her stance.
How is the probability 0.3989 for 1/2? Who did the math??
How is the probability 0.3989 for 1/2? Who did the math??
Place your vote.absolute clueless user. He cant see that see is a fucking hamershark JFL at OP
I wanna fuck herView attachment 2303289View attachment 2303297View attachment 2303298View attachment 2303283View attachment 2303284View attachment 2303285View attachment 2303286View attachment 2303287View attachment 2303288View attachment 2303291View attachment 2303292View attachment 2303293View attachment 2303296View attachment 2303299View attachment 2303300View attachment 2303303View attachment 2303304View attachment 2303305View attachment 2303306View attachment 2303307View attachment 2303294View attachment 2303295
View attachment 2303310
View attachment 2303308
View attachment 2303309
I
I wanna fuck her
Place your vote.
She looks worseUpgraded version of Palvin
Upgraded version of Palvin
similar side profile worse front worse bodyShe looks worse
That's exactly what I think and wondered who would agree.Upgraded version of Palvin
Upgraded version of Palvin
She looks worse
Either way +19 yo women without makeup are a joke, even supermodelssimilar side profile worse front worse body
She looks worse
similar side profile worse front worse body
She has better vertical proportions than Palvin so the body comparison isn't necessarily true.Place your vote.
You, sir, are a pedophile.Either way +19 yo women without makeup are a joke, even supermodels
View attachment 2303917
vs
View attachment 2303918View attachment 2303919
Her face is too boxy and her IPD is pretty badShe has better vertical proportions than Palvin so the body comparison isn't necessarily true.
Like the poster above you, it is ironic to consider her IPD as "bad" while simultaneously believing that David Gandy has attractive eyes.Her face is too boxy and her IPD is pretty bad
Well Gandy's eyes are too far appart as well, it's a flaw of his. Doesn't mean he doesn't have amazing eyesLike the poster above you, it is ironic to consider her IPD as "bad" while simultaneously believing that David Gandy has attractive eyes.
The issue is believing that "flaw" is substantial. In the case of the OP, her eye asymmetry is more detrimental than her IPD.Well Gandy's eyes are too far appart as well, it's a flaw of his. Doesn't mean he doesn't have amazing eyes
You, sir, are a pedophile.
Im just saying she isnt a better version on palvin, looks worse to meThe issue is believing that "flaw" is substantial. In the case of the OP, her eye asymmetry is more detrimental than her IPD.
Don't make me tag @the BULL.
A 16 years old can be a pedophile???
Don't make me tag @the BULL.
Im just saying she isnt a better version on palvin, looks worse to me
Place your vote.
Done bhai . 8.25-8.5. Although I don't like rating frauders. Are there any pictures of her young self without makeup?Place your vote.
View attachment 2303341
Done bhai . 8.25-8.5. Although I don't like rating frauders. Are there any pictures of her young self without makeup?
That's the least amount I easily found.
Looks good. The normalized and extensive use of makeup by women makes them really hard to rate, any female instagram/runway model perma-wears makeup, so God knows what is behind itThat's the least amount I easily found.
Yeah, it's a good thing I included backstage candids rather than relying on modeling polaroids.Looks good. The normalized and extensive use of makeup by women makes them really hard to rate, any female instagram/runway model perma-wears makeup, so God knows what is behind it
very nice
There are around 8 billion people on Earth.I struggle to understand the last column but f your Excel page ( Estimated number of people within percentile ). Judging by what you wrote there, there are around 15 billion people on Earth ?
Yes, but why there are so many people in your sheet then ? If you combine all the people within the said percentile, you will get like 15 Billion.There are around 8 billion people on Earth.
4 billion people are more attractive than 5/10Yes, but why there are so many people in your sheet then ? If you combine all the people within the said percentile, you will get like 15 Billion.
Place your vote.
Stop being sexist and Russophobic.Palvin fogs into oblivion, and her IPD is good for a foid, it's a feminine feature + she can fraud it with fakeup
Nonsense. The probability at each point is 0. You have to integrate the curve. The probability on the left of 0 is 0.5
Nonsense. The probability at each point is 0. You have to integrate the curve. The probability on the left of 0 is 0.5
You have to integrate to get the probability or use a table like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_normal_tableProbability density function - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Such as the ones that can be found on Google images within five seconds of searching "normal distribution curve?"use a table like this
Seems like all of the examples I post are. Consider visiting the thread in the third comment and reading the instructions.She looks extremely retarded